Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1652021 07 01.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34346599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A thoracic aortic dissection is a rare condition (2.5-3.5 per 100,000 person years) and patients can present with atypical symptoms. However, a missed diagnosis is often fatal. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 66-years-old male presents himself at the GP's office with sharp pain and loss of strength and sensation in the right arm. Pulse and blood pressure are undetectable on the right arm. An immediate thoracoabdominal CT-angiography is ordered in the nearest hospital. It reveals an aortic dissection (Stanford type A) and the patient is swiftly transferred to a tertiary referral hospital. Upon emergency surgery, the aortic valve, -root and ascending aorta are replaced. The patient is discharged home after one month. CONCLUSION: Swift recognition and referral are paramount to survival in aortic dissection. Patients with a low suspicion can be referred to the closed hospital for immediate imaging. When suspicion is high, direct transfer to a thoracic surgery hospital is warranted.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Dissection , Aged , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Aorta , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Valve , Computed Tomography Angiography , Humans , Male
2.
Br J Surg ; 108(1): 80-87, 2021 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33640946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) is increasingly being performed because of perceived patient benefits. Whether conversion of MIPD to open pancreatoduodenectomy worsens outcome, and which risk factors are associated with conversion, is unclear. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a European multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing MIPD (2012-2017) in ten medium-volume (10-19 MIPDs annually) and four high-volume (at least 20 MIPDs annually) centres. Propensity score matching (1 : 1) was used to compare outcomes of converted and non-converted MIPD procedures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for conversion, with results presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i). RESULTS: Overall, 65 of 709 MIPDs were converted (9.2 per cent) and the overall 30-day mortality rate was 3.8 per cent. Risk factors for conversion were tumour size larger than 40 mm (OR 2.7, 95 per cent c.i.1.0 to 6.8; P = 0.041), pancreatobiliary tumours (OR 2.2, 1.0 to 4.8; P = 0.039), age at least 75 years (OR 2.0, 1.0 to 4.1; P = 0.043), and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (OR 5.2, 2.5 to 10.7; P < 0.001). Medium-volume centres had a higher risk of conversion than high-volume centres (15.2 versus 4.1 per cent, P < 0.001; OR 4.1, 2.3 to 7.4, P < 0.001). After propensity score matching (56 converted MIPDs and 56 completed MIPDs) including risk factors, rates of complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade of III or higher (32 versus 34 per cent; P = 0.841) and 30-day mortality (12 versus 6 per cent; P = 0.274) did not differ between converted and non-converted MIPDs. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for conversion during MIPD include age, large tumour size, tumour location, laparoscopic approach, and surgery in medium-volume centres. Although conversion during MIPD itself was not associated with worse outcomes, the outcome in these patients was poor in general which should be taken into account during patient selection for MIPD.


Subject(s)
Conversion to Open Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Conversion to Open Surgery/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 140: 8-16, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31158800

ABSTRACT

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) comprises gallbladder and intra-/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (GBC, ICC, EHC), which are currently classified by anatomical origin. Better understanding of the mutational profile of BTCs might refine classification and improve treatment. We performed a systematic review of studies reporting on mutational profiling of BTC. We included articles reporting on whole-exome/whole-genome-sequencing (WES/WGS) and targeted sequencing (TS) of BTC, published between 2000-2017. Pooled mutation proportions were calculated, stratified by anatomical region and sequencing technique. A total of 25 studies with 1806 patients were included. Overall, TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene in BTC. GBC was associated with mutations in PFKFB3, PLXN2 and PGAP1. Mutations in IDH1, IDH2 and FGFR fusions almost exclusively occurred in ICC patients. Mutations in APC, GNAS and TGFBR2 occurred exclusively in EHC patients. In conclusion, subtypes of BTCs exhibit minor differences in mutational profile, which is likely influenced by the cell of origin.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein/genetics , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/metabolism , Cholangiocarcinoma/genetics , Cholangiocarcinoma/metabolism , Chromogranins/genetics , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs/genetics , Humans , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Phosphofructokinase-2/genetics , Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases/genetics , Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type II/genetics
4.
Br J Surg ; 103(8): 941-9, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27304847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer involving the coeliac axis is considered unresectable by most guidelines, with a median survival of 6-11 months. A subgroup of these patients can undergo distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection, but consensus on the value of this procedure is lacking. The evidence for this procedure, including the impact of preoperative hepatic artery embolization and (neo)adjuvant therapy, was evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines until 27 May 2015. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included morbidity and radical resection rates. RESULTS: A total of 19 retrospective studies, involving 240 patients, were included. The methodological quality of the studies ranged from poor to moderate. A radical resection was reported in 74·5 per cent (152 of 204), major morbidity in 27 per cent (26 of 96), ischaemic morbidity in 9·0 per cent (21 of 223) and 90-day mortality in 3·5 per cent (4 of 113). Overall, 35·5 per cent of patients (55 of 155) underwent preoperative hepatic artery embolization without an apparent beneficial impact on ischaemic morbidity. Overall, 15·7 per cent (29 of 185) had neoadjuvant and 51·0 per cent (75 of 147) had adjuvant therapy. There was a difference in survival between patient series where less than half of patients had (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and series where more than half were receiving this treatment: case-weighted median overall survival was 16 (range 9-48) versus 18 (10-26) months respectively (P = 0·002). Overall median survival for the whole study population was 14·4 (range 9-48) months. CONCLUSION: Distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection seems a valuable option for selected patients with pancreatic cancer involving the coeliac axis with acceptable morbidity and mortality, and a median survival of 18 months when combined with (neo)adjuvant therapy.


Subject(s)
Celiac Plexus/surgery , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic , Hepatic Artery , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...