Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv ; 23(6): 312-20, 1997 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9234073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 1993 the 13 VHA Southern New England (VHA-SNE) hospitals have been engaged in a regionally sponsored initiative to analyze and improve selected clinical processes. Nine of these hospitals have chosen to participate in an initiative in which observation units were postulated to offer a tool for improving the care of patients with chest pain-the VHA initiative to Implement Chest Pain Treatment in Observation Units. THE FIVE PHASES: In phase 1 of the initiative, the VHA-SNE's Clinical Benchmarking Work Group reviewed the medical literature, which confirmed longstanding systemic and pervasive problems in the evaluation of chest pain patients. The work group's preferred practice was the outpatient "rule out myocardial infarction [MI] evaluation" program during monitored observation; serial testing can accurately diagnose low- and moderate-probability patients with MI. In Phase 2 the study group surveyed the emergency departments in the nine hospitals, discovering significant variation in admission rates and practice patterns. During phase 3 the work group identified a health care organization demonstrating best-practice performance--one of the few hospitals in the nation with an operational outpatient "rule out MI evaluation" program. A team site-visited that organization and recorded information about its structure and processes. VHA-SNE then published a monograph that identified its current performance, described the best-practice approach, offered strategies to implement the model program, and analyzed the financial implications and return on investment. In phase 4 a pilot hospital implemented the model program, which in phase 5 is being extended to the other hospitals represented in the work group. Information regarding protocols, lessons learned, and barriers to implementation was freely provided.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Pain Clinics/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Chest Pain/economics , Chest Pain/therapy , Connecticut , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Humans , Multi-Institutional Systems/standards , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Observation , Pilot Projects , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics
2.
Conn Med ; 45(7): 443-4, 1981 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7249652
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...