[Potentially Inappropriate Medication of Nursing Home Residents: An Analysis of Risk Factors Based on National Claims Data (AOK) for 2017]. / Potentiell inadäquate Medikation bei Heimbewohnern: Eine Analyse von Risikofaktoren anhand bundesweiter GKV-Routinedaten der AOK für das Jahr 2017.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) to nursing home residents using the PRISCUS list in 2017. METHODS: Using claims data (AOK) we analysed insured nursing home residents aged 65 or older in 2017. The PRISCUS list was used to identify PIMs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyse risk factors. RESULTS: The study population in 2017 included 259 328 nursing home residents, out of them 25.5% received at least one potentially inappropriate medication (women: 25.6%/men: 24.9%). Female and younger aged nursing home residents had a higher risk for at least one PRISCUS prescription. Polypharmacy, an increasing number of attending physicians, and hospital stays were additional risk factors for a PRISCUS prescription. Furthermore, regional (Bundesland) variations contributed to differences in PRISCUS prescriptions. CONCLUSION: The frequent PIM prescriptions in nursing home residents are a relevant topic regarding drug therapy safety. Regional differences, which cannot be explained by nursing home resident characteristics, show options for modifications and the need for further research.

Frequency of neuroimaging for pediatric minor brain injury is determined by the primary treating medical department.

To investigate the use of neuroimaging in children and adolescents with minor brain injury in pediatric and non-pediatric departments.In this observational cohort study data were extracted from a large German statutory health insurance (AOK Plus Dresden ∼3.1 million clients) in a 7-year period (2010-2016). All patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code S06.0 (concussion; minor brain injury; commotio cerebri) aged ≤ 18 years were included. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis for associations with the use of CT and MRI (independent variables: gender, age, length of stay, pediatric vs non-pediatric department, university vs non-university hospital).A total of 14,805 children with minor brain injuries (mean age 6.0 ±â€Š5.6; 45.5% females) were included. Treatment was provided by different medical departments: Pediatrics (N = 8717; 59%), Pediatric Surgery (N = 3582, 24%), General Surgery (N = 2197, 15%), Orthopedic Trauma Surgery (N = 309, 2.1%). Patients admitted to pediatric departments (Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery) underwent head CT-imaging significantly less frequently (3.8%) compared to patients treated in non-pediatric departments (18.5%; P < .001; General Surgery: 15.6%; Orthopedic Trauma Surgery: 39.2%). Logistic regression confirmed a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for the use of cranial CT by the non-pediatric departments (OR: 3.2 [95-%-CI: 2.72-3.76]).CT was significantly less frequently used in pediatric departments. Educational efforts and quality improvement initiatives on physicians, especially in non-pediatric departments may be an effective approach to decreasing rates of CT after minor traumatic brain injuries.

Prescription of Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs in Patients with Mild Cognitive Deficits and Alzheimer's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDR) should be avoided in patients with cognitive impairment. We evaluated the relationship between a BZDR treatment and the health status of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 395 AD patients using bivariate and multiple logistic analyses to assess correlations between the prescription of BZDR and patients' characteristics (cognitive and functional capacity, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), neuropsychiatric symptoms). RESULTS: BZDR were used in 12.4% (n=49) of all participants. In bivariate analyses, the prescription was associated with a lower HrQoL, a higher need of care, and the presence of anxiety. Multivariate models revealed a higher risk of BZDR treatment in patients with depression (OR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.45 - 10.27). Community-dwelling participants and those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists had a lower risk of receiving BZDR (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.89 and OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.36). DISCUSSION: The inappropriate use of BZDR conflicts with national and international guidelines. We suggest evaluating indications and treatment duration and improving the knowledge of alternative therapies in healthcare institutions.

Antidepressant medication in a German cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease
.

OBJECTIVE: The use of antidepressant drugs in dementia patients is associated with the risk of adverse events, and the evidence for relevant effects is scarce. We aimed to determine the associations between the prescription of antidepressants and patients' sociodemographic (e.g., age, gender, living situation) and clinical characteristics (e.g., disease severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 395 institutionalized and community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) across all severity stages of dementia in a cross-sectional study design. The patients' clinical characteristics comprised of cognitive status, daily activities, depressive symptoms, further neuropsychiatric symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses for the association between the use of antidepressant drugs and the covariates. RESULTS: Approximately 31% of the participants were treated with antidepressant drugs, with a higher chance of being medicated for institutionalized patients (χ2-test: p = 0.010). In the bivariate analyses, the use of antidepressants was significantly associated with higher levels of care, lower cognitive and daily life capacity, higher extent of neuropsychiatric symptoms, and a lower proxy-reported HrQoL. Finally, multiple logistic regression models showed a significantly higher use of antidepressants in patients treated by psychiatrists and neurologists (OR 2.852, 95% CI: 1.223 - 6.652). CONCLUSION: The use of antidepressant drugs in the study population was high, and the suitability of the treatment with antidepressants remains unclear. Participants with diminished cognitive and functional capacity, higher extent of neuropsychiatric symptoms, and those treated by neuropsychiatric specialists were more likely to be treated with antidepressants. The pharmaceutical treatment of patients with these clinical characteristics should be particularly considered in the daily care for dementia patients. Further longitudinal studies should evaluate the appropriateness of indications for antidepressants and the causative direction of correlations with the patients' clinical characteristics.
.

Antipsychotic treatment of community-dwelling and institutionalised patients with dementia in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: A restrictive use of antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is recommended due to an increased risk of cerebrovascular events and mortality. We hypothesise that the prescription of antipsychotics is associated with the patients' socio-demographic and clinical status (e.g., dementia severity). METHODS: The prescription of antipsychotics was cross-sectionally evaluated in 272 community-dwelling and 123 institutionalised patients with AD across all severity stages of dementia. The patients' clinical characteristics covered the cognitive status, neuropsychiatric symptoms, daily activities, and quality of life (HrQoL). To determine associations with the use of antipsychotics bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Totally, 25% of the patients were treated with antipsychotics. significantly less frequently than nursing home inhabitants (15.1% vs. 45.5%). Severely demented patients (MMSE 0-9) received antipsychotics most often (51.5%). Additionally, multiple regression analyses revealed a higher chance of prescription for participants with depressive symptoms (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.019-5.160) and those treated by neuropsychiatric specialists (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.408-8.328). CONCLUSIONS: Further longitudinal studies are required to assess the appropriateness of indications for antipsychotics and the reasons for a higher use in nursing home inhabitants and patients with severe dementia and depression.

Use of antidementia drugs in German patients with Alzheimer's disease.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of antidementia drugs (ADDs) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) regarding German guideline recommendations and to assess correlations between the use of ADDs and the patients' characteristics. A total of 395 community-dwelling and institutionalized patients with AD across all severity stages of dementia were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Associations between the prescription of ADDs and patients' sociodemographic and clinical parameters (neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive capacity, daily activities, and health-related quality of life) were analyzed in multiple logistic regression analyses. ADDs were prescribed in 46.6% of all participants and less often in institutionalized patients (38.2 vs. 50.4%, P=0.025). Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia had a higher chance of receiving ADDs [odds ratio (OR)=3.752, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.166-12.080 and OR=3.526, 95% CI: 1.431-8.688] as well as those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists (OR=2.467, 95% CI: 1.288-4.726). Overall, 39% of the patients with mild cognitive deficits (Mini-Mental Status Examination 27-30) received ADDs and 21% of the mildly demented patients (Mini-Mental Status Examination 20-26) received memantine. The treatment with ADDs was in part not in line with German guideline recommendations. Particularly, the lower use of ADDs in patients not attending neuropsychiatric specialists should be further evaluated.

Health-Related Genetic Direct-to-Consumer Tests in the German Setting: The Available Offer and the Potential Implications for a Solidarily Financed Health-Care System.

BACKGROUND: The global genetic direct-to-consumer (DTC) market will reach a volume of USD 230 billion in 2018. The expenditures for this genetic analysis are borne by the customer, whereas consequential costs may arise for a solidarily financed system. In a first step, it is essential to gain an overview of the currently available offer in the German setting. METHODS: In April 2016, we conducted a systematic internet search in the Google search engine. In November 2016, we updated the information of the webpages in terms of country, language, types of health-related tests, additional offer of non-health-related DTC test, information about sensitivity and specificity, certification and accreditation, costs as well as reference to German Act on Genetic Testing. RESULTS: Thirty-five webpages were included in the final overview. A plurality of different predictive analysis options was identified. Price information was not available for all offered genetic analyses. Costs for predictive analysis in one disease vary between EUR 90 and 990, for predictive package analysis between EUR 232.18 and 375, and for genetic lifestyle analysis between EUR 84.55 and 570.20. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic results may lead to uncertainty and anxiety; therefore, subsequent costs for a solidarily financed system may arise. Genetic DTC tests may have an influence on different players on the micro-, meso- and macro-levels, which may have a cost-cutting or cost-increasing effect on health-care expenditures. The increased interest in genetic analysis as well as the possibility of worldwide internet-based access to genetic tests requires population-wide education.

[Evaluation of family doctor-centred health care in Germany based on AOK Rheinland/Hamburg claims data]. / Evaluation der hausarztzentrierten Versorgung in Deutschland anhand von GKV-Routinedaten der AOK Rheinland/Hamburg.

BACKGROUND: Health insurance funds in Germany are obliged to offer family doctor-centred health care models (Hausarztzentrierte Versorgung, "HzV"). The participation is voluntary for the insured persons. Participants agree to utilise outpatient specialist care only if their family doctor or general practitioner ("gatekeeper") refers them to a specialist. The aim of this programme is to both strengthen the role of general practitioners and to avoid unnecessary specialist visits and double examinations. Moreover, the quality of care should increase and costs decrease. There is a controversial debate among health politicians whether these objectives can be achieved with current HzV contracts. Therefore, the aim of this project was to conduct an economic evaluation of family doctor-centred health care compared with the standard of care. METHODS: The analysis covered continuously insured adult HzV participants, who have been enrolled in the contract offered by a large German sickness fund (AOK Rheinland/Hamburg) since 2011. In addition, the analysis contained data of a control group which was three times larger than the intervention group. Logistic regression analysis with relevant characteristics (social demographics, health care utilisation, cost, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) of participants and non-participants was conducted to assess the likelihood of participation in the HzV contract. With the subsequent propensity score matching, differences in the characteristics between the control and the intervention group were compensated for the base year 2010 in order to be able to evaluate the influence of the HzV contract in subsequent years. Study objectives were to analyse differences in costs as well as utilisation of services between HzV participants and the control group. RESULTS: The intervention group consisted of 25,201 HzV participants with an average age of 49.5 years [SD: 17.9]. 54.4% of them were female. The HzV participants showed significantly higher costs compared to the control group in the first and in the second year after enrolment. Drug costs in the first year added up to an average of 499 EUR [SD: 2,021] compared to 477 EUR [SD: 2,050] in the control group. In the second year, the drug costs were 544 EUR [SD: 2,758] in the intervention group and 522 EUR [SD: 2,341] in the control group. In addition, the analysis showed a higher number of specialist referrals issued by general practitioners in the intervention group. However, the length of stay in hospitals was shown to be decreasing for HzV participants. DISCUSSION: The higher costs and use of services indicate a higher morbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index and in comparison to the German population) of HzV participants. The cost level increases in both groups, but within the group of HzV participants, the relative cost increase in the second year was lower than in the control group. The results of this study demonstrate that family doctor-centred health care is assumed to be more efficient in the long term. With regard to the objective of these contracts, quality improvement may not be achievable at the same time as cost savings. As our data set cannot distinguish between changes of patient behaviour and physician behaviour, the results of our study need to be interpreted with caution.

Status and perspectives of claims data analyses in Germany-A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this article is to evaluate the status, development, and perspectives of German claims data analyses in the international and health political context. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and DIMDI to identify empirical and methodological articles focusing on health insurance claims data studies published between 2000 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were (1) English/German full text articles or chapters in edited books that (2) focused on the claims data of statutory health insurance funds. FINDINGS: In total, 435 articles were included. Over time, the number of claims data studies has increased strongly and the frequency of policy-relevant research types increased. Along with the historical improvement path of claims data in Germany, we observed a rising percentage of international publications and an increase in the average quality of publications. In contrast to the US or Canada where comprehensive databases have been established, the most common data source in this search was data from a single SHI fund, while databases were rarely used. CONCLUSIONS: Claims data are an important source of information for healthcare stakeholders, and their use for research purposes has further increased during recent years in Germany. Despite its potential in optimising the health system, we found a lack of German comprehensive all-payer claims databases compared to the US and Canada.

Costs and treatment patterns of incident ADHD patients - a comparative analysis before and after the initial diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The costs and treatment patterns of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are subjects of health services research in Germany and worldwide. Previous publications focused mainly on prevalent patients and thus research gaps were identified regarding costs and treatment patterns of incident patients before and after the first diagnosis. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using claims data obtained from a large German sickness fund (Techniker Krankenkasse). Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with at least two secured outpatient or one inpatient ADHD diagnosis in 2007. Incidence was ensured by defining a baseline period without ADHD-diagnosis in 2006. In addition to diseaserelated cost analyses compared to a control group including age group comparisons, comorbidities, the proportion of multimodal treatment and medication treatment patterns were described. RESULTS: In total, 9083 newly diagnosed ADHD patients were identified (73 % male; mean age: 12.9 years (SD: 10.3)). The mean total cost of ADHD patients during the year after the first diagnosis exceeded the mean total cost of the year before by 976 € (Differencein-Difference-estimator: 1006 €). Our analyses have shown that 10 % of ADHD patients have been treated with multimodal therapy. In addition, 11 % of the investigated ADHD population have received methylphenidate or atomoxetine preceeding the date of diagnosis in the relevant observation period. DISCUSSION: This study provides important insights into the costs as well as the treatment patterns of incident ADHD patients. ADHD-related costs and medications can be identified prior to the date of the first ADHD diagnosis. Although, multimodal therapy is presented as an optimal treatment option by many international guidelines and experts, its proportion for treatment is low (10 %). Further research is necessary to identify reasons for the low proportion of multimodal therapy and (cost-)effectiveness has to be evaluated in comparison to other treatment options. In addition, ADHD-related costs could be identified before the first diagnosis is documented. The reasons for medication prior to diagnosis have to be further investigated.