Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 83
Filter
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 158(4): 411-7, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22487783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ocular symptoms remain widely neglected while they concern the majority of subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) and impair their daily activities. We describe the characteristics of ocular symptoms in subjects suffering from AR in the French INSTANT study and their impact on daily activities. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational survey was carried out in November 2006 using face-to-face interviews. RESULTS: 31.7% of the population-based sample (n = 4,019) suffered from AR and 52.0% of AR subjects (n = 663) described ocular symptoms. Men had significantly less ocular symptoms than women (odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89). 57.5% of subjects suffered from ocular symptoms for >5 years, 30.2% for >6 months in the past 12 months, and 92.2% during the pollen season. The troublesome ocular symptoms were itching eyes (51.1%), watery eyes (38.6%), red eyes (6.6%) and swollen eyelids (3.6%). The trigger factors were pollens (51.3%), household dust and mites (34.8%), pets (12.2%) and air pollution (3.8%). Ocular symptoms had a negative impact on daily activities (blurred sight 47.8%, reduction in daily activities 38.8%, reduction in efficacy at work 25.8%, sleep disturbances 16.3%, and sick leave 12.9%). They were diagnosed in 38.9% of subjects and followed up in 34.8%. Treatment for ocular symptoms was prescribed to 35.4% of subjects and to 61.9% of subjects with a regular follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms the impact of ocular symptoms on AR patients' lives and suggests that they are still neglected and undertreated.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Adult , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Allergens/adverse effects , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dust , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pets , Pollen/adverse effects , Prevalence , Pyroglyphidae , Quality of Life , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Visual Acuity , Young Adult
2.
Med Mal Infect ; 41(10): 540-5, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21907512

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify bacteria responsible for facial cellulitis of dental origin. DESIGN: Adult patients, admitted for facial cellulitis of dental origin were included. The pus sample was taken by swabbing during the surgical incision and drainage performed under general anesthesia. The bacteriological diagnosis was performed by microscopic examination and bacterial culture in aerobic and anaerobic atmosphere. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven bacterial species were isolated from 100 samplings, that is to say 2.07 bacterial species per sample. 19% of the samples contained only aerobic germs, 36% only anaerobic ones, and 45% contained mixed aerobic and anaerobic flora. Streptococcus (65.38%) and Capnocytophaga (11.54%) were the most frequently isolated aerobic bacteria. The anaerobic bacteria accounted for 62.32% of isolates and the most frequently isolated were Prevotella (55%) and Fusobacterium (16.28%). Bacterial species were not significantly different according to the age (P-value=0.06) and sex (P-value=0.584). There was a significant statistical association between aerobic or anaerobic bacteria and clinical symptoms such as cheek edema (P-value=0.03) and pus at tooth root (P-value=0.02). Patients previously treated by antibiotic therapy presented significantly more infections due to the same respiratory germ type (P-value=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the bacterial flora responsible for facial cellulitis of dental origin is polymorphic, anaerobic bacteria were predominant.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Cellulitis/microbiology , Stomatognathic Diseases/complications , Stomatognathic Diseases/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Face , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Rhinology ; 49(2): 155-62, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21743869

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Development and validation of an epistaxis-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (EQQoL) to evaluate the impact on quality of life of epistaxis, during hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study using QoL instruments administered twice in HHT patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 109 patients who had epistaxis and a clinical diagnosis of HHT according to Curacao criteria were included. Invoice of the questionnaire in 2004 and 2006 included SF-36, Jenkins` sleep scale and the new epistaxis-specific13-item EQQoL. RESULTS: EQQoL uptake rate was 98%, mean score 58/100 +- 27, and Cronbach alpha 0.96. EQQoL was sensitive to change with a strong correlation with the course of epistaxis. Factorial analysis showed that EQQoL was clearly distinct from SF-36 and Jenkins sleep scales. In stepwise multivariate ordinal logistic regression, frequency and duration of epistaxis were both associated with lower EQQoL. Conversely, visceral involvement and comorbidity had independent impact on SF-36 scores, but not on EQQoL. CONCLUSIONS: This new epistaxis-specific EQQoL questionnaire provides complementary information on the impact of HHT on patients quality of life relative to the SF-36 generic questionnaire. After international validation, the EQQoL might prove a useful tool for treatment evaluation.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Epistaxis/etiology , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic/complications , Young Adult
4.
Rhinology ; 49(1): 84-9, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21468380

ABSTRACT

This survey-based study was conducted to determine the characteristics that influence the diagnosis and treatment patterns of acute maxillary sinusitis among general practitioners in France. Questionnaires were sent to 467 physicians and requested to be completed for the next 4 adult (≥ 15 years) patients diagnosed with acute maxillary sinusitis. A total of 397 physicians responded with eligible data on 1585 patients (57.5% female; mean age, 42.3 years). The most common presenting signs and symptoms were moderate-to-severe nasal obstruction (80.4%), pain on sinus palpitation (76.8%), facial pain (74.5%), rhinorrhea (70.4%), and headache (63.6%). Local treatments were prescribed in 93.2% of cases, including nasal lavage (52.1%), vasoconstrictors (42.2%), and intranasal corticosteroids (38.7%). Almost all patients (99%) were prescribed oral treatment including antibiotics (86.5%), analgesics (56.3%), antipyretics (53.7%), and expectorants/mucolytics (45.6%). Symptoms were indicated as having a moderate to very significant effect on quality of life areas including activities of daily living (71.6% of patients), leisure (63.1%), and professional/school activities (59.2%). The diagnosis and management patterns of acute maxillary sinusitis among general practitioners in France are generally consistent with the 2007 European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EP3OS) guidelines.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Sinusitis/diagnosis , Maxillary Sinusitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillary Sinusitis/complications , Middle Aged , Nasal Obstruction/etiology , Nasal Obstruction/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Quality of Life , Young Adult
5.
Rhinology ; 48(3): 285-91, 2010 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21038018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is characterized by symptoms whose severity can be difficult to quantify due to the patient's subjective perception. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for assessing the severity of allergic rhinitis, a numerical score (SGS) and a visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. METHODS: A large study was carried out on more than 36,000 patients with a diagnosis of a non-complicated and non-treated seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) between May and August 2004 over all the metropolitan France. For each patient, a physician had to assess the severity of the AR calculating a score corresponding to the intensity of the symptoms as felt by the patient but also using an analog scale. RESULTS: SAR severity differed according to the used method: 18.94% of the patients were classed severe according to the SGS and 23.58% according to the VAS. Moreover, among the 35,126 people for which the two measures were available, 23.86% were classed severe according to one but not according to the other. These patients differ from those classed in the same manner by SGS and VAS in age, gender, type of doctor and geographical area. SGS and VAS correlated each other. Principal prescribed drugs for SAR were antihistamines and local steroids. CONCLUSION: Severity assessment varied according to the used method.


Subject(s)
Pain Measurement , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
6.
Med Mal Infect ; 39(7-8): 554-9, 2009.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19419828

ABSTRACT

Only few epidemiological studies evaluate the role of ENT infections in meningitis. A retrospective review of data shows that the frequency of ENT infections is estimated at 25% in adults and children. Meningitis may occur during otological and nasosinusal infections. Acute otitis media and mastoiditis are the most common ear infections responsible for meningitis. Chronic otitis (cholesteatoma) are rarely involved. In case of acute rhinosinusitis, frequently responsible frontal and ethmoidal locations are investigated by nasal endoscopy and CT scan. A CSF leak originating mostly from anterior skull base or middle ear, either posttraumatic or spontaneous, may also be associated with meningitis. The management of ENT infections begins with antibiotics. Drainage may be discussed when identification of the bacteria is needed or if the medical treatment seems inefficient. In case of a CSF leak, closure of the defect is performed according to its location and size after evaluation by imaging (CT scan, MRI).


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/etiology , Meningitis, Bacterial/etiology , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/diagnosis , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/therapy , Adult , Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea/complications , Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea/diagnosis , Child , Drainage , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mastoiditis/complications , Mastoiditis/diagnosis , Mastoiditis/therapy , Otitis Media/complications , Otitis Media/diagnosis , Otitis Media/therapy , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/complications , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/epidemiology , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Subdural Effusion/complications , Subdural Effusion/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
7.
Allergy ; 64(6): 944-50, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19298572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Topical steroids are first-line medication to control nasal polyposis (NP), a disease with long-term clinical course. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 microg twice a day (bd) after 1 month of treatment, and to compare FPANS 200 microg bd and FPANS 200 microg once a day (od) in maintenance and long-term treatment. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-month study with three treatment periods (1-month acute period followed with 1-month maintenance period and 6-month follow-up period) was carried out. Group 1 received FPANS 200 microg bd, during acute, maintenance and follow-up periods, Group 2 received FPANS 200 microg bd during acute period and FPANS 200 microg od during maintenance and follow-up periods, and Group 3 received placebo during acute and maintenance periods and FPANS 200 microg bd during follow-up period. Endpoints were change from baseline in clinic peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), domiciliary evening PNIF, intensity of symptoms and polyposis grade. RESULTS: After acute period and maintenance periods, FPANS 200 microg bd was significantly more effective than placebo on all endpoints and more effective than FPANS 200 microg od after 1-month maintenance period on clinic PNIF, evening PNIF, obstruction, percentage of days with no sense of smell and percentage of nights with no disturbances. The two doses were similar on other endpoints. After the 6-month follow-up period, there was no difference between the two doses of FPANS at all efficacy endpoints. The safety profile of FPANS did not highlight any new or unanticipated adverse events. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the efficacy of FPANS 200 microg bd in acute treatment and FPANS 200 microg od as a sufficient dose to maintain a long-term efficacy in the treatment for NP.


Subject(s)
Androstadienes/administration & dosage , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Androstadienes/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fluticasone , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
8.
J Radiol ; 89(7-8 Pt 2): 984-97, 2008.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18772776

ABSTRACT

Malignant sinonasal tumors are the most frequent facial malignancies in adults. Assessment of these tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach and imaging plays a major role to define the precise tumor location, volume and extension and to plan post-treatment follow-up. MRI provides superior differentiation between tumor and surrounding tissues and depiction of intracranial or perineural extension. CT is a useful complement to demonstrate bone erosion or extension into the skull base.


Subject(s)
Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) ; 129(1): 35-41, 2008.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18777767

ABSTRACT

In order to assess the acceptability of a new scent-free formulation of mometasone furoate (Nasonex) among allergic rhinitis patients, who already have been treated by the scented formulation of Nasonex, a phone survey was performed with a sample of 216 patients recruited by Nasonex GP's prescribers and pharmacists. The aim of this survey is to assess the diagnosis modalities, the allergic rhinitis characteristics and associated symptoms in one hand and in the other hand, the main reasons which led them to prefer a new scent-free formulation, in comparison with the only commercialized scented mometasone furoate (Nasonex) at the time when this survey was conducted. The impact of unscented Nasonex on patient's compliance to treatment was also assessed. This survey confirms that the GP is the key actor who usually establish the allergy diagnosis and the interrogatory is the principle method used. The prick test was more often and significantly used in 35% of the perennial rhinitis instead of 19% in seasonal allergic rhinitis (p < or = 0.05). When the diagnosis of allergy was established by an allergologist, 89% of them used a prick test. In this survey, asthma was associated in 24% of the patients, particularly in who suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis. 85% of patients rate their smell as globally good. 75% of the treated patients were interested by the new unscented formulation of Nasonex, regardless of the type of their rhinitis, seasonal or perennial. About 60% of patients stated that the lack of odor will led them to be more compliant to their treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Choice Behavior , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Odorants , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnadienediols/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Taste , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Mometasone Furoate , Patient Compliance , Pregnadienediols/administration & dosage
10.
Allergy ; 63(8): 1008-14, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18691304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only aetiological treatment used in allergic rhinitis (AR). A telephone survey of patients and physicians in France was carried out to understand better the real and perceived advantages and inconveniences of this therapeutic approach. METHODS: A cohort of 453 individuals with AR was selected using the Score For Allergic Rhinitis questionnaire. The survey evaluated the level of understanding of allergic rhinitis and its management, including both pharmacotherapy and SIT. A parallel survey was conducted with 400 general practitioners, allergists and nonallergist specialists. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of patients had heard about SIT as a therapeutic option. Of these, 56% had a positive view of SIT and 14% a negative image. A majority of patients and physicians with a positive opinion associated SIT with improved well-being and quality of life, while those with a negative opinion considered it to be a long and inconvenient treatment, with uncertain results. Over 50% of patients who had been offered SIT had accepted it and approximately 60% of these were satisfied with it. The future availability of SIT as sublingual tablets was perceived positively by both patients and physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with AR are unaware of their pathology and few seek help from health professionals. When patients take medication, they are generally satisfied with their treatment, even if it is only symptomatic. Patients and physicians see the notion of definitive recovery as the main benefit of SIT, whereas the main disadvantage is the duration of treatment.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys , Immunotherapy/methods , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
11.
Rhinology ; 46(2): 125-30, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18575014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nasal Polyposis (NP) is defined as a chronic inflammatory disease of sinonasal mucosa leading to diffuse formation of benign polyps. Although family histories are frequently suggested in medical literature, no specific study focused on this point has been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a hereditary factor could be implied for NP in a family where several members were affected. We included 99 members of this family. METHODS: All patients were assessed for conditions known to be associated with the development or presence of NP. Concerning NP, patients were screened with a validated questionnaire and selected patients had a medical examination by an Ear, Nose and Throat practitioner. RESULTS: Thirteen patients had a personal history of NP without asthma, aspirin intolerance, Churg Strauss syndrome, cystic fibrosis, Young's syndrome, bare lymphocyte syndrome, or primary ciliary dyskinesia. Within this family, 19.7% of those older than 17 years were affected by NP, as compared with the national French prevalence of 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the pedigree, we discuss different modes of inheritance. The presence of consanguineous unions in this family suggests the possibility of a common ancestor and thus a recessive autosomal mode of inheritance.


Subject(s)
Consanguinity , Inheritance Patterns/genetics , Nasal Polyps/genetics , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , France , Genetic Linkage/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Polyps/mortality , Nasal Polyps/pathology , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/mortality , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/pathology , Pedigree
12.
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac ; 124(3): 115-9, 2007 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17509517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A prospective study on the learning curve and reproducibility of PNIF measurement with 18 different operators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five hundred twenty-eight patients in two groups were prospectively enrolled in this study from September 2003 to April 2004. The learning curve of the technique was monitored after five patients had been measured. Reproducibility was evaluated with all patients after two consecutive measurements. RESULTS: The technique was acquired by all operators after the fifth patient. The mean PNIF measurements in controls and patients were 86.02+/-36.96 l/min and 89.59+/-41.97 l/min, respectively. Reproducibility (PNIF2-PNIF1=5.51+/-24.93 l/min) was obtained for all operators, whatever the number of measurements taken. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the good reproducibility and the easy training in PNIF measurement.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Diseases/physiopathology , Inhalation/physiology , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Nasal Cavity/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchial Diseases/diagnosis , Bronchial Diseases/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Obstruction/epidemiology , Nasal Obstruction/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
13.
Allergy ; 62(4): 367-72, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17362246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines provide a new classification of allergic rhinitis, but a quantitative analysis for severity assessment is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To study whether a visual analog scale (VAS) for global rhinitis symptoms could be used to assess the disease severity according to ARIA. METHODS: Three thousand fifty-two allergic rhinitis patients seen in primary care were tested. Fifty three per cent had an objective diagnosis of allergy and 58% of the patients were treated. Patients were categorized according to ARIA guidelines. The severity of nasal symptoms was assessed using a VAS. Quality of life was measured using the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ). RESULTS: Severity had more impact on VAS levels than duration: mild intermittent rhinitis (3.5, 2.4-5.0 cm), mild persistent rhinitis (4.5, 3.2-5.6 cm), moderate/severe intermittent rhinitis (6.7, 5.3-7.7 cm) and moderate/severe persistent rhinitis (7.2, 6.1-8.2 cm). The receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that patients with a VAS of under 5 cm could be classified as 'mild' rhinitis (negative predictive value: 93.5%) and those with a VAS of over 6 cm as 'moderate/severe' rhinitis (positive predictive value: 73.6%). Receiver operating characteristic curves and a logistic regression showed that current treatment and allergy diagnosis have no effect on the assessment of rhinitis severity using VAS. Visual analog scale and the RQLQ global score were significantly correlated (rho = 0.46; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A simple and quantitative method (VAS) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of severity of allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Rhinitis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index
14.
Med Mal Infect ; 37(3): 127-52, 2007 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17317063

ABSTRACT

A multidisciplinary panel of specialists and general practitioners provided definitions for the different forms of acute pediatric rhinosinusitis, with a description of the main symptoms and signs. They emphasized the role of concomitant systemic diseases, such as allergy and immunological disorders. Incidence, description, and management of complications are presented. They also provided the indications for radiological examination and microbiological investigations. The adequate medical management, particularly the place and the type of antibiotics, is analyzed and discussed, and guidelines for practical situations are suggested.


Subject(s)
Rhinitis/therapy , Sinusitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Child , France/epidemiology , Humans , Physicians, Family , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/epidemiology
15.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) ; 128(3): 173-7, 2007.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18323329

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To establish the ENT specialists's interest for the nasal obstruction measurement by the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) for the primary care medical management of patients with allergic rhinitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A nation wide mail survey was conducted on the whole set of 2,800 French ENT specialists. Physicians had to use the PNIF in 4-consecutive patients with allergic rhinitis and assess through a questionnaire their interest for this tool. RESULTS: About 8% of all ENTs (n = 228) responded. 65.3% of them had used the PNIF with their 4 patients, 29.7% used it in only 1 to 3 of their patients, and 5% did not use it at all. The PNIF was mainly used in moderate to severe rhinitis (94%) in contrast with mild rhinitis (32%) and in persistent rhinitis (94.2%) compared to intermittent rhinitis (54.8%). The primary motivation to use the PNIF on a systematic basis was to quantitatively assess nasal obstruction and to obtain an objective measurement of nasal obstruction. Conversely, the reasons for not using the PNIF were the needless of an objective measurement of nasal obstruction, the drawback of the PNIF in the patient physician relationship and lack of patient's acceptance of the device. Most physicians considered training for a correct usage of the PNIF was easy. Finally, about 2 thirds of the sample gave a positive rating on the usefulness of the PNIF for their patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the interest of the practitioners to dispose of a simple and reliable tool for the follow up of nasal obstruction in allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Inspiratory Capacity/physiology , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Lung Volume Measurements/instrumentation , Nasal Obstruction/diagnosis , Nasal Obstruction/physiopathology , Otolaryngology , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prospective Studies , Treatment Refusal
16.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) ; 128(3): 187-92, 2007.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18323331

ABSTRACT

Sinusitis or acute rhinosinusitis, is defined as an acute viral or bacterial infection characterised by inflammation of the mucosa of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Although antibiotics are routinely prescribed for the treatment of acute sinusitis, most cases are caused by viral infections and will resolve without antibiotic therapy. Given concerns about global antibacterial resistance, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend a conservative approach to antibiotic treatment, with mild or moderately severe acute sinusitis managed symptomatically. Intranasal corticosteroids act on the nasal mucosa to relieve inflammation and its associated symptoms, and may be a useful symptomatic treatment option. Two randomised, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that the corticosteroid mometasone furoate, administered as a nasal spray (MFNS), is effective as an adjunct to antibiotics in acute sinusitis. The design of these studies show a therapeutic approach known in Europe, but this attitude is still different from the current French guidelines. Furthermore, the efficacy and safety of MFNS monotherapy has been compared with antibiotic therapy in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with acute uncomplicated sinusitis and probably viral. In this study, twice-daily (BID) MFNS 200 microg produced statistically greater improvements in overall symptoms and most individual symptoms compared with amoxicillin or placebo, even though Amoxicillin is not the one recommended by the French guidelines for this indication. These findings suggest that MFNS may play an important role in the management of acute sinusitis, either as monotherapy or as adjunctive treatment to antibiotics. These results lead also to think over its interest in the treatment of uncomplicated common forms of sinusitis, where antibiotics are still widely prescribed in daily practice.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnadienediols/therapeutic use , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Aerosols , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Mometasone Furoate , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Placebos , Pregnadienediols/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Safety , Treatment Outcome
18.
Med Mycol ; 44(1): 61-7, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16805094

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, we have observed a high frequency of Aspergillus rhinosinusitis in french medical centers. The epidemiological data, clinical presentations, radiology, mycology and histology results of 173 consecutive patients with paranasal sinus fungus balls who were admitted from 1989 to 2002 have been reviewed. The most common symptoms included purulent nasal discharges and nasal obstructions, with the maxillary sinus being the most common site of infection (152 cases, 87.8%). Computed tomography scans (CT scan) were performed in 92% (159/173) of the cases and heterogeneous opacities were observed in 132 patients (83%). Histology examinations were performed in all cases and proved positive in 162 patients. Fungi were recovered, mainly Aspergillus fumigatus, from samples of 50 patients, while specimens from the remaining 123 patients were negative. Since no specific clinical sign could be found, a diagnosis of fungus ball is frequently made after a long term symptomatic period. CT scan findings of metallic or calcified densities within an opacified sinus cavity are highly suggestive of a fungus ball, but mycological and histological studies are essential to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment consisted of functional endonasal sinus surgery and was successful in 172 out of 173 cases.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis/diagnosis , Aspergillosis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aspergillosis/microbiology , Aspergillosis/therapy , Aspergillus fumigatus/isolation & purification , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paranasal Sinuses/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Sinusitis/microbiology , Sinusitis/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
19.
Int J Clin Pract ; 60(2): 190-200, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16451293

ABSTRACT

Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), which manifests as an inflammation of at least one of the paranasal sinuses, is a major public health issue in developed countries. Diagnosis and treatment of ABRS can pose significant challenges in clinical practice, including difficulty in differentiation between viral and bacterial infection and a lack of simple, reliable and convenient methods for definitive diagnosis. Treatment choice is also a challenge because a decision is typically made empirically; therefore, the selection of therapy should be based on knowledge of local patterns of antimicrobial resistance, spectrum of activity against the most common ABRS pathogens (including those that are resistant to penicillins and macrolides) and pharmacodynamic potency. Current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of ABRS in various countries share some similarities but also have important differences. Criteria for making the clinical diagnosis of sinusitis vary only slightly from country to country, while recommendations of therapy reflect the local impact of bacterial resistance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Decision Making , Forecasting , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/diagnosis
20.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) ; 127(4): 195-201, 2006.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17315782

ABSTRACT

STUDY AIM: Incidence and distribution of severe infectious complications of bacterial rhinosinusitis are mostly unknown in adults. Our objective was to describe these complications, the patients clinical background, the relevant bacteria, their therapeutic management and their evolution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From November 2001 to March 2003, this prospective and descriptive study recruited patients older than 13 years, immuno-competent and hospitalized in 6 French academic hospitals with severe acute complications of presumed-bacterial community acquired rhinosinusitis. RESULTS: Fourty three patients (40 +/- 18 years) were included. Fourty four per cent had an ENT history: Infectious rhinosinusitis (23%) and/or chronic rhinosinusitis (14%) and/or sinonasal surgery (19%). The initial sinusitis was either pansinusitis (24 cases) or an isolated sinusitis in 17 cases (missing data 2). The complication was either initial (15), or followed an infectious acute rhinosinusitis in 27 cases (1 missing data). In 39 cases, complications were isolated: Meningo-encephalic (16), orbital (15) and sub-cutaneous abscess (8). Seventy per cent of the swabs were positive, particularly with Haemophilus Influenzae and Streptococcus Pneumoniae in meningitis, Staphylococcus et Streptococcus species in orbital complications, and Staphylococcus species in sub-cutaneous locations. The initial management of the complication, combining systematic antibiotic therapy with surgery (31 patients), resulted in cure for 31 patients. The subsequent management of the 12 initial failures cured 10 more patients (of which 9 after surgery). CONCLUSION: This prospective study has shown the real risk of severe complications during any acute sinusitis and the need for early treatment often involving a surgery.


Subject(s)
Meningitis/microbiology , Orbital Diseases/microbiology , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/microbiology , Abscess/microbiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Female , Haemophilus Infections/complications , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...