Possible risk for re-colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by faecal transmission.

An increase in the frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as an important causative agent of nosocomial infections is observed worldwide. Unfortunately, in spite of optimal hygienic conditions (barrier isolation, screening, decontamination), patients often remain MRSA positive or are detected as "re-colonized" at readmission. The objective of our study was to clarify if this is due to an undetected colonization of the gastrointestinal tract, which could possibly lead to re-colonization after primary successful decontamination. Therefore, all MRSA strains were collected from 290 in-patients of a university hospital over a period of 2 years. A surprisingly high number (24.1% of all) was isolated from stool samples. Even 13.1% of the total collection could be first observed in this material before detecting MRSA in other materials of these patients. To evaluate the epidemiology of these isolates, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used. On the basis of PFGE restriction types one main clone and 11 singular clones could be identified. Additionally, for six individual patients MRSA isolates from stool specimens were indistinguishable from other isolates from different locations. We show here that colonization of the gastrointestinal tract with MRSA apparently could play an important role in spreading MRSA via faecal contamination. Hence, we suggest that stool colonization with MRSA could be the source of a so far unrecognized transmission of MRSA within individual patients and within the population. Therefore, our findings imply a modification in the hygienic strategies for handling decontamination and therapy of MRSA patients.

Risk factors for bacterial catheter colonization in regional anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Although several potential risk factors have been discussed, risk factors associated with bacterial colonization or even infection of catheters used for regional anaesthesia are not very well investigated. METHODS: In this prospective observational trial, 198 catheters at several anatomical sites where placed using a standardized technique. The site of insertion was then monitored daily for signs of infection (secretion at the insertion site, redness, swelling, or local pain). The catheters were removed when clinically indicated (no or moderate postoperative pain) or when signs of potential infection occurred. After sterile removal they were prospectively analyzed for colonization, defined as > 15 colony forming units. RESULTS: 33 (16.7%) of all catheters were colonized, and 18 (9.1%) of these with additional signs of local inflammation. Two of these patients required antibiotic treatment due to superficial infections. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with catheter colonization. Out of 26 potential factors, three came out as statistically significant. Catheter placement in the groin (odds-ratio and 95%-confidence interval: 3.4; 1.5-7.8), and repeated changing of the catheter dressing (odds-ratio: 2.1; 1.4-3.3 per removal) increased the risk for colonization, whereas systemic antibiotics administered postoperatively decreased it (odds ratio: 0.41; 0.12-1.0). CONCLUSION: Colonization of peripheral and epidural nerve catheter can only in part be predicted at the time of catheter insertion since two out of three relevant variables that significantly influence the risk can only be recorded postoperatively. Catheter localisation in the groin, removal of the dressing and omission of postoperative antibiotics were associated with, but were not necessarily causal for bacterial colonization. These factors might help to identify patients who are at increased risk for catheter colonization.