A Modular RNA Domain That Confers Differential Ligand Specificity.

The modularity of protein domains is well-known, but the existence of independent domains that confer function in RNA is less established. Recently, a family of RNA aptamers termed ykkC was discovered; they bind at least four ligands of very different chemical composition, including guanidine, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP), and guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) (graphical abstract). Structures of these aptamers revealed an architecture characterized by two coaxial helical stacks. The first helix appears to be a generic scaffold, while the second helix forms the most contacts to the ligands. To determine if these two regions within the aptamer are modular units for ligand recognition, we swapped the ligand-binding coaxial stacks of a guanidine aptamer and a PRPP aptamer. This operation, in combination with a single mutation in the scaffold domain, achieved full switching of ligand specificity. This finding suggests that the ligand-binding helix largely dictates the ligand specificity of ykkC RNAs and that the scaffold coaxial stack is generally compatible with various ykkC ligand-binding modules. This work presents an example of RNA domain modularity comparable to that of a ligand-binding protein, showcasing the versatility of RNA as an entity capable of molecular evolution through adaptation of existing motifs.

Phylogenetic sequence analysis and functional studies reveal compensatory amino acid substitutions in loop 2 of human ribonucleotide reductase.

Eukaryotic class I ribonucleotide reductases (RRs) generate deoxyribonucleotides for DNA synthesis. Binding of dNTP effectors is coupled to the formation of active dimers and induces conformational changes in a short loop (loop 2) to regulate RR specificity among its nucleoside diphosphate substrates. Moreover, ATP and dATP bind at an additional allosteric site 40 Å away from loop 2 and thereby drive formation of activated or inactive hexamers, respectively. To better understand how dNTP binding influences specificity, activity, and oligomerization of human RR, we aligned >300 eukaryotic RR sequences to examine natural sequence variation in loop 2. We found that most amino acids in eukaryotic loop 2 were nearly invariant in this sample; however, two positions co-varied as nonconservative substitutions (N291G and P294K; human numbering). We also found that the individual N291G and P294K substitutions in human RR additively affect substrate specificity. The P294K substitution significantly impaired effector-induced oligomerization required for enzyme activity, and oligomerization was rescued in the N291G/P294K enzyme. None of the other mutants exhibited altered ATP-mediated hexamerization; however, certain combinations of loop 2 mutations and dNTP effectors perturbed ATP's role as an allosteric activator. Our results demonstrate that the observed compensatory covariation of amino acids in eukaryotic loop 2 is essential for its role in dNTP-induced dimerization. In contrast, defects in substrate specificity are not rescued in the double mutant, implying that functional sequence variation elsewhere in the protein is necessary. These findings yield insight into loop 2's roles in regulating RR specificity, allostery, and oligomerization.

Nucleoside Analogue Triphosphates Allosterically Regulate Human Ribonucleotide Reductase and Identify Chemical Determinants That Drive Substrate Specificity.

Class I ribonucleotide reductase (RR) maintains balanced pools of deoxyribonucleotide substrates for DNA replication by converting ribonucleoside diphosphates (NDPs) to 2'-deoxyribonucleoside diphosphates (dNDPs). Binding of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) effectors (ATP/dATP, dGTP, and dTTP) modulates the specificity of class I RR for CDP, UDP, ADP, and GDP substrates. Crystal structures of bacterial and eukaryotic RRs show that dNTP effectors and NDP substrates bind on either side of a flexible nine-amino acid loop (loop 2). Interactions with the effector nucleobase alter loop 2 geometry, resulting in changes in specificity among the four NDP substrates of RR. However, the functional groups proposed to drive specificity remain untested. Here, we use deoxynucleoside analogue triphosphates to determine the nucleobase functional groups that drive human RR (hRR) specificity. The results demonstrate that the 5-methyl, O4, and N3 groups of dTTP contribute to specificity for GDP. The O6 and protonated N1 of dGTP direct specificity for ADP. In contrast, the unprotonated N1 of adenosine is the primary determinant of ATP/dATP-directed specificity for CDP. Structural models from X-ray crystallography of eukaryotic RR suggest that the side chain of D287 in loop 2 is involved in binding of dGTP and dTTP, but not dATP/ATP. This feature is consistent with experimental results showing that a D287A mutant of hRR is deficient in allosteric regulation by dGTP and dTTP, but not ATP/dATP. Together, these data define the effector functional groups that are the drivers of human RR specificity and provide constraints for evaluating models of allosteric regulation.