New onset of diabetes after transplantation is associated with improved patient survival after liver transplantation due to confounding factor.

BACKGROUND: The influence of NODAT on survival of liver transplant recipients has not been clarified. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of NODAT on survival in LT recipients. METHODS: Data from 352 LT patients were totally analyzed. 97 patients with pretransplant diabetes mellitus were excluded, and 255 patients without diabetes mellitus at time of transplantation were included. RESULTS: NODAT was diagnosed in 41 patients (16.1%). There was no difference in frequency of NODAT according to the etiology of liver cirrhosis. NODAT was associated with a higher body weight (p=0.004) and BMI (p=0.002) 5years after LT, but not with weight gain (p=0.201) or increase in BMI (p=0.335) 5years after LT. HbA1c 5years after LT was significantly higher in patients with NODAT (p=0.001), but mean HbA1c still remained lower than 6.5% (6.4(±1.2) %). Patients with NODAT showed better survival rates (log rank: p=0.002) compared to LT recipients without diabetes. According to all existing knowledge of diabetes mellitus (DM) better survival cannot be a direct effect of this disease. Our results are rather influenced by an not known confounding factor (possibly recovery from cachexia) associated with better survival and NODAT, while complications of NODAT will not appear during the relatively short postoperative time and observation period (mean follow up 6.08 (±2.67) years). CONCLUSION: NODAT is frequently diagnosed in LT recipients and is associated with an improved 5year survival after LT due to a not exactly known confounding factor.

Preoperative left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with reduced patient survival after liver transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been described in the context of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. The influence of LVH on survival of liver transplant (LT) recipients has not been clarified. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of LVH on survival in LT recipients. In total, data from 352 LT patients were analyzed. LVH was diagnosed by echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular wall thickness before LT. Patients were followed up for a mean of 4.2 yr. LVH was diagnosed in 135 (38.4%) patients. Patients with LVH had significantly more frequently male gender (p = 0.046), diastolic dysfunction (p < 0.001), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; p = 0.004). Furthermore, LVH patients were older (p < 0.001) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; p = 0.001). There was no difference in frequency of arterial hypertension, pre-transplant diabetes mellitus, or etiology of liver cirrhosis. Patients without LVH had a better survival (log rank: p = 0.05) compared with LVH patients. In a multivariate Cox regression LVH (p = 0.031), end-stage renal disease (ESRD; p = 0.003) and lack of arterial hypertension (p = 0.004) but not MELD score (p = 0.885) were associated with poorer survival. CONCLUSION: LVH is frequently diagnosed in patients on the waiting list and influences survival after LT.