"Prophylactic" transanal irrigation (TAI) to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal resection: results at 12-month follow-up of a controlled randomized multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is associated with a severe negative impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). In a recent prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) by our group, early ("prophylactic") use of transanal irrigation (TAI) following rectal resection for rectal cancer was shown to improve symptoms associated with LARS significantly compared with a group under supportive therapy (ST) within 1 and 3 months following closure of the protective ileostomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome after 12 months when patients had the option to choose between the two therapeutic options and/or modify the regimen of TAI (volume and time). METHODS: In the RCT, 18 patients had been allocated to start with TAI following ileostomy closure, while 19 patients remained on ST only. Once the 3-month follow-up had been completed patients could choose between TAI or ST, respectively, and were invited for follow-up after 12 months. The maximum number of bowel movements during the day and the Wexner and LARS score as well as physical (PC) and mental (MC) component of the SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated. Furthermore, in patients who had changed their treatment arm, reasons for this decision were reported. RESULTS: Six patients were lost to follow-up (all in the ST group). One patient from the ST group started with TAI due to problems associated with LARS, bringing the total number of TAI patients to 19. Nine patients from the previous TAI arm changed to ST due to the long duration of the emptying process (n: 8) or pain during TAI (n: 1), respectively. After 12 months, the median volume of water used for irrigation was 600 ml (range 200-1000 ml). The ten patients who continued with TAI patients showed a lower number of defecation episodes per daytime (TAI median 3; 1-6, ST median 5; 2-10, p: 0.018) and per night (TAI median 0; 0-1, ST median 1; 0-5, p: 0.004) compared to the ST group. Although the LARS score was lower in patients who used TAI after 12 months (TAI median 18; 9-32, ST median 30; 3-39), this failed to reach the level of significance (p: 0.063). Evaluation of the Wexner score and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey as well as comparison of patients who remained on TAI (n: 9) versus those who had stopped TAI after 3 months (n: 9) failed to find any statistically significant difference between TAI and ST. CONCLUSIONS: This follow-up study revealed that a considerable number of patients decided to stop TAI within 12 months. However, the number of bowel movements during the day were still lower when TAI was used than when patients had ST only. CATEGORY: Randomized trial. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011752, https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/ .

Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: In advanced minimally invasive surgery the laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) quality can influence the flow of the operation. This study aimed to investigate the applicability of a scoring system for LCN (SALAS score) in colorectal surgery and whether an adequate scoring can be achieved using a specified sequence of the operation. METHODS: The score was assessed by four blinded raters using synchronized video and voice recordings of 20 randomly selected laparoscopic colorectal surgeries (group A: assessment of the entire operation; group B: assessment of the 2nd and 3rd quartile). Experience in LCN was defined as at least 100 assistances in complex laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS: The surgical teams consisted of three residents, three fellows, and two attendings forming 15 different teams. The ratio between experienced and inexperienced camera assistants was balanced (n = 11 vs. n = 9). Regarding the total SALAS score, the four raters discriminated between experienced and inexperienced camera assistants, regardless of their group assignment (group A, p < 0.05; group B, p < 0.05). The score's interrater variability and reliability were proven with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88. No statistically relevant correlation was achieved between operation time and SALAS score. CONCLUSION: This study presents the first intraoperative, objective, and structured assessment of LCN in colorectal surgery. We could demonstrate that the SALAS score is a reliable tool for the assessment of LCN even when only the middle part (50%) of the procedure is analyzed. Construct validity was proven by discriminating between experienced and inexperienced camera assistants.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly being applied as treatment for esophageal cancer. In this study, the results of 50 RAMIE procedures were compared with 50 conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) operations, which had been the standard treatment for esophageal cancer prior to the robotic era. Between April 2016 and March 2018, data of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively collected. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using an identical intrathoracic anastomotic reconstruction technique with the same perioperative management and pain control regimen. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were graded according to definitions stated by the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group. Data analysis was carried out with and without propensity score matching. Baseline characteristics did not show significant differences between the RAMIE and MIE group. Propensity score matching of the initial group of 100 patients resulted in two equal groups of 40 patients for each surgical approach. In the RAMIE group, the median total lymph node yield was 27 (range 13-84) compared to 23 in the MIE group (range 11-48), P = 0.053. Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 1 day (range 1-43) in the RAMIE group compared to 2 days (range 1-17) in the MIE group (P = 0.029). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.581). In this propensity-matched study comparing RAMIE to MIE, ICU stay was significantly shorter in the RAMIE group. There was a trend in improved lymphadenectomy in RAMIE.

Randomized clinical trial of prophylactic transanal irrigation versus supportive therapy to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection.

Background: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent problem after rectal resection. Transanal irrigation (TAI) has been suggested as an effective treatment in patients who have developed LARS. This prospective RCT was undertaken to evaluate the effect of TAI as a prophylactic treatment to prevent symptoms of LARS. Methods: Patients who had undergone ultralow rectal resection were randomized to start TAI on a daily basis, or to serve as a control with supportive therapy only after ileostomy closure. All patients were seen after 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and the maximum number of defaecation episodes per day and night documented during follow-up. Wexner score, LARS score and Short Form 36 questionnaire responses were evaluated in both groups. Results: Thirty-seven patients could be evaluated according to protocol (TAI 18, control 19). The maximum number of stool episodes per day and per night was significantly lower among patients who underwent TAI at 1 month (median 3 versus 7 episodes/day in TAI versus control group, P = 0·003; 0 versus 3 episodes/night, P = 0·001) and 3 months (3 versus 5 episodes per day, P = 0·006; 0 versus 1 episodes/night, P = 0·002). LARS scores were significantly better in the TAI group after 1 month (median 16 versus 32 in control group; P = 0·044) and 3 months (9 versus 31; P = 0·001). A significantly better result in terms of Wexner score was seen in the TAI group after 3 months (median 2 versus 6 in controls; P = 0·046). Conclusion: Prophylactic TAI led to a significantly better functional outcome compared with supportive therapy for up to 3 months. Registration number: DRKS00011752 ( http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/).

[Lymphadenectomy in oncological visceral surgery-Part 2 : Cancer of the upper and lower intestinal tract]. / Lymphadenektomie in der onkologischen Viszeralchirurgie ­ Teil 2 : Karzinome des oberen und unteren Intestinaltraktes.

In cancers of the upper and lower intestinal tract the risk of lymphatic metastases depends on the histological results, tumor grading, and depth of tumor infiltration (T-stage). Pretherapeutic staging is of particular importance for determining the surgical strategy (local excision vs. en bloc resection with regional lymphadenectomy) as well as for evaluating the necessity of neoadjuvant therapy. While the first part on "Lymphadenectomy in oncological visceral surgery" focused on hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer, this second part contains an overview of anatomical conditions of lymphatic drainage of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine, colon, rectum and anus. Based on this, the principles and techniques of lymphadenectomy for cancer in these organs and the requirements on systematic regional lymphadenectomy in the actual TNM classification (8th edition) are discussed.

Structured assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skills: the SALAS score.

BACKGROUND: Tools are needed to assess laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) in the operating room. Here, we aimed to develop an objective rating scale for LCN. STUDY DESIGN: We defined the following key aspects of LCN: operational field centering, correct angle of the horizon, correct instrument visualization, verbal commands from the operating surgeon, and manual corrections from the operating surgeon. We then developed a score based on intraoperative error evaluation from intraoperative recordings of 80 procedures. Finally, the newly developed score was validated by four different raters using video-based analysis of 20 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies. RESULTS: We developed and validated a tool for the structured assessment of laparoscopic assistant skills (SALAS). This score showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of > 0.7. Intraclass correlation revealed a low interrater variability (ICC 0.866) for the total score. Comparison of experienced and inexperienced camera assistants revealed significantly better SALAS scores for experienced assistants (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our present results show that SALAS score is valid, reliable, and practicable. This score can be used for future investigations of camera navigation efficiency and training.

Internal anal sphincter nerves - a macroanatomical and microscopic description of the extrinsic autonomic nerve supply of the internal anal sphincter.

AIM: The internal anal sphincter (IAS) contributes substantially to anorectal functions. While its autonomic nerve supply has been studied at the microscopic level, little information is available concerning the macroscopic topography of extrinsic nerve fibres. This study was designed to identify neural connections between the pelvic plexus and the IAS, provide a detailed topographical description, and give histological proof of autonomic nerve tissue. METHODS: Macroscopic dissection of pelvic autonomic nerves was performed under magnification in seven (five male, two female) hemipelvises obtained from body donors (67-92 years). Candidate structures were investigated by histological and immunohistochemical staining protocols to visualize nerve tissue. RESULTS: Nerve fibres could be traced from the anteroinferior edge of the pelvic plexus to the anorectal junction running along the neurovascular bundle anterolaterally to the rectum and posterolaterally to the prostate/vagina. Nerve fibres penetrated the longitudinal rectal muscle layer just above the fusion with the levator ani muscle (conjoint longitudinal muscle) and entered the intersphincteric space to reach the IAS. Histological and immunohistochemical findings confirmed the presence of nerve tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic nerve fibres supplying the IAS emerge from the pelvic plexus and are distinct to nerves entering the rectum via the lateral pedicles. Thus, they should be classified as IAS nerves. The identification and precise topographical location described provides a basis for nerve-sparing rectal resection procedures and helps to prevent postoperative functional anorectal disorders.

Establishing PNB-qPCR for quantifying minimal ctDNA concentrations during tumour resection.

The analysis of blood plasma or serum as a non-invasive alternative to tissue biopsies is a much-pursued goal in cancer research. Various methods and approaches have been presented to determine a patient's tumour status, chances of survival, and response to therapy from serum or plasma samples. We established PNB-qPCR (Pooled, Nested, WT-Blocking qPCR), a highly specific nested qPCR with various modifications to detect and quantify minute amounts of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from very limited blood plasma samples. PNB-qPCR is a nested qPCR technique combining ARMS primers, blocking primers, LNA probes, and pooling of multiple first round products for sensitive quantification of the seven most frequent point mutations in KRAS exon 2. Using this approach, we were able to characterize ctDNA and total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) kinetics by selective amplification of KRAS mutated DNA fragments in the blood plasma over the course of tumour resection and the surrounding days. Whereas total cfDNA concentrations increased over the surgical and regenerative process, ctDNA levels showed a different scheme, rising only directly after tumour resection and about three days after the surgery. For the first time, we present insights into the impact of surgery on the release of ctDNA and total cfDNA.

[Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for primary rectal cancer : Video article]. / Transanale totale mesorektale Exzision (TaTME) bei primärem Rektumkarzinom : Videobeitrag.

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a new surgical technique in the treatment of selected patients with rectal cancer. This manuscript and the accompanying video report with commentary, which is available online, outlines various equipment requirements and step by step aspects of the surgical technique. With respect to the implementation of TaTME particular attention should be paid to the topography and surgical education.

Transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation for intraoperative verification of internal anal sphincter innervation.

BACKGROUND: The current standard for pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring (pIONM) is based on intermittent direct nerve stimulation. This study investigated the potential use of transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation for non-invasive verification of pelvic autonomic nerves. METHODS: A consecutive series of six pigs underwent low anterior rectal resection. For transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation, an array of ten electrodes (cathodes) was placed over the sacral foramina (S2 to S4). Anodes were applied on the back, right and left thigh, lower abdomen, and intra-anally. Stimulation using the novel method and current standard were performed at different phases of the experiments under electromyography of the autonomic innervated internal anal sphincter (IAS). KEY RESULTS: Transcutaneous stimulation induced increase of IAS activity could be observed in each animal under specific cathode-anode configurations. Out of 300 tested configurations, 18 exhibited a change in the IAS activity correlated with intentional autonomic nerve damage. The damage resulted in a significant decrease of the relative area under the curve of the IAS frequency spectrum (P<.001). Comparison of the IAS spectra under transcutaneous and direct stimulation revealed no significant difference (after rectal resection: median 5.99 µV•Hz vs 7.78 µV•Hz, P=.12; after intentional nerve damage: median -0.27 µV•Hz vs 3.35 µV•Hz, P=.29). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Non-invasive selective transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation could be used for verification of IAS innervation.

[Minimally invasive approaches for transanal surgery]. / Minimalinvasive Optionen bei transanalen Eingriffen.

Since the introduction of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in the 1980 s, the minimally invasive transanal approach has been a treatment option for selected patients with colorectal diseases. Recently, transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) was introduced as an alternative technique. TAMIS is a hybrid between TEM and single-port laparoscopy and was followed by introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Although the TaTME experience remains preliminary, it appears to be an attractive minimally invasive procedure for carefully selected patients with resectable rectal cancer. The objective of this review is to describe the latest technologies which enhanced progress of minimally invasive transanal approaches for endo- and extraluminal surgery in this area of colorectal surgery.

["I will do laparoscopy somewhere else" : Total, highly immersive virtual reality without side effects?] / "Ich laparoskopier' dann woanders weiter" : Totale, hochimmersive virtuelle Realität ohne Nebenwirkungen?

BACKGROUND: For virtual reality laparosopic simulation we developed a new, highly immersive simulation mode. The goal of the current pilot study was to investigate if kinetosis or other negative vegetative side effects can be caused by a total virtual training set-up (TVRL). METHODS: In this study 20 participants with varying degrees of expertise in laparoscopy performed 3 tasks (i.e. ring exchange, fine dissection and cholecystectomy) in regular (VRL) and immersive mode (TVRL) with a head-mounted display (HMD) on a laparoscopic simulator. Aside from performance scores, the heart rate was recorded and the occurrence of vertigo was investigated. RESULTS: Surgical performance was independent of the VR mode (VRL or TVRL). Participants' heart rate was higher in TVRL without reaching statistical significance. Kinetosis occurred in two participants (10%) with a history of motion sickness. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic training can take place in a total virtual environment with limited nagative vegetative side effects. Special attention should be paid to participants with a history of motion sickness. The development of TVRL enables new perspectives for surgical training.

Laparoscopic assistance by operating room nurses: Results of a virtual-reality study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic assistance is often entrusted to a less experienced resident, medical student, or operating room nurse. Data regarding laparoscopic training for operating room nurses are not available. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse the initial performance level and learning curves of operating room nurses in basic laparoscopic surgery compared with medical students and surgical residents to determine their ability to assist with this type of procedure. DESIGN: The study was designed to compare the initial virtual reality performance level and learning curves of user groups to analyse competence in laparoscopic assistance. PARTICIPANTS: The study subjects were operating room nurses, medical students, and first year residents. METHODS: Participants performed three validated tasks (camera navigation, peg transfer, fine dissection) on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator three times in 3 consecutive days. Laparoscopic experts were enrolled as a control group. Participants filled out questionnaires before and after the course. RESULTS: Nurses and students were comparable in their initial performance (p>0.05). Residents performed better in camera navigation than students and nurses and reached the expert level for this task. Residents, students, and nurses had comparable bimanual skills throughout the study; while, experts performed significantly better in bimanual manoeuvres at all times (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The included user groups had comparable skills for bimanual tasks. Residents with limited experience reached the expert level in camera navigation. With training, nurses, students, and first year residents are equally capable of assisting in basic laparoscopic procedures.

[Training course transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) : Concept and establishment of a training course for safe application]. / Trainingskurs transanale totale mesorektale Exzision (TaTME) : Konzept und Realisation eines Trainingskurses zur sicheren Anwendung.

BACKGROUND: In recent years the video endoscopy-assisted transanal approach to total mesorectal excision (TME) combined with the conventional laparoscopic technique was developed as an alternative indication for treatment of low rectal cancer (TaTME). OBJECTIVE: The concept and results of the first German TaTME hands-on cadaver course with subsequent live surgery are presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 2­day training course was structured into an anatomical and a clinical surgery part. The participants could learn from basics to live surgery and shared their experiences during presentations about currently available data, rationale and technique of TaTME with special emphasis on technical failures and pitfalls. The supervised simulator training and TaTME exercises at three cadaver work stations were proctored by experienced surgeons. On day 2 the participants observed two cases of TaTME at the moderated live surgery session. RESULTS: The step-up learning curve for the transanal approach could be clearly observed in each team from warm-up to hands-on training sessions. In the practical session the participants could train the milestones of the transanal approach on cadavers, including the pitfalls. Finally, the participants observed live surgery on two patients with low rectal tumors on day 2 of the course. CONCLUSION: A step-up training course on cadavers is indispensable regarding implementation of techniques, such as TaTME into clinical practice. Coordinated clinical guest demonstrations provide translation of theoretical basic principles and practical skills from the cadaver course to real patient treatment. Participants should be encouraged to report their cases to registered trials or registries.

[Transparent operative training in visceral surgery : Analysis at a German university medical center]. / Transparente operative Weiterbildung in der Viszeralchirurgie : Analyse an einer deutschen Universitätsklinik.

BACKGROUND: Practical operative training in the discipline of visceral surgery is currently under discussion. Aside from surveys, data on this topic in Germany are sparse. The aim of the study was an objective collation of surgical residents' practical training in the operating room in our department. METHODS: All surgical cases from 2015 were prospectively included. Procedures were stratified into resident and non-resident operations and complex cases with sub-steps which could potentially be performed by residents. We analyzed whether an operation or surgical sub-steps were performed by a resident. If this was not achieved, the reasons were analyzed. An anonymous online survey was conducted among employees in the surgery department regarding surgical training. RESULTS: Out of 2896 surgical cases 1141 (39.4 %) were classified as potential resident training operations, which were actually performed by a resident in 743 cases (65.1 %). The survey showed an underestimation of this proportion, where sub-steps were assisted in 30.3 % (n = 265) of 876 potential cases. This proportion significantly increased during the observation period (p < 0.001); however, it was highly overestimated by residents as well as fellows and senior consultants. Often organizational reasons were responsible when resident operations or sub-steps were not performed by a trainee (13.1 % and 30.0 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: The monocentric analysis per se resulted in an improvement in practical surgical training. In the training environment, assisting with sub-steps provides a great potential. Multicenter studies are needed.

Continuous intraoperative monitoring of pelvic autonomic nerves during TME to prevent urogenital and anorectal dysfunction in rectal cancer patients (NEUROS): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Urinary, sexual and anorectal sequelae are frequent after rectal cancer surgery and were found to be related to intraoperative neurogenic impairment. Neuromonitoring methods have been developed to identify and preserve the complex pelvic autonomic nervous system in order to maintain patients' quality of life. So far no randomized study has been published dealing with the role of neuromonitoring in rectal cancer surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: NEUROS is a prospective two-arm randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial comparing the functional outcome in rectal cancer patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) with and without pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring (pIONM). A total of 188 patients will be included. Primary endpoint is the urinary function measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score. Secondary endpoints consist of sexual, anorectal functional outcome and safety, especially oncologic safety and quality of TME. Sexual function is assessed in females with the Female Sexual Function Index and in males with the International Index of Erectile Function. For evaluation of anorectal function the Wexner-Vaizey score is used. Functional evaluation is scheduled before radiochemotherapy (if applicable), preoperatively (baseline), before hospital discharge, 3 and 6 months after stoma closure and 12 months after surgery. For assessment of safety adverse events, the rates of positive resection margins and quality of mesorectum are documented. DISCUSSION: This study will provide high quality evidence on the efficacy of pIONM aiming for improvement of functional outcome in rectal cancer patients undergoing TME. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01585727 . Registration date is 04/25/2012.

Electrophysiology-based quality assurance of nerve-sparing in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: Is it worth the effort?

BACKGROUND: After low anterior resection for rectal cancer, visual assessment of pelvic autonomic nerve preservation can be difficult due to the complexity of neuroanatomy, as well as surgery- and patient-related factors. The present study aimed to evaluate nerve-sparing quality assurance using the laparoscopic neuromapping (LNM) technique. METHODS: We prospectively investigated a series of 30 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection. Nerve-sparing was evaluated both visually and electrophysiologically. LNM was performed using stimulation of pelvic autonomic nerves under simultaneous cystomanometry and processed electromyography of the internal anal sphincter. Urogenital and anorectal functions were evaluated using validated and standardized questionnaires preoperatively, at short-term follow-up, and at mid-term follow-up at a median of 9 months (range 6-12 months) after surgery. RESULTS: One patient reported new onset of urinary dysfunction, and another patient reported new onset of anorectal dysfunction. Of the 20 sexually active patients, five reported sexual dysfunction. Visual assessment by laparoscopy confirmed complete nerve preservation in 28 of 30 cases. For prediction of urinary and anorectal function, LNM sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were each 100 %. LNM with combined assessment for prediction of sexual function yielded a sensitivity of 80 %, specificity of 93 %, positive predictive value of 80 %, negative predictive value of 93 %, and overall accuracy of 90 %. CONCLUSIONS: LNM is an appropriate method for reliable quality assurance of laparoscopic nerve-sparing.

[Appendectomy in surgical residency. What has changed over the past 10 years?]. / Weiterbildungseingriff Appendektomie. Was hat sich in 10 Jahren geändert?

BACKGROUND: Surgical residents need to train laparoscopic skills for minimally invasive procedures at an early stage. The aim of this study was the investigation and assessment of appendectomy carried out at a university medical center over the previous decade regarding the frequency of operations by residents in training and the type of surgical technique used (laparoscopic vs. open). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of appendectomies carried out from 2005 to 2014 at the clinic for general, visceral and transplant surgery was performed. Operators were stratified into two groups (group 1: residents and group 2: fellows/attending surgeons). Surgery was classified as laparoscopic or open appendectomy. RESULTS: Out of 1,587 appendectomies analyzed 946 were performed laparoscopically (59.6 %). The percentage of laparoscopic appendectomies increased significantly over the decade analyzed (p < 0.001) and reached 94.4 % in 2014. From 2005 until 2007 the rate of appendectomies by residents was 17.9 % (77 out of 430). Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 5.8 % and was only performed by fellows or attending surgeons. From 2008 to 2014 the rate of surgeries by residents significantly increased (p < 0.001) and accounted for 57.6 % (range 19.4-66.9 %). CONCLUSION: Regardless of the surgical technique used, appendectomy is still a primary training operation for surgical residents. An early and focused training of minimally invasive visceral surgery in the new regulations for continuing medical education starts with laparoscopic appendectomy.

[3D Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulation in Surgical Education - Results of a Pilot Study]. / Virtuelle 3-D-Laparoskopie-Simulation in der chirurgischen Aus- und Weiterbildung - Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie.

BACKGROUND: The use of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy is a growing issue and has led to 3D systems in laparoscopic simulation. Studies on box trainers have shown differing results concerning the benefit of 3D imaging. There are currently no studies analysing 3D imaging in virtual reality laparoscopy (VRL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five surgical fellows, 10 surgical residents and 29 undergraduate medical students performed abstract and procedural tasks on a VRL simulator using conventional 2D and 3D imaging in a randomised order. RESULTS: No significant differences between the two imaging systems were shown for students or medical professionals. Participants who preferred three-dimensional imaging showed significantly better results in 2D as wells as in 3D imaging. DISCUSSION: First results on three-dimensional imaging on box trainers showed different results. Some studies resulted in an advantage of 3D imaging for laparoscopic novices. This study did not confirm the superiority of 3D imaging over conventional 2D imaging in a VRL simulator. CONCLUSION: In the present study on 3D imaging on a VRL simulator there was no significant advantage for 3D imaging compared to conventional 2D imaging.