Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Exp Brain Res ; 236(10): 2619-2626, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29968178

ABSTRACT

We tested the hypothesis that random variations in the magnitude of sinusoidal linear acceleration cause greater modulation of skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA), but not muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), than sinusoidal stimuli of the same frequency but constant amplitude. Subjects (n = 22) were seated in a sealed room mounted on a linear motor that could deliver peak sinusoidal accelerations of 30 mG in the antero-posterior direction. Subjects sat on a padded chair with their neck and head supported vertically, thereby minimizing somatosensory cues, facing the direction of motion in the anterior direction. Each block of sinusoidal motion was delivered at 0.2 Hz, either with a constant-amplitude (root mean square 14 mG) or randomly fluctuating amplitudes of the same mean amplitude. MSNA (n = 12) and SSNA (n = 10) were recorded via tungsten microelectrodes inserted into muscle or cutaneous fascicles of the common peroneal nerve. Cross-correlation analysis was used to measure the magnitude of vestibular modulation. The modulation index for SSNA was significantly higher during delivery of random vs constant-amplitude acceleration (31.4 ± 1.9 vs 24.5 ± 2.5%), but there was no significant difference in the modulation indices for MSNA (28.8 ± 2.9 vs 33.4 ± 4.1%). We conclude that the pattern of vestibular stimulation affects the magnitude of modulation of sympathetic outflow to skin but not to muscle. Presumably, this is related to the subperceptual development of nausea, which is known to be associated with greater vestibular modulation of SSNA but not MSNA.


Subject(s)
Acceleration , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Skin/innervation , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiology , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiology , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
2.
J Neurophysiol ; 120(2): 452-467, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668385

ABSTRACT

Muscle spindles are ubiquitous encapsulated mechanoreceptors found in most mammalian muscles. There are two types of endings, primary and secondary, and both are sensitive to changes in muscle length and velocity, with the primary endings having a greater dynamic sensitivity. Unlike other mechanoreceptors in the somatosensory system, muscle spindles are unique in possessing motor innervation, via γ-motoneurons (fusimotor neurons), that control their sensitivity to stretch. Much of what we know about human muscles spindles comes from studying the behavior of their afferents via intraneural microelectrodes (microneurography) inserted into accessible peripheral nerves. We review the functional properties of human muscle spindles, comparing and contrasting with what we know about the functions of muscle spindles studied in experimental animals. As in the cat, many human muscle spindles possess a background discharge that is related to the degree of muscle stretch, but mean firing rates are much lower (~10 Hz). They can faithfully encode changes in muscle fascicle length in passive conditions, but higher level extraction of information is required by the central nervous system to measure changes in muscle length during muscle contraction. Moreover, although there is some evidence supporting independent control of human muscle spindles via fusimotor neurons, any effects are modest compared with the clearly independent control of fusimotor neurons observed in the cat.


Subject(s)
Muscle Spindles/physiology , Action Potentials , Animals , Humans , Motor Neurons, Gamma/physiology , Muscle Contraction , Muscle Spindles/anatomy & histology , Muscle Spindles/innervation , Neurons, Afferent/physiology , Proprioception/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...