ABSTRACT
Research concerning therapeutic alliance and outcome is prevalent but relies heavily on data from individual treatment. In this article, the authors present data from cases in which an individual was seen and cases in which a couple was seen in order to investigate differences in therapeutic alliance and its trajectory depending on case type, therapist experience, and therapist sex. Participants included 96 couples and 52 individuals with 15 therapists from a large Midwestern training clinic for couple and family therapy. Data include the use of the Working Alliance Inventory-Shortened Version, and three-level models were estimated using hierarchical linear modeling. The results highlight differences in the trajectories of individual and couple clients' therapeutic alliance, including evidence for a curvilinear trend in work scores for individual clients but not couple clients. The results also highlight differences in the sources of variation for couple cases versus individual cases. There is clearly complexity in the building of alliance with clients in general, and even more so with couple clients.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Couples Therapy/methods , Interpersonal Relations , Models, Psychological , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/psychology , Professional-Patient Relations , Adult , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Marital Therapy/methods , Midwestern United States , Psychotherapy, Brief/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
The study uses 457 clients to investigate the impact of initial client factors on the development of therapeutic alliance. Data were collected longitudinally over the early portion of treatment. Cases included both individual and couple clients, allowing for examination of differences by case type. The study used the Working Alliance Inventory-Shortened Version (Tracey & Kokotovic, 1989) to measure therapeutic alliance. Initial factors considered included age, differentiation levels, prior stress, and depression. Couple clients showed differences from individual clients, and the variability prompted further investigation into relationship satisfaction and commitment as factors influencing the development of therapeutic alliance. Results highlight the increased complexity of developing an alliance with couples, and recommendations are provided for clinicians.
