ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To define and grade neurosurgical and spinal postoperative complications based on their need for treatment. METHODS: Complications were defined as any deviation from the normal postoperative course occurring within 30 days of surgery. A four-grade scale was proposed based on the therapy used to treat the complications: grade I, any non-life-threatening complications treated without invasive procedures; grade II, complications requiring invasive management such as surgical, endoscopic, and endovascular procedures; grade III, life-threatening adverse events requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU); and grade IV, deaths as a result of complications. Each grade was classified as a surgical or medical complication. An observational test of this system was conducted between January 2008 and December 2009 in a cohort of 1190 patients at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. RESULTS: Of 167 complications, 129 (10.84%) were classified as surgical, and 38 (3.19%) were classified as medical complications. Grade I (mild) complications accounted for 31.73%, grade II (moderate) complications accounted for 25.74%, and grade III (severe) complications accounted for 34.13%. The overall mortality rate was 1.17%; 0.84% of deaths were directly related to surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a simple, practical, and easy to reproduce way to report negative outcomes based on the therapy administered to treat a complication. The main advantages of this classification are the ability to compare surgical results among different centers and times, the ability to compare medical and surgical complications, and the ability to perform future meta-analyses.
Subject(s)
Neurosurgery/classification , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/classification , Anesthesia , Argentina/epidemiology , Brain/surgery , Cohort Studies , Critical Care , Humans , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Reoperation , Spinal Cord/surgery , Spine/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective. Stereotactic CT-guided biopsy is a safe procedure for the diagnosis of brain lesions unsuitable for surgical treatment because of their location, number, histology or poor medical status. The objective of this study is to analyze the indications,demography, topography, anatomopathologic diagnosis and complications in a series of stereotactic CT-guided brain biopsies. Method. 192 CT assisted stereotactic brain biopsies in 186 patients were retrospectively reviewed from june 1998 to june of 2008. Results. 186 patients, 101males (54.3%) and 85 females (45.7%), were analyzed. Mean age was 54.5 years. 144 (75%) of the biopsies were performed in hemispheric lesions, 43 (22.4%) in deep seated localization. The most frequent anatomopathologic diagnosis were glioblastoma (36,5%) and anaplasic astrocytoma (17%). 90,62% of the biopsies were positive, 7,3% were negative and 2,08% nondiagnostic. Morbility rate was 3,64% and mortality 2,08%. Conclusion.Stereotactic brain biopsy is a safe and effective procedure providing tissue for definitive anatomopathological diagnosis; it offers low morbidity and mortality rate. Our findings are similar to the literature.
Subject(s)
Biopsy , Brain Neoplasms , Tomography , Brain Injuries, TraumaticABSTRACT
Introduction. Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia remains a matter of debate since there are no studies comparing long term effectiveness of the different surgical techniques. We present our 10 year experience. Description. Series: 40 patients. Period: 1998 - 2008. Surgical techniques: microvascular decompression, radiofrequency thermorhizotomy and balloon compression. Analyzed parameters: age, sex, nerve root involved, pain relief, recurrence, complications, need to restart medication and reintervention. Discussion. Microvascular decompression offers better long term results, radiofrequency is adequate for special cases (higher recurrence rate), and balloon compression is better for V1 neuralgia. Our sample is too small for statistics, yet our findings are coincident with the literature. Conclusion. Better patient selection criteria for each technique are needed. Microvascular decompression should be the treatment of choice when possible. How to treat recurrence remains unanswered.
