Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 424, 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943204

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most patients starting chronic in-center hemodialysis (HD) receive conventional hemodialysis (CHD) with three sessions per week targeting specific biochemical clearance. Observational studies suggest that patients with residual kidney function can safely be treated with incremental prescriptions of HD, starting with less frequent sessions and later adjusting to thrice-weekly HD. This trial aims to show objectively that clinically matched incremental HD (CMIHD) is non-inferior to CHD in eligible patients. METHODS: An unblinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be conducted across diverse healthcare systems and dialysis organizations in the USA. Adult patients initiating chronic hemodialysis (HD) at participating centers will be screened. Eligibility criteria include receipt of fewer than 18 treatments of HD and residual kidney function defined as kidney urea clearance ≥3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine output ≥500 mL/24 h. The 1:1 randomization, stratified by site and dialysis vascular access type, assigns patients to either CMIHD (intervention group) or CHD (control group). The CMIHD group will be treated with twice-weekly HD and adjuvant pharmacologic therapy (i.e., oral loop diuretics, sodium bicarbonate, and potassium binders). The CHD group will receive thrice-weekly HD according to usual care. Throughout the study, patients undergo timed urine collection and fill out questionnaires. CMIHD will progress to thrice-weekly HD based on clinical manifestations or changes in residual kidney function. Caregivers of enrolled patients are invited to complete semi-annual questionnaires. The primary outcome is a composite of patients' all-cause death, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes. We aim to enroll 350 patients, which provides ≥85% power to detect an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.9 between CMIHD and CHD with an IRR non-inferiority of 1.20 (α = 0.025, one-tailed test, 20% dropout rate, average of 2.06 years of HD per patient participant), and 150 caregiver participants (of enrolled patients). DISCUSSION: Our proposal challenges the status quo of HD care delivery. Our overarching hypothesis posits that CMIHD is non-inferior to CHD. If successful, the results will positively impact one of the highest-burdened patient populations and their caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05828823. Registered on 25 April 2023.


Subject(s)
Multicenter Studies as Topic , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Equivalence Trials as Topic , United States , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis
2.
J Patient Exp ; 8: 23743735211065285, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34901415

ABSTRACT

Low health literacy in the chronic kidney disease population results in lower rates of pre-dialysis preparation and understanding of management to slow progression. The ABCs of Kidney Disease education class provided education in a more consistent manner outside of routine office visits. We aimed to study whether a structured education program would increase kidney disease-specific knowledge and healthcare involvement. Knowledge retention at least 6 months after the class assessed by the Kidney Disease Knowledge Surveys (KiKS) and healthcare involvement based on surveys sent to referring providers were found to have increased. Incorporation of a structured education program would be important for providers to improve long-term knowledge and lead to greater healthcare involvement. Providing an education class outside of the routine office visits will provide a greater impact on health literacy.

4.
Kidney360 ; 1(7): 631-639, 2020 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35372934

ABSTRACT

Background: Johns Hopkins was an early adopter of an in-house nephrology fellowship night float to improve work-life balance. Our study aimed to elucidate attitudes to guide fellowship structuring. Methods: We performed a mixed-methods study surveying Johns Hopkins fellows, alumni, and faculty and conducting one focus group of current fellows. Surveys were developed through literature review, queried on a five-point Likert scale, and analyzed with t and ANOVA tests. The focus group transcript was analyzed by two independent reviewers. Results: Survey response rates were 14 (100%) fellows, 32 (91%) alumni, and 17 (94%) faculty. All groups felt quality of patient care was good to excellent with no significant differences among groups (range of means [SD], 4.1 [0.7]-4.6 [0.7]; P=0.12), although fellows had a statistically significantly more positive view than faculty on autonomy (4.6 [0.5] versus 4.1 [0.3]; P=0.006). Fellows perceived a positive effect across all domains of night float on the day team experience (range, 4.2 [0.8]-4.6 [0.6]; P<0.001 compared with neutral effect). Focus group themes included patient care, care continuity, professional development, wellness, and structural components. One fellow said, "…my bias is that every program would switch to a night float system if they could." All groups were satisfied with night float with 4.7 [0.5], 4.2 [0.8], and 4.0 [0.9] for fellows, faculty, and alumni, respectively; fellows were most enthusiastic (P=0.03). All three groups preferred night float, and fellows did so unanimously. Conclusions: Night float was well liked and enhanced the perceived daytime fellow experience. Alumni and faculty were positive about night float, although less so, possibly due to concerns for adequate preparation to handle overnight calls after graduation. Night float implementation at other nephrology programs should be considered based on program resources; such changes should be assessed by similar methods.


Subject(s)
Fellowships and Scholarships , Nephrology , Continuity of Patient Care , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Work-Life Balance
5.
JAMA ; 322(13): 1294-1304, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31573641

ABSTRACT

Importance: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the 16th leading cause of years of life lost worldwide. Appropriate screening, diagnosis, and management by primary care clinicians are necessary to prevent adverse CKD-associated outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, end-stage kidney disease, and death. Observations: Defined as a persistent abnormality in kidney structure or function (eg, glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or albuminuria ≥30 mg per 24 hours) for more than 3 months, CKD affects 8% to 16% of the population worldwide. In developed countries, CKD is most commonly attributed to diabetes and hypertension. However, less than 5% of patients with early CKD report awareness of their disease. Among individuals diagnosed as having CKD, staging and new risk assessment tools that incorporate GFR and albuminuria can help guide treatment, monitoring, and referral strategies. Optimal management of CKD includes cardiovascular risk reduction (eg, statins and blood pressure management), treatment of albuminuria (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers), avoidance of potential nephrotoxins (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), and adjustments to drug dosing (eg, many antibiotics and oral hypoglycemic agents). Patients also require monitoring for complications of CKD, such as hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperphosphatemia, vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and anemia. Those at high risk of CKD progression (eg, estimated GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria ≥300 mg per 24 hours, or rapid decline in estimated GFR) should be promptly referred to a nephrologist. Conclusions and Relevance: Diagnosis, staging, and appropriate referral of CKD by primary care clinicians are important in reducing the burden of CKD worldwide.


Subject(s)
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Diabetes Complications/drug therapy , Disease Progression , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Prognosis , Referral and Consultation , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Risk Assessment
6.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 20(6): e12975, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30107075

ABSTRACT

Disseminated strongyloidiasis is a potentially life-threatening infection in organ transplant recipients that typically occurs within the first 6 months of transplantation. We discuss a patient from the Appalachia region of Virginia who appeared to acquire Strongyloides stercoralis domestically years after kidney transplantation and then develop disseminated strongyloidiasis.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Strongyloides stercoralis/isolation & purification , Strongyloidiasis/diagnosis , Superinfection/diagnosis , Aged , Animals , Antiparasitic Agents/therapeutic use , Feces/parasitology , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Strongyloidiasis/drug therapy , Strongyloidiasis/immunology , Strongyloidiasis/parasitology , Superinfection/drug therapy , Superinfection/immunology , Superinfection/parasitology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...