Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Intern Med J ; 52(9): 1505-1512, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In developing an effective framework for a collaborative research network (RN) that supports members involved in research, the Internal Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand (IMSANZ) required a better understanding of the current level of research activity and engagement by general physicians, and factors influencing such engagement. AIMS: To explore the current research landscape amongst general physicians in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: A questionnaire exploring research participation, scope, research enablers and barriers was disseminated to IMSANZ members over a 3-month period. Core functions of IMSANZ-RN, research priorities, potential solutions to perceived barriers and required level of support were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 82 members, mostly senior medical staff (74.4%), responded to the survey (11.8% response rate). More than 70% were involved in impactful research across multiple disciplines, encompassing a wide range of research themes and topics. However, there is limited support and resources available to conduct research, with most projects being self-instigated and self-funded. There is overwhelming support to increasing the profile of research in general medicine through the establishment of IMSANZ-RN, whose principal purposes, as identified by respondents, are to foster collaboration, promote research, provide research education and training, and share information among general physicians. Quality improvement studies (56.1%) and clinical trials (41.5%) were also identified as priority research types. CONCLUSIONS: This study has profiled the constraints faced by general physicians in conducting high-quality collaborative research and provides insights into what is needed to support greater research engagement, through development of a discipline-specific clinical RN.


Subject(s)
Surveys and Questionnaires , Australia , Humans , New Zealand
2.
BMC Med Ethics ; 23(1): 73, 2022 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35836232

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Junior medical doctors have a key role in discussions and decisions about treatment and end-of-life care for people with dementia in hospital. Little is known about junior doctors' decision-making processes when treating people with dementia who have advance care directives (ACDs), or the factors that influence their decisions. To describe among junior doctors in relation to two hypothetical vignettes involving patients with dementia: (1) their legal compliance and decision-making process related to treatment decisions; (2) the factors influencing their clinical decision-making; and (3) the factors associated with accurate responses to one hypothetical vignette. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey of junior doctors, including trainees, interns, registrars and residents, on clinical rotation in five public hospitals located in one Australian state. The anonymous, investigator-developed survey was conducted between August 2018 and June 2019. Two hypothetical vignettes describing patients with dementia presenting to hospital with an ACD and either: (1) bacterial pneumonia; or (2) suspected stroke were presented in the survey. Participants were asked to indicate whether they would commence treatment, given the ACD instructions described in each vignette. RESULTS: Overall, 116 junior doctors responded (35% consent rate). In Vignette 1, 58% of respondents (n = 67/116) selected the legally compliant option (i.e. not commence treatment). Participants who chose the legally compliant option perceived 'following patient wishes' (n = 32/67; 48%) and 'legal requirements to follow ACDs' (n = 32/67; 48%) as equally important reasons for complying with the ACD. The most common reason for not selecting the legally compliant option in Vignette 1 was the 'ACD is relevant in my decision-making process, but other factors are more relevant' (n = 14/37; 38%). In Vignette 2, 72% of respondents (n = 83/116) indicated they would commence treatment (i.e. not follow the ACD) and 18% (n = 21/116) selected they would not commence treatment. (i.e. follow the ACD). Similar reasons influenced participant decision-making in Vignette 2, a less legally certain scenario. CONCLUSIONS: There are critical gaps in junior doctors' compliance with the law as it relates to the implementation of ACDs. Despite there being differences in relation to the legal answer and its certainty, clinical and ethical factors guided decision-making over and above the law in both vignettes. More education and training to guide junior doctors' clinical decision-making and ensure compliance with the law is required.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Physicians , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Dementia/therapy , Humans
3.
BMC Med Ethics ; 23(1): 74, 2022 07 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35850728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For the benefits of advance care planning to be realised during a hospital admission, the treating team must have accurate knowledge of the law pertaining to implementation of advance care directives (ACDs) and substitute decision making. AIMS: To determine in a sample of Junior Medical Officers (JMOs): (1) knowledge of the correct order to approach people as substitute decision makers if a patient does not have capacity to consent to treatment; (2) knowledge of the legal validity of ACDs when making healthcare decisions for persons without capacity to consent to treatment, including the characteristics associated with higher knowledge; and (3) barriers to enacting ACDs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at five public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Interns, residents, registrars, and trainees on clinical rotation during the recruitment period were eligible to participate. Consenting participants completed an anonymous pen-and-paper survey. RESULTS: A total of 118 JMOs completed a survey (36% return rate). Fifty-five percent of participants were female and 56.8% were aged 20-29 years. Seventy-five percent of JMOs correctly identified a Guardian as the first person to approach if a patient did not have decision-making capacity, and 74% correctly identified a person's spouse or partner as the next person to approach. Only 16.5% identified all four persons in the correct order, and 13.5% did not identify any in the correct order. The mean number of correct responses to the questions assessing knowledge of the legal validity of ACDs was 2.6 (SD = 1.1) out of a possible score of 6. Only 28 participants (23.7%) correctly answered four or more knowledge statements correctly. None of the explored variables were significantly associated with higher knowledge of the legal validity of ACDs. Uncertainty about the currency of ACDs and uncertainty about the legal implications of relying on an ACD when a patient's family or substitute decision maker disagree with it were the main barriers to enacting ACDs. CONCLUSION: JMOs knowledge of the legal validity of ACDs for persons without decision making capacity and the substitute decision making hierarchy is limited. There is a clear need for targeted education and training to improve knowledge in this area for this cohort.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Advance Directives , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male
4.
Intern Med J ; 51(12): 2055-2060, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A resuscitation plan is a medically authorised order to use or withhold resuscitation interventions. Absence of appropriate resuscitation orders exposes patients to the risk of invasive medical interventions that may be of questionable benefit depending on individual circumstances. AIMS: To describe among junior doctors: (i) self-reported confidence discussing and completing resuscitation plans; (ii) knowledge of resuscitation policy including whether resuscitation plans are legally enforceable and key triggers for completion; and (iii) the factors associated with higher knowledge of triggers for completing resuscitation plans. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at five hospitals. Junior doctors on clinical rotation were approached at scheduled training sessions, before or after ward rounds or at change of rotation orientation days and provided with a pen-and-paper survey. RESULTS: A total of 118 junior doctors participated. Most felt confident discussing (79%; n = 92) and documenting (87%; n = 102) resuscitation plans with patients. However, only 45% (n = 52) of doctors correctly identified that resuscitation plans are legally enforceable medical orders. On average, doctors correctly identified 6.8 (standard deviation = 1.8) out of 10 triggers for completing a resuscitation plan. Doctors aged >30 years were four times more likely to have high knowledge of triggers for completing resuscitation plans (odds ratio 4.28 (95% confidence interval 1.54-11.89); P = 0.0053). CONCLUSION: Most junior doctors feel confident discussing and documenting resuscitation plans. There is a need to improve knowledge about legal obligations to follow completed resuscitation plans, and about when resuscitation plans should be completed to ensure they are completed with patients who are most at risk.


Subject(s)
Medical Staff, Hospital , Physicians , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Resuscitation Orders , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Aust Prescr ; 43(1): 7-11, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139956

ABSTRACT

Approximately 20% of patients with obstructive lung disease have features of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease These patients have a higher burden of disease and increased exacerbations compared to those with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease alone Management should address dominant clinical features in each individual patient, and comorbidities should be considered There are several interventions that are useful in the management of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease As inhaled corticosteroids are key to the management of asthma, they are recommended in patients with overlapping chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

6.
Aust J Rural Health ; 22(6): 328-33, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To rationalise oxygen procedures in adult medical and surgical inpatients with a view to improving patient safety. DESIGN: Prospective pre- and post-intervention audit. SETTING: Manning Hospital, a rural referral hospital in Taree NSW. PARTICIPANTS: Pre-intervention: 82 patients aged 72.7 ± 14.7 years. Post-intervention: 77 patients aged 73.6 ± 12.4 years. INTERVENTION: A multicomponent intervention composed of implementation of a local hospital oxygen policy, introduction of a specific oxygen prescription chart and targeted staff education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfactory oxygen prescription, monitoring and titration. RESULTS: Only 2/82 (2.4%) patients had satisfactory oxygen prescription specifying target saturation, device and initial flow rate before the intervention compared with 26/77 (34%) patients post-intervention (χ(2) = 56.88, df = 5, P < 0.0001). Percentage of patients with conditions predisposing to hypercapnic respiratory failure who were overtreated with oxygen dropped from 9/19 (47%) to 4/22 (18%) following the study intervention (χ(2) = 4.011, df = 1, P = 0.04). Oxygen therapy monitoring was satisfactory during the audit period, but oxygen titration was unsatisfactory and did not significantly improve following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A multicomponent intervention can achieve a significantly increased rate of satisfactory oxygen prescriptions specifying target saturation, including in those who are at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Rural , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Patient Safety , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , New South Wales , Organizational Policy , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/standards , Prescriptions/standards , Quality Improvement
8.
J Phys Chem B ; 115(49): 14784-8, 2011 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22029390

ABSTRACT

This study examines the properties of a 4 × 2 matrix of aqueous cations and anions at concentrations up to 8.0 M. The apparent molar water volume, as calculated by subtracting the mass and volume of the ions from the corresponding solution density, was found to exceed the molar volume of ice in many concentrated electrolyte solutions, underscoring the nonideal behavior of these systems. The solvent properties of water were also analyzed by measuring the solubility of diketopiperazine (DKP) in 2.000 M salt solutions prepared from the same ion combinations. Solution rankings for DKP solubility were found to parallel the Hofmeister series for both cations and anions, whereas molar water volume concurred with the cation series only. The results are discussed within the framework of a desolvation energy model that attributes solute-specific changes in equilibria to solute-dependent changes in the free energy of bulk water.


Subject(s)
Diketopiperazines/chemistry , Water/chemistry , Anions/chemistry , Cations/chemistry , Solubility , Thermodynamics
9.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(4): 352-60, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20130401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stroke patients are more likely to make a good recovery if they receive care in a well-organised stroke unit. However, there are uncertainties about how best to provide such care. We studied 2 key aspects of early stroke unit care: early active mobilisation (EM) and automated monitoring (AM) for physiological complications such as hypoxia. METHODS: This was an observer-blinded, factorial (2 x 2) pilot randomised controlled trial recruiting stroke patients within 36 h of symptom onset. The patients were randomised to 1 of 4 nurse-led treatment protocols: (a) standard stroke unit care, (b) EM, (c) AM or (d) combined EM and AM. The primary outcome was the Rankin score at 3 months. We also report the data on feasibility and safety. RESULTS: We randomised 32 patients (mean age = 65 years; mean baseline modified NIH score = 6). On unadjusted comparisons, the EM patients were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to mobilise very early (within 1 h of randomisation) and to achieve walking by day 5 and were less likely to develop complications of immobility. The AM group was significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to have pre-defined physiological complication events detected. All these associations remained, but were less statistically significant, after correcting for age, baseline NIH score and co-interventions. There were no significant safety concerns. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing EM and AM for physiological complications in a randomised controlled trial. Larger trials are warranted to determine whether these interventions have clinical benefits.


Subject(s)
Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Stroke Rehabilitation , Telemetry , Aged , Automation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hospital Units , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Pilot Projects , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Stroke/nursing , Time Factors , Walking
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...