Protocolized use of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) for the reversal of warfarin induced coagulopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Coagulopathy due to warfarin in patients with major bleeding was traditionally reversed with fresh frozen plasma and intravenous (IV) vitamin K, but prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) are increasingly used in the treatment of these patients. Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) is an activated four-factor PCC most commonly used in patients with hemophilia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FEIBA and IV vitamin K for the reversal of warfarin-associated coagulopathy in patients with major bleeding, by measuring the percentage of patients who achieved target INR ≤ 1.5 and the incidence of thrombotic adverse events (TAE). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with warfarin associated coagulopathy (INR > 1.5) and major bleeding. Patients received FEIBA using an INR based dosing strategy and IV vitamin K. RESULTS: In 43 patients, median initial INR was 4.0 (2.7, 7.3 interquartile range (IQR)). Median time to result the second INR was 45 min (38, 55 IQR) and the median INR was 1.4 (1.3, 1.6 IQR). Out of the 43 patients, 93% achieved the target INR of ≤1.5. In-hospital mortality was 40% (17 patients). There were 11 TAEs in 6 patients (14%); 4 events in 2 patients (5%) were attributed to FEIBA. CONCLUSION: A protocolized use of FEIBA and IV vitamin K resulted in the efficacious reversal of warfarin-induced coagulopathy in patients with major bleeding. TAEs occurred in 14% of patients and were attributed to FEIBA in 5% of patients.

Germline BRCA mutation evaluation in a prospective triple-negative breast cancer registry: implications for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome testing.

NCCN guidelines recommend genetic testing for all triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients aged ≤60 years. However, due to the lack of prospective information in unselected patients, these guidelines are not uniformly adopted by clinicians and insurance carriers. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of BRCA mutations and evaluate the utility of NCCN guidelines in unselected TNBC population. Stage I-IV TNBC patients were enrolled on a prospective registry at academic and community practices. All patients underwent BRCA1/2 testing. Significant family history (SFH) was defined >1 relative with breast cancer at age ≤50 or ≥1 relative with ovarian cancer. Mutation prevalence in the entire cohort and subgroups was calculated. 207 TNBC patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. Racial/ethnic distribution: Caucasian (80 %), African-American (14 %), Ashkenazi (1 %). Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations were identified in 15.4 % (32/207) of patients (BRCA1:11.1 %, BRCA2:4.3 %). SFH reported by 36 % of patients. Mutation prevalence in patients with and without SFH was 31.6 and 6.1 %, respectively. When assessed by age at TNBC diagnosis, the mutation prevalences were 27.6 % (≤50 years), 11.4 % (51-60 years), and 4.9 % (≥61 years). Using SFH or age ≤50 as criteria, 25 and 34 % of mutations, respectively, were missed. Mutation prevalence in patients meeting NCCN guidelines was 18.3 % (32/175) and 0 % (0/32) in patients who did not meet guidelines (p = .0059). In this unselected academic and community population with negligible Ashkenazi representation, we observed an overall BRCA mutation prevalence rate of 15.4 %. BRCA testing based on NCCN guidelines identified all carriers supporting its routine application in clinical practice for TNBC.