Cisapride disposition in neonates and infants: in vivo reflection of cytochrome P450 3A4 ontogeny.

BACKGROUND: Cisapride, a prokinetic agent and substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, has been used to treat neonates and infants with feeding intolerance and apnea or bradycardia associated with gastroesophageal reflux. At age 1 month, CYP3A4 activity has been reported to be only 30% to 40% of adult activity. This known developmental delay in the expression of CYP3A4 prompted us to conduct a classical open-label pharmacokinetic study of cisapride in neonates and young infants. METHODS: A total of 35 infants with a postconceptional age of 28 to 54 weeks at the time of the study received a single oral cisapride dose (0.2 mg/kg) at a postnatal age of 4 to 102 days, followed by repeated (n = 7) blood sampling over a 24-hour period. Cisapride and norcisapride were quantitated from plasma by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic data determined (n = 32) by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) were as follows: time to reach peak plasma concentration (t(max)), 4.4 +/- 2.8 hours (range, 0.9-12 hours); peak plasma concentration (C(max)), 29.3 +/- 16.6 ng/mL (range, 5.2-71.7 ng/mL); elimination half-life (t(1/2)), 10.7 +/- 3.7 hours (range, 1.9-18.1 hours); apparent total body clearance (Cl/F), 0.62 +/- 0.43 L. h(-1). kg(-1) (range, 0.2-1.9 L. h(-1). kg(-1)); and apparent volume of distribution (VD(ss)/F), 9.0 +/- 7.1 L/kg (range, 2.2-30.5 L/kg). The apparent renal clearance (CL(R)) of cisapride in infants (n = 28) was estimated to be 0.003 +/- 0.003 L. h(-1). kg(-1). Substratification of the population based on postconceptional age demonstrated the following findings for cisapride: (1) The mean (+/-SD) C(max) for cisapride was higher in the oldest postconceptional age category (44.5 +/- 19.6 ng/mL) than the middle and youngest categories (23.4 +/- 11.7 ng/mL and 30.0 +/- 17.5 ng/mL, respectively); (2) the t(max) for cisapride was shortest in the oldest postconceptional age category (2.2 +/- 1.1 hours) compared with the middle and youngest categories (4.4 +/- 3.3 hours and 5.0 +/- 2.6 hours, respectively); (3) the CL/F for cisapride in the youngest postconceptional age group was significantly lower (0.45 +/- 0.26 L. h(-1). kg(-1), P <.05) than in the middle and oldest categories (0.75 +/- 0.46 L. h(-1). kg(-1) and 0.85 +/- 0.69 L. h(-1). kg(-1), respectively); (4) a positive linear correlation was found between postconceptional age and the apparent terminal elimination rate constant (lambda(z)) for cisapride (P <.001, r(2) = 0.47) but not with CL/F. For norcisapride, the mean apparent C(max) was highest and the t(max) was shortest in the oldest postconceptional age group, although no association between postconceptional age and the norcisapride/cisapride area under the curve ratio was observed. All infants tolerated a single dose of cisapride well without significant alteration in QTc. CONCLUSIONS: (1) In neonates and infants, cisapride absorption and metabolism to its primary metabolite, norcisapride, were developmentally dependent; (2) approximately 99% of cisapride CL/F in neonates and young infants was nonrenal in nature; (3) CL/F of cisapride in neonates and infants noted in this study was reduced compared with data from older children and adults, likely as a result of developmental reductions in CYP3A4 activity; (4) as reflected by the correlation between postconceptional age and lambda(z), a rapid increase in total CYP3A4 activity occurs in the first 3 months of life.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing Surfaxin (Lucinactant) lavage with standard care for treatment of meconium aspiration syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Infants with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) have marked surfactant dysfunction. Airways and alveoli of affected neonates contain meconium, inflammatory cells, inflammatory mediators, edema fluid, protein, and other debris. The objective of this study was to compare treatment with bronchoalveolar lavage using dilute Surfaxin with standard therapy in a population of newborn infants with MAS. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were 1) gestational age > or =35 weeks, 2) enrollment within 72 hours of birth, 3) diagnosis of MAS, 4) need for mechanical ventilation, and 5) an oxygenation index > or =8 and < or =25. Subjects were randomized to either lavage with Surfaxin or standard care (2:1 proportion). In lavaged infants, a volume of 8 mL/kg dilute Surfaxin (2.5 mg/mL) was instilled into each lung over approximately 20 seconds followed by suctioning after 5 ventilator breaths. The procedure was repeated twice. The third and final lavage was with a more concentrated solution (10 mg/mL) of Surfaxin. RESULTS: Twenty-two infants were enrolled (15 Surfaxin and 7 control). Demographic characteristics were similar. There were trends (not significant) for Surfaxin-lavaged infants to be weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier (mean of 6.3 vs 9.9 days, respectively), as well as to have a more rapid decline in their oxygenation indexes compared with control infants, the latter difference persisting for the 96-hour-long study period. The therapy was safe and generally well tolerated by the infants. CONCLUSIONS: Dilute Surfaxin lavage seems to be a safe and potentially effective therapy in the treatment of MAS. Data from this investigation support future prospective, controlled clinical trials of bronchoalveolar lavage with Surfaxin in neonates with MAS.