The narial musculature of Alligator mississippiensis: Can a muscle be its own antagonist?

The crocodilian naris is regulated by smooth muscle. The morphology of this system was investigated using a combination of gross, light microscopic, and micro-CT analyses, while the mechanics of narial regulation were examined using a combination of Hall Effect sensors, narial manometry, and electromyography. Alligator mississippiensis, like other crocodilians, routinely switches among multiple ventilatory mechanics and does not occlude the nares during any portion of the ventilatory cycle. In a complex that is unique among vertebrates, a single block of smooth muscle functions in dilation when active, and in constriction when passive. The alligator nares may include one of the best examples of a muscle that functions in "pushing" as well as "pulling." The central muscle for narial regulation, the dilator naris, can legitimately be viewed as its own antagonist.

Intracranial pressure in the American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis): reptilian meninges and orthostatic gradients.

The cranial meninges of reptiles differ from the more widely studied mammalian pattern in that the intraventricular and subarachnoid spaces are, at least partially, isolated. This study was undertaken to investigate the bulk flow of cerebrospinal fluid, and the resulting changes in intracranial pressure, in a common reptilian species. Intracranial pressure was measured using ocular ultrasonography and by surgically implanting pressure cannulae into the cranial subarachnoid space. The system was then challenged by: rotating the animal to create orthostatic gradients, perturbation of the vascular system, administration of epinephrine, and cephalic cutaneous heating. Pressure changes determined from the implanted catheters and through quantification of the optic nerve sheath were highly correlated and showed a significant linear relationship with orthostatic gradients. The catheter pressure responses were phasic, with an initial rapid response followed by a much slower response; each phase accounted for roughly half of the total pressure change. No significant relationship was found between intracranial pressure and either heart rate or blood flow. The focal application of heat and the administration of epinephrine both increased intracranial pressure, the latter influence being particularly pronounced.