Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 22(5): 1181-1188, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21041376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is high, and patients are likely to require hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and transfusions. The relationships between these events and the MDS complications of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia are not well understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1864 patients registered in the United States' Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and aged ≥ 66 years old when diagnosed with MDS in 2001 or 2002 were included. Medicare claims were used to identify MDS complications and utilization (hospitalizations, ED visits, and transfusions) until death or the end of 2005. Mortality was based on SEER data. Kaplan-Meier incidence rates were estimated and multivariable Cox models were used to study the association between complications and outcomes. RESULTS: The 3-year incidence of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was 81%, 25%, and 41%, and the incidence of hospitalization, ED visit, and transfusion was 62%, 42%, and 45%, respectively. Median survival time was 22 months. Cytopenia complications were significantly associated with each of these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: All types of cytopenia are common among patients with MDS and are risk factors for high rates of health care utilization and mortality. Management of the complications of MDS may improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/epidemiology , Anemia/etiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/complications , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Neutropenia/etiology , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology , Thrombocytopenia/etiology
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 54(5): 563-71, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11677471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative colon surveillance has been recommended for patients with a diagnosis of local/regional colorectal cancer. The extent to which these recommendations are followed in practice is poorly characterized. Patterns of surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer were determined by using a large population-based database. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with cancer registry data linked to Medicare claims. Identified were 52,283 patients treated for local/regional colorectal cancer between 1986 and 1996, and surveillance patterns through 1998 were determined. Surveillance patterns were analyzed by using survival analysis and by computing the proportion of surviving patients who underwent procedures during 4 time periods after treatment: 2 to 14 months, 15 to 50 months, 51 to 86 months and more than 87 months. RESULTS: Median times to first through fifth surveillance events were 20, 14, 15, 15, and 15 months, respectively. For 17% of the cohort there was no surveillance event. Younger patients were more likely to undergo surveillance. Surveillance patterns were not affected by stage. The proportions of the cohort that underwent no surveillance during the 4 respective time periods were 54%, 52%, 60%, and 69%. The percentages of patients who underwent surveillance annually or more frequently in the latter 3 time periods, respectively, were 19%, 10%, and 5%, or 11% overall, treating the data for the 3 events as a whole. Over the period from 1986 to 1998, the proportion of patients who had no surveillance procedures gradually decreased, whereas the proportion of those who underwent procedures annually or more frequently remained relatively constant. CONCLUSIONS: During the period from 1986 to 1998 there was low utilization of postdiagnosis colon surveillance in a substantial proportion of elderly patients with a diagnosis of local/regional colorectal cancer. Over time there was a trend toward increasing receipt of any surveillance procedures. The percentages of patients undergoing surveillance annually or more frequently did not change between earlier and later periods.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Continuity of Patient Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Male , Medicare , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
3.
Pharmacol Rev ; 53(1): 73-91, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11171939

ABSTRACT

Prostate-specific antigen is a serine protease that is a member of the kallikrein family. It is widely used as an indicator of tumor burden and as a surrogate marker for disease progression in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer. It has been shown that the expression and/or secretion of this glycoprotein can be regulated by pharmacological agents. The effects of these agents on PSA may be independent of their effects on cell growth. For example, a pharmacological agent may down-regulate PSA expression/secretion but have no effect on tumor cell growth. In this case, a patient receiving this therapeutic agent might be falsely considered as having a clinical response. Alternatively, an agent might up-regulate PSA expression/secretion and have an inhibitory effect on cell growth. A patient receiving this therapeutic agent might be diagnosed with progressive disease unless an alternative method for assessing tumor burden is used. Thus, when an agent is to be evaluated in a clinical trial utilizing PSA as a marker for disease progression, it is important to prospectively test whether the agent has an effect on PSA expression and/or secretion. In addition, it is equally important to understand how these regulatory effects relate to cell growth. The purpose of this review is to describe several agents that have been tested for their regulatory effects on PSA and to discuss potential mechanisms of by which this regulation may occur. The implications of these findings in the evaluation of new agents in androgen-independent prostate cancer will be considered.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/biosynthesis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/genetics , Animals , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Male , Receptors, Androgen/drug effects , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Up-Regulation/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...