The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether statins reduce all cause mortality and major coronary and cerebrovascular events in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, and whether these effects are similar in men and women, in young and older (>65 years) people, and in people with diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, and Medline. Data abstraction Two independent investigators identified studies on the clinical effects of statins compared with a placebo or control group and with follow-up of at least one year, at least 80% or more participants without established cardiovascular disease, and outcome data on mortality and major cardiovascular disease events. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and I(2) statistics. Publication bias was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and the Egger regression test. RESULTS: 10 trials enrolled a total of 70 388 people, of whom 23 681 (34%) were women and 16 078 (23%) had diabetes mellitus. Mean follow-up was 4.1 years. Treatment with statins significantly reduced the risk of all cause mortality (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.96), major coronary events (0.70, 0.61 to 0.81), and major cerebrovascular events (0.81, 0.71 to 0.93). No evidence of an increased risk of cancer was observed. There was no significant heterogeneity of the treatment effect in clinical subgroups. CONCLUSION: In patients without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, statin use was associated with significantly improved survival and large reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events.

Plasma pancreatic polypeptide levels are associated with differences in body fat distribution in human subjects.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) is produced by the F-cells of the pancreas, and its plasma concentration has been used as a marker of parasympathetic activity. Recent work in rodents suggests that there is both sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of white adipose tissue and that parasympathetic activity is anabolic resulting in lipid accumulation. We have examined whether in humans increased PP levels are associated with increased intra-abdominal fat (IAF), and thereby insulin resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured PP levels in 177 non-diabetic subjects (75 male/102 female; age 32-75 years) 3 min after an i.v. glucose bolus during a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. IAF and s.c. fat (SCF) areas were measured by CT scan. The insulin sensitivity index (S (I)) was quantified using Bergman's minimal model. RESULTS: PP levels were higher in men than in women (96.2 +/- 72.2 vs 76.1 +/- 55.0 pg/ml, mean +/- SD, p = 0.037), as was IAF area (124.7 +/- 67.4 vs 83.0 +/- 57.7 cm(2), p < 0.001). While PP levels were significantly associated with IAF (r = 0.16, p = 0.031), WHR (r = 0.30, p < 0.001) and age (r = 0.37, p < 0.01), they were not associated with SCF (r = 0.02, p = 0.829). The association between PP and IAF was not independent of age and/or sex. S(I) was negatively associated with PP levels (r = -0.17, p = 0.026) and IAF area (r = -0.65, p < 0.001). The association between S(I) and PP disappeared after adjusting for IAF area, indicating that S(I) was not a major determinant of PP levels. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In humans, age and sex may modulate the association between plasma PP level and IAF area, suggesting that they may be determinants of parasympathetic activity and thus IAF accumulation.

Resistin is not associated with insulin sensitivity or the metabolic syndrome in humans.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to further elucidate the relationship between resistin and insulin sensitivity, body fat distribution and the metabolic syndrome in humans. METHODS: We measured plasma resistin levels in 177 non-diabetic subjects (75 male, 102 female; age 32-75 years). BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids, glucose, plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), adiponectin and leptin levels were also measured. The insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) was quantified using Bergman's minimal model. Intra-abdominal fat (IAF) and subcutaneous fat (SQF) areas were quantified by CT scan. Presence of metabolic syndrome criteria was determined using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. RESULTS: When subjects were divided into categories based on BMI (< or > or =27.5 kg/m(2)) and S(I) (< or > or = 7 x 10(-5) min(-1) [pmol/l](-1)), resistin levels did not differ between the lean, insulin-sensitive (n=53, 5.36+/-0.3 ng/ml), lean, insulin-resistant (n=67, 5.70+/-0.4 ng/ml) and obese, insulin-resistant groups (n=48, 5.94+/-0.4 ng/ml; ANOVA p=0.65). Resistin correlated with age (r=-0.22, p<0.01), BMI (r=0.16, p=0.03) and SQF (r=0.19, p=0.01) but not with S(I) (p=0.31) or IAF (p=0.52). Resistin did not correlate with the number of metabolic syndrome criteria or any of the individual metabolic syndrome criteria. In contrast, adiponectin, PAI-1 and leptin each correlated with IAF, SQF and S(I). Additionally, the number of metabolic syndrome criteria correlated with adiponectin (r=-0.32, p<0.001), leptin (r=0.31, p<0.001) and PAI-1 (r=0.26, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In contrast to other adipokines, resistin is only weakly associated with body fat and is unlikely to be a major mediator of insulin resistance or the metabolic syndrome in humans.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ezetimibe in primary hypercholesterolaemia: a pooled analysis from two controlled phase III clinical studies.

Ezetimibe is a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor that blocks intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. Data from 1719 patients who participated in two multicentre, double-blind studies of ezetimibe were pooled to evaluate the drug's efficacy and safety in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Following dietary stabilisation, a two- to 12-week washout period, and a four-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, patients were randomised to ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo once daily in the morning for 12 consecutive weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent reduction in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol from baseline at endpoint. Ezetimibe reduced LDL-cholesterol by a mean of 18.2% compared with an increase of 0.9% with placebo (p<0.01) and resulted in favourable, statistically significant changes in HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and apo B. The response to ezetimibe was consistent across all subgroups analysed. Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to placebo.

Relationship of adiponectin to body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and plasma lipoproteins: evidence for independent roles of age and sex.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Increased intra-abdominal fat is associated with insulin resistance and an atherogenic lipoprotein profile. Circulating concentrations of adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived protein, are decreased with insulin resistance. We investigated the relationships between adiponectin and leptin, body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and lipoproteins. METHODS: We measured plasma adiponectin, leptin and lipid concentrations, intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat areas by CT scan, and insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) in 182 subjects (76 M/106F). RESULTS: Adiponectin concentrations were higher in women than in men (7.4+/-2.9 vs 5.4+/-2.3 micro g/ml, p<0.0001) as were leptin concentrations (19.1+/-13.7 vs 6.9+/-5.1 ng/ml, p<0.0001). Women were more insulin sensitive (S(I): 6.8+/-3.9 vs 5.9+/-4.4 x 10(-5) min(-1)/(pmol/l), p<0.01) and had more subcutaneous (240+/-133 vs 187+/-90 cm(2), p<0.01), but less intra-abdominal fat (82+/-57 vs 124+/-68 cm(2), p<0.0001). By simple regression, adiponectin was positively correlated with age ( r=0.227, p<0.01) and S(I) ( r=0.375, p<0.0001), and negatively correlated with BMI ( r=-0.333, p<0.0001), subcutaneous ( r=-0.168, p<0.05) and intra-abdominal fat ( r=-0.35, p<0.0001). Adiponectin was negatively correlated with triglycerides ( r=-0.281, p<0.001) and positively correlated with HDL cholesterol ( r=0.605, p<0.0001) and Rf, a measure of LDL particle buoyancy ( r=0.474, p<0.0001). By multiple regression analysis, adiponectin was related to age ( p<0.0001), sex ( p<0.005) and intra-abdominal fat ( p<0.01). S(I) was related to intra-abdominal fat ( p<0.0001) and adiponectin ( p<0.0005). Both intra-abdominal fat and adiponectin contributed independently to triglycerides, HDL cholesterol and Rf. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: These data suggest that adiponectin concentrations are determined by intra-abdominal fat mass, with additional independent effects of age and sex. Adiponectin could link intra-abdominal fat with insulin resistance and an atherogenic lipoprotein profile.

Effects of ezetimibe, a new cholesterol absorption inhibitor, on plasma lipids in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

AIMS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ezetimibe 10 mg/day in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Following dietary stabilization, a 2-12-week washout period, and a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 827 patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =3.36 mmol/l (130 mg/dl) to < or =6.47 mmol/l (250 mg/dl) and triglycerides < or =3.95 mmol/l (350 mg/dl) were randomized 3:1 to receive ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo orally once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage reduction in direct plasma LDL-C. Ezetimibe reduced direct LDL-C by a mean of 17.7% from baseline to endpoint, compared with an increase of 0.8% with placebo (P<0.01). Response to ezetimibe was generally consistent across all subgroups analyzed. Ezetimibe also significantly improved levels of plasma total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, high-density lipoprotein(2)-cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), and elicited a trend toward lower triglyceride levels. Ezetimibe did not alter the serum concentrations of lipid-soluble vitamins or significantly affect baseline or stimulated cortisol production. Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe, which significantly reduces LDL-C and favorably affects other lipid variables, may provide a well tolerated and effective new option for lipid management in the future.

Association of plasma phospholipid transfer protein activity with IDL and buoyant LDL: impact of gender and adiposity.

Current data suggest that phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) has multiple metabolic functions, however, its physiological significance in humans remains to be clarified. To provide further insight into the role of PLTP in lipoprotein metabolism, plasma PLTP activity was measured, and lipoproteins were analyzed in 134 non-diabetic individuals on a controlled diet. Insulin sensitivity index (Si) and body fat composition were also determined. Plasma PLTP activity was comparable between men (n=56) and women (n=78). However, in women but not in men, plasma PLTP activity was positively correlated with cholesterol, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B (r=0.38-0.45, P< or =0.001), and with body mass index (BMI), subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat (SCF, IAF) (r=0.27-0.29, P<0.02). Among the different apo B-containing lipoproteins (LpB) in women, PLTP was most highly correlated with intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL) and buoyant LDL (r=0.45-0.46, P<0.001). The correlation with IDL was significant only in women with BMI < or =27.5 kg/m(2) (n=56). In men with BMI < or =27.5 kg/m(2) (n=35), PLTP activity was significantly correlated with buoyant LDL (r=0.40, P<0.02) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) (r=0.43, P<0.01). These data provide evidence for a role of PLTP in LpB metabolism, particularly IDL and buoyant LDL. They also suggest that gender and obesity-related factors can modulate the impact of PLTP on LpB.

Effectiveness and tolerability of ezetimibe in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: pooled analysis of two phase II studies.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe (SCH 58235) is a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor that selectively and potently blocks intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. OBJECTIVE: Data from 2 multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, 12-week studies of ezetimibe were pooled to evaluate the drug's effect on lipid parameters in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: After dietary stabilization (National Cholesterol Education Program Step I diet or a stricter diet), washout of lipid-altering drugs, and a 6-week placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 and < or = 250 mg/dL and plasma triglyceride (TG) levels < or = 300 mg/dL were randomized to receive either ezetimibe 0.25, 1, 5, or 10 mg, or placebo administered once daily before the morning meal in study A (dose-response study) or ezetimibe 5 or 10 mg or placebo administered once daily before the morning meal or at bedtime in study B (dose-regimen study). RESULTS: A total of 432 patients were included in this pooled analysis, 243 in study A and 189 in study B. The 5- and 10-mg doses of ezetimibe significantly reduced LDL-C levels by 15.7% and 18.5%, respectively (P < 0.01 vs placebo) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hDL-C) levels by 2.9% and 3.5%, respectively (P < 0.05 vs placebo). A reduction in plasma TG levels was observed (P = NS). With the 10-mg dose of ezetimibe, 67.8% of patients achieved > or = 15% reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and 22.0% achieved > or = 25% reduction. With the 5-mg dose, 54.0% of patients achieved > or = 15% reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and 15.3% achieved > or = 25% reduction. The decrease in plasma LDL-C levels was significantly greater with ezetimibe 10 mg compared with ezetimibe 5 mg (P < 0.05). Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In these two 12-week studies, ezetimibe significantly decreased plasma LDL-C levels and increased plasma HDL-C levels, with a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo.

Declining insulin requirement in the late first trimester of diabetic pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes are associated with a decrease in first-trimester insulin requirement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the weekly insulin requirement (as units per kilogram per day) during the first trimester of pregnancy in diabetic women in the Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study (DIEP) with accurate gestational dating, regular glucose monitoring, daily insulin-dose recording, and monthly glycohemoglobin measurements. RESULTS: In pregnancies that resulted in live-born full-term singleton infants, a significant 18% increase in mean weekly dosage was observed between weeks 3 and 7 (P = 0.000), followed by a significant 9% decline from week 7 through week 15 (P = 0.000). Further testing localized a significant change in insulin dose in the interval beginning weeks 7-8 and ending weeks 11-12 (P = 0.014). Within this interval, the maximum decrease was between weeks 9 and 10 (mean), 10 and 11 (median), and 8 and 9 (most frequent maximal decrease). To determine whether prior poor glucose control exaggerated these trends, we categorized the women based on their glycohemoglobin values: <2 SDs above the mean of a normal population (subgroup 1), 2-4 SDs (subgroup 2), and >4 SDs (subgroup 3) at baseline. Late first-trimester declines in dosage were statistically significant in subgroup 2 (P = 0.002) and subgroups 2 and 3 together (P = 0.003). Similarly, women with BMI >27.0 had a greater initial insulin rise and then fall compared with leaner women. CONCLUSIONS: Observations in the DIEP cohort disclose a mid-first-trimester decline in insulin requirement in type 1 diabetic pregnant women. Possible explanations include overinsulinization of previously poorly controlled diabetes, a transient decline in progesterone secretion during the late first-trimester luteo-placental shift in progesterone secretion, or other hormonal shifts. Clinicians should anticipate a clinically meaningful reduction in insulin requirement in the 5-week interval between weeks 7 and 12 of gestation.

Comparison of the lipoprotein, carbohydrate, and hemostatic effects of phasic oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel.

Desogestrel (DSG) is a less-androgenic progestogen than levonorgestrel (LNG). This difference in androgenicity may be responsible for observed differences in metabolic effects between oral contraceptive (OC) formulations containing almost equivalent estrogen doses but with either DSG or LNG as a progestogen. To test the hypothesis, a prospective 9-month randomized comparison of plasma lipids, glucose, insulin, hemostasis, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) was conducted in 66 healthy women using phasic formulations of OCs containing either DSG (DSG-OC) or LNG (LNG-OC). The study results showed that SHBG increased 3-fold with DSG-OC and 2-fold with LNG-OC. DSG-OC increased HDL-C, HDL(2)-C and HDL(3)-C; LDL-C decreased transiently. LNG-OC decreased HDL(2)-C and increased HDL(3)-C; HDL-C was unchanged and LDL-C decreased transiently. Both formulations increased VLDL-C and triglycerides, more with DSG-OC, but apolipoprotein B levels increased equally. Apo A-I and A-II increased more with DSG-OC than with LNG-OC. Neither formulation altered Lp(a) or fasting glucose and insulin levels. Postprandially, both formulations decreased glucose and increased insulin responses, but to an equivalent degree. Both OCs slightly enhanced procoagulant and profibrinolytic parameters to the same extent except for internally compensating decreases in Factor V and protein S with DSG-OC. In summary, at almost equivalent estrogen doses, a phasic OC containing DSG compared with LNG has a less androgenic effect on lipoproteins and SHBG, similar effects on hemostatic parameters with lower protein S and factor V activity and equivalent effects on carbohydrate metabolism. The lipoprotein, SHBG, and protein S and factor V differences are likely due to the lesser androgenicity of DSG allowing for a greater expression of the dose of estrogen.

Obesity, body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and Islet beta-cell function as explanations for metabolic diversity.

Studies of metabolic processes have been enhanced by our understanding of the relationships among obesity, body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and islet beta-cell function. Thus, we have learned that although insulin resistance is usually associated with obesity, even lean subjects can be insulin resistant due to the accumulation of visceral fat. Insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function are also intimately linked. The hyperbolic relationship between these two parameters explains why insulin-resistant individuals have markedly enhanced insulin responses, whereas subjects who are insulin sensitive exhibit very low responses. Failure to take into account this relationship will lead to erroneous conclusions. By accounting for this important interaction, it has been clearly demonstrated that subjects at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes (older individuals, women with a history of gestational diabetes or polycystic ovary syndrome, subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and first-degree relatives of individuals with type 2 diabetes) have impaired beta-cell function. Furthermore, the progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes is associated with declining insulin secretion.

One-year effects of increasingly fat-restricted, carbohydrate-enriched diets on lipoprotein levels in free-living subjects.

Restriction of all dietary fat is a popular strategy for restricting saturated fat intake to lower LDL cholesterol. Some authorities advise the restriction of fat intake to the extreme of less than 10% of daily energy on the assumption that more fat restriction is better. The two studies described herein address questions relating to whether increasing fat restriction produces proportionally increasing benefit on cardiovascular risk factors in hyperlipidemic subjects. The first study is the Dietary Alternatives Study (DAS). The DAS was conducted in 531 male Boeing employees over a 2-year period. Subjects were defined as hypercholesterolemic (HC) or combined hyperlipidemic (CHL) based on age-specific 75th percentiles for plasma LDL-C and triglyceride levels. Hypothesis test analyses were performed at 1 year. HC subjects were randomized to diets taught to attain fat intakes of 30, 26, 22, and 18% (Diets levels 1-4, respectively). CHL subjects (slightly fewer in number) were randomized to Diets 1-3. After 1 year, subjects' total fat intakes were 27, 26, 25, and 22% of energy (en%), resulting in saturated fat intakes of 8, 7, 7, and 6%, respectively. In HC subjects the greatest LDL-C decrease was with Diet 2 (mean of 13.4%) and in CHL subjects with Diet 1 (7.0%). Surprisingly, plasma triglyceride concentrations rose in HC subjects 20% and 40% above baseline on Diets 3 and 4, respectively, with reciprocal reductions in HDL cholesterol of 2.5% and 3%, respectively. Furthermore, apo B reductions were attenuated below Diet 2 in HC subjects and Diet 1 in CHL subjects, and no further reductions were seen in plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, blood pressure, or body weight. Measurements of plasma total fatty acid composition showed a slight increase in plasma palmitate, whereas stearate decreased slightly, supporting the idea that de novo synthesis of palmitic acid was increased in the chronic high-carbohydrate feeding condition. The second study asked if the most effective diet in HC subjects, Diet 2, has an equivalent effect in women and men. To answer this question, men and women Boeing employees were taught the closely similar National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step II diet. After 6 and 12 months, equivalent reductions in LDL cholesterol were observed in women compared with men. HDL cholesterol levels in men were unchanged from baseline at 6 and 12 months, but were reduced 8% in HC women, with accompanying decreases of 18% in HDL2-cholesterol and 5% in apoprotein A-I (all P < 0.01). These data indicate that intakes of fat below about 25 en% and carbohydrate intake above approximately 60 en% yield no further LDL-C lowering in HC and CHL male subjects and can be counterproductive to triglyceride, HDL-C, and apo B levels. This lack of benefit appears to be explained by an enhanced endogenous synthesis of palmitic acid, which negates the benefit of further saturated fat restriction. The HDL-C decrease in HC women may have a similar cause and points to an underlying male-female difference. Alternative dietary approaches to limit saturated fat intake deserve intensive study.

Differential effect of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step II diet on HDL cholesterol, its subfractions, and apoprotein A-I levels in hypercholesterolemic women and men after 1 year: the beFIT Study.

We previously reported that high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) decreases more in hypercholesterolemic (HC) women than in HC men ingesting an National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step II diet for 6 months. We examined these subjects to determine whether the differential HDL-C reduction persists after 12 months and whether it is associated with decreased HDL(2)-C and apoprotein A-I. Subjects were screened from an industrial workforce and were defined as HC if 2 low density lipoprotein cholesterol measurements were >/=75th percentile or defined as combined hyperlipidemic (CHL) if triglycerides were also >/=75th percentile. The subjects were then taught the NCEP Step II diet in 8 weekly classes and counseled quarterly. Seventy-three HC and 92 CHL women (mean ages 43 and 44 years, respectively) and 112 HC and 106 CHL men (ages 45 and 41 years, respectively) were studied. All groups reported similar total fat (24% to 26% kcal) and saturated fat (7.1% to 7.9% kcal) intakes at 1 year. HDL-C decreased 7.6% in HC women (P<0.01), exceeding the nonsignificant 1.3% decrease in HC men (P=0.000). HDL(2)-C decreased 16.7% in HC women (P<0.01) compared with the nonsignificant 0.5% increase in HC men (P=0.000). In CHL women and men, HDL-C decreased 3.5% and 3.9% (both P<0.01); HDL(2)-C decreased more in women (7.1%, P<0.01) than in men (4.3%, a nonsignificant difference). Apoprotein A-I decreased significantly (5.3%, P<0.01) in HC women only. Plasma triglycerides were unchanged. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and weight changes were not different among the 4 groups. HDL-C, HDL(2)-C, and apoprotein A-I levels decreased more in HC women than in HC men after following the NCEP Step II diet for 1 year, continuing a trend observed with HDL-C at 6 months. The total HDL-C and HDL(2)-C reductions narrow the baseline differences between men and women by 50%. Whether this reduction impacts women's protection from cardiovascular disease deserves future study. Nonetheless, the results point to sex-based differences in intrahepatic glucose and fatty acid metabolism linked to alterations in HDL formation and removal.

Extended-release niacin vs gemfibrozil for the treatment of low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Niaspan-Gemfibrozil Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a direct comparison of agents that raise plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to help devise strategies for coronary risk reduction. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we compared the effects of extended-release niacin (Niaspan), at doses increased sequentially from 1000 to 2000 mg at bedtime, with those of gemfibrozil, 600 mg given twice daily, in raising low levels of HDL-C. Enrollment criteria included an HDL-C level of 1.03 mmol/L or less (< or =40 mg/dL), a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 4.14 mmol/L or less (< or =160 mg/dL) or less than 3.36 mmol/L (<130 mg/dL) with atherosclerotic disease, and a triglyceride level of 4.52 mmol/L or less (< or =400 mg/dL). RESULTS: Among 173 patients, 72 (82%) of the 88 assigned to Niaspan treatment and 68 (80%) of the 85 assigned to gemfibrozil treatment completed the study. Niaspan, at 1500 and 2000 mg, vs gemfibrozil raised the HDL-C level more (21% and 26%, respectively, vs 13%), raised the apolipoprotein A-I level more (9% and 11% vs 4%), reduced the total cholesterol-HDL-C ratio more (-17% and -22% vs -12%), reduced the lipoprotein(a) level (-7% and -20% vs no change), and had no adverse effect on the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (2% and 0% change vs a 9% increase). Significance levels for comparisons between medications ranged from P<.001 to P<.02. Gemfibrozil reduced the triglyceride level more than Niaspan (P<.001 to P = .06, -40% for gemfibrozil vs -16% to -29% for Niaspan, 1000 to 2000 mg). Effects on plasma fibrinogen levels were significantly favorable for Niaspan compared with gemfibrozil (P<.02), as gemfibrozil increased the fibrinogen level (from 5% to 9%) and Niaspan tended to decrease the fibrinogen level (from -1% to -6%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a low baseline HDL-C level, Niaspan at its higher doses provided up to 2-fold greater HDL-C increases, decreases in lipoprotein(a), improvements in lipoprotein cholesterol ratios, and lower fibrinogen levels compared with gemfibrozil. Gemfibrozil gave a greater triglyceride reduction but also increased the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, which did not occur with Niaspan.

Estrogen and progestin, lipoprotein(a), and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events after menopause.

CONTEXT: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) events. However, few data exist on the clinical importance of Lp(a) lowering for CHD prevention. Hormone therapy with estrogen has been found to lower Lp(a) levels in women. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationships among treatment with estrogen and progestin, serum Lp(a) levels, and subsequent CHD events in postmenopausal women. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled secondary prevention trial conducted from January 1993 through July 1998 with a mean follow-up of 4.1 years at 20 centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2763 postmenopausal women younger than 80 years with coronary artery disease and an intact uterus. Mean age was 66.7 years. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg, in 1 tablet daily (n = 1380), or identical placebo (n = 1383). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lipoprotein(a) levels and CHD events (nonfatal myocardial infarction and CHD death). RESULTS: Increased baseline Lp(a) levels were associated with subsequent CHD events among women in the placebo arm. After multivariate adjustment, women in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of baseline Lp(a) level had relative hazards (RHs) (compared with the first quartile) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.59), 1.31 (95% CI, 0.85-2.04), and 1.54 (95% CI, 0.99-2.39), respectively, compared with women in the lowest quartile (P for trend = .03). Treatment with estrogen and progestin reduced mean (SD) Lp(a) levels significantly (-5.8 [15] mg/dL) (-0.20 [0.53] micromol/L) compared with placebo (0.3 [17] mg/dL) (0.01 [0.60] micromol/L) (P<.001). In a randomized subgroup comparison, women with low baseline Lp(a) levels had less benefit from estrogen and progestin than women with high Lp(a) levels; the RH for women assigned to estrogen and progestin compared with placebo were 1.49 (95% CI, 0.97-2.26) in the lowest quartile and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.67-1.65), 0.78 (0.52-1.18), and 0.85 (0.58-1.25) in the second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively (P for interaction trend = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for recurrent CHD in postmenopausal women and that treatment with estrogen and progestin lowers Lp(a) levels. Estrogen and progestin therapy appears to have a more favorable effect (relative to placebo) in women with high initial Lp(a) levels than in women with low levels. This apparent interaction needs confirmation in other trials.

Effect of ritonavir on lipids and post-heparin lipase activities in normal subjects.

BACKGROUND: Intensive therapy of HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) dramatically reduces viral loads and improves immune status. Abnormalities of lipid levels, body fat distribution, and insulin resistance have been commonly reported after starting HAART. Whether the lipid abnormalities result from changes in metabolism after an improvement in HIV status or are partly attributable to the effects of protease inhibitor use is unknown. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers participated in a 2 week double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effect of the protease inhibitor ritonavir on total lipids, apolipoproteins, and post-heparin plasma lipase activities. RESULTS: Those taking ritonavir (n = 11) had significantly higher levels of plasma triglyceride, VLDL cholesterol, IDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) compared with placebo (n = 8). HDL cholesterol was lower with therapy as a result of a reduction in HDL3 cholesterol. Post-heparin lipoprotein lipase (LpL) activity did not change but hepatic lipase activity decreased 20% (P < 0.01) in those taking ritonavir-compared with placebo. Although all lipoprotein subfractions became triglyceride enriched, most of the increase in triglyceride was in VLDL and not in IDL particles. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ritonavir in the absence of HIV infection or changes in body composition results in hypertriglyceridemia that is apparently not mediated by impaired LpL activity or the defective removal of remnant lipoproteins, but could be caused by enhanced formation of VLDL. Long-term studies of patients with HIV infection receiving HAART will be necessary to determine the impact of these drugs and associated dyslipidemia on the risk of coronary artery disease.

Dietary intake of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of primary cardiac arrest.

Whether the dietary intake of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) from seafood reduces the risk of ischemic heart disease remains a source of controversy, in part because studies have yielded inconsistent findings. Results from experimental studies in animals suggest that recent dietary intake of long-chain n-3 PUFAs, compared with saturated and monounsaturated fats, reduces vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation, a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia that is a major cause of ischemic heart disease mortality. Until recently, whether a similar effect of long-chain n-3 PUFAs from seafood occurred in humans was unknown. We summarize the findings from a population-based case-control study that showed that the dietary intake of long-chain n-3 PUFAs from seafood, measured both directly with a questionnaire and indirectly with a biomarker, is associated with a reduced risk of primary cardiac arrest in humans. The findings also suggest that 1) compared with no seafood intake, modest dietary intake of long-chain n-3 PUFAs from seafood (equivalent to 1 fatty fish meal/wk) is associated with a reduction in the risk of primary cardiac arrest; 2) compared with modest intake, higher intakes of these fatty acids are not associated with a further reduction in such risk; and 3) the reduced risk of primary cardiac arrest may be mediated, at least in part, by the effect of dietary n-3 PUFA intake on cell membrane fatty acid composition. These findings also may help to explain the apparent inconsistencies in earlier studies of long-chain n-3 PUFA intake and ischemic heart disease.

Evaluating niacin in its various forms.

Niacin is available in a number of different formulations according to the speed of drug release. The nomenclature is not standardized, and many names are used interchangeably, creating confusion. Formulations that differ in time of release may have different lipid effects and vary in their adverse reaction profiles. Studies comparing immediate-release with various time-release formulations illustrate these variations. Studies have found immediate-release and the intermediate, or extended-release, once-a-day, prescription form of niacin (i.e., Niaspan), to be essentially equivalent with respect to their efficacy in reducing triglycerides and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). However, there are fewer side effects and better compliance associated with the latter form.

Estradiol 17beta inhibition of LDL oxidation and endothelial cell cytotoxicity is opposed by progestins to different degrees.

UNLABELLED: Progestins oppose the effects of estrogens in many biological systems, but it is not known if progestins oppose the antioxidant effects of estrogen and to differing degrees. To test these questions, the effects of various sex steroids on LDL oxidation and cytotoxicity were studied in the absence or presence of endothelial cells. Freshly isolated LDL was incubated in the presence of Cu(++) in the absence or presence of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells in phenol red-free medium and without or with hormones in 0.5% ethanol. The hormones included 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), progesterone (Pg), norgestimate (NGM), levonorgestrel (LNG), and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). LDL oxidation was measured as formation of conjugated dienes, lipid peroxides, and TBARS, and cyotoxicity by tetrazolium salt reduction (MTT reduction). Progestins diminished conjugated diene lag phase, accelerated lipid peroxide and TBARS production in the absence and presence of cells and accelerated cytotoxicity. When E(2) and progestin were incubated with cells at a molar ratio of 1:5, lipid peroxides were reduced from baseline by E(2) alone 31%, E(2)/Pg 29%, E(2)/NGM 16%, E(2)/LNG 9% (all P<0.05 or more) and E(2)/MPA 8% (ns) (E(2) or E(2)E(2)/NGM, E(2)/LNG and E(2)/MPA [P<0.001]; E(2)E(2)/LNG or E(2)/MPA [P<0.05]). MTT reduction followed a similar gradient, greatest with E(2) alone, least with E(2)/MPA. CONCLUSIONS: Progestins promote LDL oxidation and, conjointly, endothelial cell cytotoxicity. Progestins oppose the antioxidant and cytoprotective effects of estrogen when given in combination. MPA and LNG have the strongest prooxidant and cytotoxic effects, which may limit the cardiovascular benefit of estrogen during combined administration in vivo.