Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anal Cell Pathol ; 22(4): 211-21, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11564897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of conventional oral exfoliative cytology taken from white-spotted, ulcerated or other suspicious oral lesions in our clinic. In addition we checked DNA-image cytometry as an adjuvant diagnostic tool. Our hypothesis is that DNA-aneuploidy is a sensitive and specific marker for the early identification of tumor cells in oral brushings. STUDY DESIGN: 251 cytological diagnoses obtained from exfoliative smears of 181 patients from macroscopically suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa and from clinically seemingly benign oral lesions which were excised for establishing histological diagnoses were compared with histological and/or clinical follow-ups of the respective patients. Additionally nuclear DNA-contents were measured after Feulgen restaining using a TV image analysis system. RESULTS: Sensitivity of our cytological diagnosis on oral smears for the detection of cancer cells was 94.6%, specificity 99.5%, positive predictive value 98.1% and negative predictive value 98.5%. DNA-aneuploidy was assumed if abnormal DNA-stemlines or cells with DNA-content greater 9c were observed. On this basis the prevalence of DNA-aneuploidy in smears of oral squamous cell carcinomas in situ or invasive carcinomas was 96.4%. Sensitivity of DNA-aneuploidy in oral smears for the detection of cancer cells was 96.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative 99.0%. The combination of both techniques increased the sensitivity to 98.2%, specificity to 100%, positive predictive value to 100% and negative to 99.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Brush cytology of all visible oral lesions, if they are clinically considered as suspicious for cancer, are an easily practicable, cheap, non-invasive, painless, safe and accurate screening method for detection of oral precancerous lesions, carcinoma in situ or invasive squamous cell carcinoma in all stages. We conclude that DNA-image cytometry is a very sensitive, highly specific and objective adjuvant tool for the early identification of neoplastic epithelial cells in oral smears.


Subject(s)
Cytological Techniques , DNA/metabolism , Image Cytometry/methods , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/genetics , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Aneuploidy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , DNA/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol ; 23(2): 151-60, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11332082

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of conventional cytology, DNA image cytometry, immunocytochemistry and argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) analysis for the diagnosis of malignant cells in serous effusions. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred twenty effusions, 40 with carcinoses, 40 with malignant mesotheliomas and 40 without tumor cells on follow-up were studied by conventional cytology and three adjunctive methods. RESULTS: Unequivocal tumor cells were detected in 92.5% of effusions due to carcinoses and in 45% due to mesotheliomas. Applying immunocytochemistry with BerEP-4 positivity and DNA image cytometry with aneuploidy as a marker revealed 100% of carcinoses and 71.7% of mesotheliomas. Applying the experimentally found thresholds of 2.5 AgNORs as "satellites" and 4.5 AgNORs as "satellites and clusters" together as mean values per nucleus resulted in a 95% correct rate of mesothelioma and 100% rate of carcinoma cell identification without false positive diagnoses. CONCLUSION: AgNOR analysis may be a useful adjunct to other methods in the routine diagnosis of malignant serous effusions. It seems to be the most sensitive method in early cytologic diagnosis of mesotheliomas in effusions. Seventy-three percent of malignant mesotheliomas were diagnosed cytologically at first on effusions. Forty-seven percent of patients with malignant mesotheliomas were identified at the early tumor stage T1 N0 M0.


Subject(s)
Ascitic Fluid/pathology , Cytodiagnosis/methods , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Pericardial Effusion/pathology , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneuploidy , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Child , Child, Preschool , DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , Female , Humans , Image Cytometry , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Nucleolus Organizer Region/pathology , Silver Staining
3.
Anal Cell Pathol ; 19(1): 7-20, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10661621

ABSTRACT

To determine the prevalence of immunocytochemical positivities for a panel of antibodies in benign and malignant cells in effusions with known follow-up in order to use these as diagnostic markers. Besides their ability to identify malignant epithelial cells their contribution to the differential diagnosis between carcinomatoses and mesotheliomas was investigated. 101 tumour cell positive and 53 negative effusions were stained with 12 different antibodies. Results were scored semiquantitatively per cell type. Furthermore, DNA-image cytometry was performed. While prevalence of Ber-EP4 positivity was 95.4% in metastatic carcinoma cells, it was 0% in those from mesotheliomas. No cell type reacted with this marker in benign effusions (0%). Ber-EP4 correctly differentiated between metastatic carcinoma and mesothelioma in 98.0%. Prevalence of DNA-aneuploidy was 95.4% in metastatic carcinomas, 57.1% in mesotheliomas and 0% in reactive effusions. Combining immunocytochemistry (Ber-EP4 positivity) and DNA-image cytometry (aneuploidy) results in a 100% detection of metastatic carcinomatoses and 57.1% of mesotheliomas. Both markers furthermore allowed a correct differentiation of these entities in 98%.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma/chemistry , Image Cytometry , Immunohistochemistry , Mesothelioma/chemistry , Aneuploidy , Antigens, Surface/analysis , Ascitic Fluid/chemistry , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma/diagnosis , DNA/analysis , Diagnosis, Differential , Epitopes/analysis , Humans , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Pericardial Effusion/chemistry , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/chemistry
4.
Anal Cell Pathol ; 19(2): 59-66, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10746435

ABSTRACT

To determine sensitivity and specificity of different antibodies for the immunocytochemical detection of malignant cells in diagnostically equivocal effusions in comparison with those achieved by DNA-image cytometry. 65 cytologically doubtful effusions of the serous cavities were stained with twelve antibodies. Furthermore, DNA-image cytometry was performed. Data were correlated with patient follow-up. Sensitivity of cellular staining of Ber-EP4 for the identification of malignant cells was 77.8%, specificity of absent staining for benign cells was 100%. Positive predictive value for the identification of malignant cells was 100%, negative value 65.5%. Sensitivity of DNA-aneuploidy for the identification of malignancy was 82.9%, specificity of DNA-non-aneuploidy for benignity 94.7%. The positive predictive value of DNA-aneuploidy for the occurrence of malignant cells was 96.7%. Negative predictive value of DNA-non-aneuploidy was 72.0%. Combining immunocytochemistry applying Ber-EP4 only and DNA-cytometry in equivocal effusions resulted in a sensitivity of 88.9% for the identification of malignant cells associated with a 95.0% specificity. Positive predictive value was 97.7%, the negative one 79.2%.


Subject(s)
DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , Image Cytometry/methods , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Pleural Effusion/pathology , Aneuploidy , Antibody Specificity , Ascitic Fluid/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Image Cytometry/standards , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Neoplasm Proteins/analysis , Neoplasm Proteins/immunology , Pericardial Effusion/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staining and Labeling/methods , Staining and Labeling/standards
5.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol ; 20(3): 162-8, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9642442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The sensitivity of conventional cytology for identification of neoplastic cells in effusions is unsatisfactory, about 58%. The rate of diagnostically equivocal effusions in routine cytology is about 6%. DNA aneuploidy has previously been proven to be a sensitive and specific marker for the identification of tumor cells in effusions. In the present study we determined if malignancy can be identified in cytologically equivocal cells in effusions using DNA aneuploidy as a marker, thus decreasing the rate of cytologically equivocal diagnoses in effusions. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred cytologically equivocal effusions of the serous cavities were obtained from routine diagnostic material. Nuclear DNA content was measured after Feulgen staining using a TV image analysis system. Data were correlated with patient follow-up. RESULTS: DNA aneuploidy was assumed if abnormal DNA stemlines, a coefficient of variation of the first DNA stemline > or = 10% or cells > 9c were observed. The sensitivity of DNA aneuploidy for the identification of malignancy was 55.9%. Specificity of DNA nonaneuploidy for benignity was 94.1%. The positive predictive value of the marker DNA aneuploidy for the occurrence of malignant cells was 97.9% since all but one DNA aneuploid case showed malignancy in follow-up. CONCLUSION: Image cytometry applying DNA aneuploidy as a parameter is able to detect the occurrence of malignant cells in cytologically equivocal effusions in about every second case. Thus, this method is able to increase diagnostic accuracy of conventional effusion cytology by decreasing the rate of diagnostically equivocal effusions.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Ascitic Fluid/diagnosis , Carcinoma/diagnosis , DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , Image Cytometry/methods , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/diagnosis , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ascitic Fluid/genetics , Ascitic Fluid/pathology , Carcinoma/genetics , Carcinoma/pathology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Humans , Mesothelioma/genetics , Mesothelioma/pathology , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/genetics , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/genetics , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...