[Current state of refractive surgery of the cornea and lens]. / Derzeitiger Stand der refraktiven Chirurgie an Hornhaut und Linse.

Refractive surgery includes all procedures which are primarily targeted at changing the refractive power of the eye. Currently laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is indicated to correct myopia of up to - 8 D, hyperopia up to + 3 D and astigmatism up to 5 D. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) are primarily recommended for myopia up to - 6 D and for greater refractive errors, phakic intraocular lenses (IOL) are the first choice (myopia greater than - 6 D and hyperopia greater than + 3 D). If presbyopia is present in addition to the high refractive error, refractive lens exchange is another alternative.

[Evaluation and quality assurance of refractive surgery procedures by the German Ophthalmological Society and the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists]. / Bewertung und Qualitätssicherung refraktiv-chirurgischer Eingriffe durch die DOG und den BVA.

The Commission of Refractive Surgery (KRC), which is a combined commission of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists (BVA), has made an up-to-date evaluation of the operative techniques for the correction of refraction errors. Refractive surgery has been accepted into the catalogue of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians for individual health services to be financed. In the guidelines drawn up by the KRC for evaluation and safeguarding the quality of refractive surgical procedures, the 1) description, 2) the area of application and limitations and 3) side-effects and complications of each procedure are given according to the published scientific literature. By this means a comprehensive explanation for and investigation of patients should be safeguarded, optimal treatment results achieved and complications avoided. Refractive surgery is an ophthalmological invasive surgical operation which necessitates specialist knowledge. When carrying out such procedures, the general guidelines of the Federal Medical Council on quality assurance of ambulant operations must be followed. Furthermore, the following prerequisites must be fulfilled by KRC physicians: Participation in a theoretical course (basic course and extended course) recognised by and carried out in cooperation with the KRC Participation in a Wet laboratory recognised by the KRC Practical experience with a trainer recognised by the KRC The first surgical operations to be carried out in the presence of a trainer recognised by the KRC Fulfil equipment and spatial requisites as well as procedural quality. All physicians who fulfil these prerequisites can apply to be named in the official list of suppliers and after fulfilling the prerequisites will be awarded a certificate on application.

[Complications of refractive excimer laser surgery]. / Komplikationen der Excimerlaser-Chirurgie zur Behandlung von Refraktionsfehlern.

In surface ablation, haze is the most frequent complication. After LASIK, microkeratome-related complications are rare today and usually resolve without sequelae, provided no ablation was done. Postoperative flap complications such as flap slippage usually occur during the first few days after surgery and should be treated as early whenever present. Interface complications are a new diagnostic entity as the interface between flap and stroma presents a space where fluid or cells can accumulate. Diffuse lamellar keratitis usually occurs within the first few postoperative days and should be treated aggressively to avoid scarring. Epithelial ingrowth is another rare complication usually requiring treatment. Corneal hydrops with fluid accumulation in the interface is a very rare but important phenomenon related to steroid-induced glaucoma but presenting with false low tonometry readings. Corneal ectasia is extremely rare and in most cases related to thin stromal beds. However, its pathogenesis is not yet completely understood, and it may occur in "normal" eyes, too. Dry eye syndrome is the most frequent complication after LASIK. It is usually benign but may cause significant visual impairment in rare cases.

[Results of implantation of a Worst Iris Claw Lens for correction of high myopia]. / Ergebnisse nach Implantation einer Worst Iris Claw Lens zur Korrektur der hohen Myopie.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate refraction, best visual acuity and anterior chamber flare after implantation of a Worst Iris Claw Lens to correct high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1996 to February 1999 the implantation of a Worst Iris Claw lens was performed on 44 highly myopic phakic eyes of 28 patients. Data after 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was--17.35 +/- 3.57 dpt and 6 months after implantation 79% of the eyes were within +/- 1.0 dpt of target refraction. The mean best corrected visual acuity increased from 0.43 preoperatively to 0.65 postoperatively and 6 months after the treatment there was no flare (< 10 photons/ms) in 21% and a mild anterior chamber flare (10-80 photons/ms) in 76% of the treated eyes. The median laser flare was 20 p/ms. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, implantation of a Worst Iris Claw lens has proved to be a precise method to correct high myopia. No or mild anterior chamber flare and a good visual acuity were measured in most eyes 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Longer follow-up periods are needed to assess the long-term safety and efficiency.

[Virtual reality in ophthalmological education]. / Virtuelle Realitäten für die augenchirurgische Ausbildung.

We present a computer-based medical training workstation for the simulation of intraocular eye surgery. The surgeon manipulates two original instruments inside a mechanical model of the eye. The instrument positions are tracked by CCD cameras and monitored by a PC which renders the scenery using a computer-graphic model of the eye and the instruments. The simulator incorporates a model of the operation table, a mechanical eye, three CCD cameras for the position tracking, the stereo display, and a computer. The three cameras are mounted under the operation table from where they can observe the interior of the mechanical eye. Using small markers the cameras recognize the instruments and the eye. Their position and orientation in space is determined by stereoscopic back projection. The simulation runs with more than 20 frames per second and provides a realistic impression of the surgery. It includes the cold light source which can be moved inside the eye and the shadow of the instruments on the retina which is important for navigational purposes.

Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria.

PURPOSE: To compare bilateral implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal lens with respect to visual function, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. SETTING: Seven clinical sites in Germany and 1 site in Austria. METHODS: A prospective randomized masked clinical trial included 124 randomly assigned bilateral pseudophakic individuals, 64 of whom had bilateral implantation of an Array(R) foldable multifocal IOL (model SA-40N, Allergan) and 60 of whom had bilateral implantation of an AMO(R)PhacoFlex II(R) silicone monofocal IOL (model SI-40NB). Clinical data included binocular uncorrected and corrected distance and near visual acuities, complications, adverse events, and reports of halos and glare. Quality-of-life data were collected on 3 occasions using the modified Cataract TyPE Specification instrument. The functional status of the 2 groups was compared from baseline to final postoperative interview. RESULTS: Three months after surgery, a higher proportion in the Array group achieved a Jaeger value of J3 (20/40 Snellen) or better uncorrected binocular near visual acuity and 0.5 (20/40) or better distance-corrected binocular near visual acuity than in the monofocal groups (97% versus 68% and 95% versus 59%, respectively; P <.001). A higher proportion in the multifocal group achieved both 0.5 (20/40) and J3 or better uncorrected binocular distance and near visual acuities (97% versus 66%; P <.001). Those in the Array group were more likely than those in the monofocal group to never wear glasses overall (41% versus 12%; P <.001). Multifocal patients rated their vision without glasses better overall, at near and at intermediate distances (P <.05), and demonstrated better visual function for near tasks and social activities. CONCLUSIONS: Those who had bilateral implantation of the Array multifocal IOL obtained better uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuities and reported better overall vision, less limitation in visual function, and less spectacle dependency than patients with bilateral monofocal IOLs.

Treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism by customized laser in situ keratomileusis based on corneal topography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictability, efficacy, and safety of customized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) based on corneal topography in myopia and myopic astigmatism. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fourteen patients (eyes) with myopia of -1 to -6 diopters (D) and astigmatism of 0 to -4 D (low myopia group), and 89 patients (eyes) with myopia of -6.10 to -12.00 D and astigmatism of 0 to -4.00 D (high myopia group). INTERVENTION: LASIK was performed with the Hansatome Microkeratome and the Keracor 217 spot-scanning excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb Surgical Technolas, Munich, Germany). Individual ablation patterns were calculated on the basis of elevation data obtained with the Orbscan II corneal topography system (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Irvine, CA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest spectacle refraction, visual acuity, and change in visual acuity at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: At 3 months, 51 patients in the low myopia group and 40 patients in the high myopia group were available. In the low (high) myopia group, 96.1% (75.0%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 82.4% (62.5%), 20/25 or better in 98.0% (70.0%), and 20/40 or better in 100% (95.0%). A loss of two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity occurred in 3.9% of the low and 5. 0% of the high myopia group. In low myopia, spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/12.5 or better in 5.9% preoperatively and in 13.7% at 3 months and 20/15 or better in 37.3% and 47.1%, respectively. Differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The customized LASIK based on corneal topography used in this study showed high predictability and efficacy in myopia and myopic astigmatism of -1.00 to -6.00 D, and could possibly improve spectacle-corrected visual acuity in myopia of -1.00 to -6.00 D. Predictability and efficacy were somewhat lower in myopia and myopic astigmatism of -6.10 to -12.00 D. In both groups, a small number of patients lost two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

Topographically-guided laser in situ keratomileusis to treat corneal irregularities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictability and safety of topographically guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to treat corneal irregularities. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients (29 eyes) with postsurgical corneal irregularities, divided into four subgroups (postkeratoplasty, 6 eyes; posttrauma, 6 eyes; postphotorefractive keratectomy (PRK)/LASIK with decentered or small ablations, 11 eyes; post-PRK/LASIK with central islands, 6 eyes). INTERVENTION: LASIK was performed using the Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Keracor 117 C spot-scanning excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb Surgical Technolas, Munich, Germany). Individual ablation patterns were calculated on the basis of axial radii of curvature data obtained with the Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys Premier, Irvine, CA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change of corneal topography pattern, patient satisfaction, manifest spectacle refraction, and visual acuity at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Corneal topography showed improved corneal regularity in 66% of eyes in the postkeratoplasty group, whereas 34% remained irregular. In the posttrauma group, 83% improved and 17% remained irregular. In the decentered/small optical zone group, 91 % improved and 9% remained irregular. In the central islands group, 50% improved and 50% remained irregular. Refractive cylinder decreased from 5.83 +/- 1.25 diopters (D) to 2.96 +/- 1.23 D in the postkeratoplasty group (P = 0.01), from 2.21 +/- 1.35 D to 0.50 +/- 0.84 D in the posttrauma group (P = 0.001), from 0.73 +/- 0.71 D to 0.36 +/- 1.05 D in the decentered/small optical zone group (NS), and from 1.42 +/- 1.13 D to 0.50 +/- 0.84 D in the central island group (P = 0.01). Uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/200 +/- 0.07 to 20/50 +/- 0.17 in the postkeratoplasty group (P = 0.01), from 20/83 +/- 0.12 to 20/50 +/- 0.28 in the posttrauma group (P = 0.01), from 20/60 +/- 0.16 to 20/50 +/- 0.29 in the decentered/small optical zone group (NS), and from 20/71 +/- 0.12 to 20/60 +/- 0.24 in the central island group (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The topographically-guided LASIK method used in this study resulted in a significant reduction of refractive cylinder, a significant increase of uncorrected visual acuity, and improved corneal regularity in a large percentage of patients with severe corneal irregularities such as decentered/small optical zones after LASIK or irregular astigmatism after keratoplasty or trauma. With small irregularities such as central islands, results were sufficiently poor to advise against the use of our technique in these patients.

Delayed anterior ischemic optic neuropathy after neck dissection.

There are only 2 published cases of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) occurring after neck dissection, to our knowledge. We report a case of bilateral AION following neck dissection, discuss the differential diagnoses, and compare the features of this case with those of previously described cases. There were none of the previously described risk factors for the development of AION after head and neck surgery (eg, hypotension, facial edema, or sudden massive hemorrhage) in this case, but there was prolonged diffuse postoperative bleeding. Also, the symptoms did not arise before the fifth postoperative day as they did in the other cases. Prolonged, mild postoperative bleeding is a risk factor for AION. Visual loss during the entire first postoperative week has to be regarded as a complication of surgery, requires the exclusion of several differential diagnoses, and must not be confounded with the patient's confusion or symptoms of withdrawal.

[Correction of myopia and astigmatism using topography-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (TopoLink LASIK)]. / Myopie- und Astigmatismuskorrektur mittels topographiegestützter Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis (TopoLink LASIK).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 114 patients (eyes) with myopia of -1 to 6 D and astigmatism of 0 to -4 D (group 1), and 89 patients (eyes) with myopia of -6.1 to -12 D and astigmatism of 0 to -4 D (group 2). All treatments were calculated on the basis of corneal topography measured with the Orbscan II system. The Keracor 217 excimer laser and the Hansatome microkeratome were used. RESULTS: At 3 months, 51 patients in the low myopia group and 40 patients in the high myopia group were available for examination. In the low (high) myopia group, 96.1% (75.0%) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia, and uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 82.4% (62.5%), 20/25 or better in 98.0% (70.0%), and 20/40 or better in 100% (95.0%). A loss of two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity occurred in 3.9% of the low and 5.0% of the high myopia group. In low myopia, spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/12.5 or better in 5.9% preoperatively and in 13.7% at three months and 20/15 or better in 37.3% and 47.1%, respectively (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LASIK based on corneal topography showed very high efficacy in low and moderate myopia with astigmatism, and maximal visual acuity could even be improved in some cases. There was somewhat less precision in high myopia with astigmatism.

[Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)]. / Komplikationen der Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis (LASIK).

BACKGROUND: The incidence and course of intraoperative and postoperative complications of LASIK were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We consecutively treated 598 eyes (316 patients) using the Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Keracor 117 C excimer laser. One hundred and sixty-three eyes were also available at 12 months. The preoperative spherical equivalent was -5.31 +/- 5.49 D (+9 to -23 D). We evaluated intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Intraoperative complications of keratotomy were observed in 1.3% (irregular cut, n = 5; free cap, n = 2; incomplete cap, n = 1), and other intraoperative complications in 1.7% (epithelial defects, n = 7; flap dislocation, n = 1; lateral kanthotomy required, n = 2). None of these complications caused any long-term effects or loss of two or more lines of visual acuity. Postoperative complications were observed in 0.9% (peripheral epithelial ingrowth, n = 4; keratectasia, n = 1; subretinal neovascularisation, n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complications in LASIK is low, and intraoperative complications did not cause any significant loss of vision. We observed keratectasia in one eye, which suggests that deep ablations should be avoided, which limits the amount of correction possible.

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyeropia and hyperopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: LASIK was performed using the Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Keracor 117C excimer laser on 192 hyperopic eyes with astigmatism of less than 1.00 D (spherical group) and 164 hyperopic eyes with corneal astigmatism of 1.00 to 7.50 D (toric group). RESULTS: At 12 months after LASIK, 110 eyes were available for follow-up examination. In low spherical hyperopia (+1.00 to +3.00 D), 13 eyes (55%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia and none lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. In low toric hyperopia (+1.00 to +3.00 D), 14 eyes (61%) were within +/-0.50 D and none lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. In moderate spherical hyperopia (+3.10 to +5.00 D) 9 eyes (44%) were within +/-0.50 D and none lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity and in moderate toric hyperopia (+3.10 to +5.00 D) 5 eyes (36%) were within +/-0.50 D and 2 eyes (14%) lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. In high spherical hyperopia (+5.10 to +9.00 D), 6 eyes (38%) were within +/-0.50 D and 2 eyes (13%) lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and in high toric hyperopia (+5.10 to +9.50 D) 4 eyes (31%) were within +/-0.50 D and 2 eyes (15%) lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK seems to be reasonably effective and safe in spherical hyperopia of +1.00 to +5.00 D but less effective for hyperopic astigmatism. For hyperopia greater than +5.00 D, loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity occurred in a significant number of eyes and accuracy was sufficiently poor to advise against LASIK in these eyes.

[Twilight visual acuity after correction of myopia with LASIK]. / Dämmerungssehvermögen nach Myopiekorrektur mittels LASIK.

BACKGROUND: Data on mesopic vision after LASIK are not available to date. We therefore evaluated mesopic vision in myopic eyes before and after LASIK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven eyes (34 patients) treated using the Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Keracor 117CT spot-scanning excimer laser were included. All eyes had best-corrected vision of 20/25 or better preoperatively. We measured spectacle refraction, visual acuity, and mesopic vision without and with glare (Nyktometer, Rodenstock) both preoperatively and 1 year after LASIK. Results were evaluated in three groups with reference to baseline refraction, and numbers of patients who saw a contrast of 1:5 or less were compared. RESULTS: Myopia -1 to -5 D (group 1; n = 26): Preoperatively (postoperatively), 89% (96%) (P = 0.03) of eyes identified a contrast of 1:5 or less without glare, while 65% (73%) achieved that level with glare. Myopia -5.1 to -10 D (group 2; n = 24): Preoperatively (postoperatively), 83% (75%) of eyes identified a contrast of 1:5 or less without glare, while 50% (21%) achieved that level with glare. Myopia -10.1 to -15 D (group 3; n = 11): Preoperatively (postoperatively), 73% (55%) of eyes identified a contrast of 1:5 or less without glare, while 46% (27%) achieved that level with glare. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK seems to cause a reduction of mesopic vision under glare conditions in corrections of more than -5 D. In corrections of more than -10 D, mesopic vision without glare is reduced, too. However, differences were not statistically significant when comparing vision at contrasts of 1:5 and lower. In addition, mesopic is considerably reduced in high myopes even preoperatively.

LASIK for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism--results of a pilot study.

Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was evaluated in hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. LASIK was safe and effective in spherical hyperopia up to +5 D and acceptable in toric hyperopia up to +5 D but results were poor in hyperopia of more than +5 D.

[LASIK for myopia correction. 2-year follow-up]. / LASIK zur Myopiekorrektur. 2-Jahres-Ergebnisse.

BACKGROUND: Long-term results on LASIK are not available to date. We therefore evaluated the predictability, stability and complication rate after LASIK in moderate--to-high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 70 eyes (41 patients) using the Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Keracor 116 excimer laser. Patients were followed for 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. Spectacle refraction, visual acuity, rate of retreatment, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: At 24 months the results were as follows: Myopia -5 to -9.9 D (n = 18): 94% within 1 D; regression between 1 and 12 (12 and 24) months > 1 D in 6% (6%); uncorrected acuity 20/40 or better in 83%; no loss of 2 ore more lines of visual acuity; 89% highly satisfied. Myopia -10 to -14.9 D (n = 12): 88% within 1 D; regression between 1 and 12 (12 and 24) months > 1 D in 20% (0%); uncorrected acuity 20/40 or better in 72%; 4% lost 2 or more lines of visual acuity; 96% highly satisfied. Myopia -15 to -29 D (n = 22): 33% within 1 D; regression between 1 and 12 (12 and 24) months > 1 D in 41% (18%); uncorrected acuity 20/40 or better in 7%; no loss of 2 or more lines of visual acuity; 67% highly satisfied. CONCLUSION: LASIK is an accurate, effective and stable procedure for correcting myopia of -5 to -10 D. Results are less precise in myopia up to -15 D, and some visual loss occurs in a number of patients. In myopia > -15 D, results are not satisfactory because of poor accuracy and low stability.

Laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in myopia and myopic astigmatism. DESIGN: The study design was a prospective, unmasked, nonrandomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participating were 25 patients with myopia (37 eyes) with astigmatism of less than 1.00 diopter (D), divided into 3 subgroups (-5.00 to -9.90 D, 8 eyes; -10.00 to -14.90 D, 10 eyes; -15.00 to -29.00 D, 19 eyes), and 37 patients with myopia (56 eyes) with corneal astigmatism of 1.00 to 4.50 D, divided into 3 subgroups (-5.00 to -9.90 D, 12 eyes; -10.00 to -14.90 D, 24 eyes; -15.00 to -29.00 D, 20 eyes). INTERVENTION: LASIK was performed using the Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Keracor 116 excimer laser. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, manifest refraction, central corneal islands, ablation decentration, and patient satisfaction were measured. RESULTS: At 12 months, predictability, regression between 1 and 12 months, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), loss of two or more lines of corrected visual acuity, and patient satisfaction of the spherical (toric) groups are reported. Subgroups -5.00 to -9.90 D: 100% (75%) +1.00 D; regression less than or equal to 1.00 D in 100% (91.7%); UCVA greater than or equal to 20/40 in 87.5% (70%); none lost two or more lines; 100% (84%) highly satisfied. Subgroups -10.00 to -14.90 D: 60% (78.3%) +/-1.00 D; regression less than or equal to 1.00 D in 100% (87%); UCVA greater than or equal to 20/40 in 77.8% (86.4%); 10% (4.3%) lost two lines; 90% (91%) highly satisfied. Subgroups -15.00 to -29.00 D: 38.9% (21.4%) +/-1.00 D; regression less than or equal to 1.00 D in 72.2% (64.3%); UCVA greater than or equal to 20/40 in 33.3% (40%); 5.6% (7.1%) lost two lines; 78% (50%) highly satisfied. Differences of predictability and change of manifest refraction between subgroups of -5.00 to -9.90 D and -15.00 to -29.00 D were statistically significant. Central islands (decentrations) were observed in 17% (5.6%) of eyes of the spherical and in 16% (4.1%) of the toric group. Overall, the corneal interface was visible in 8.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The LASIK method used in this study showed stability of manifest refraction and adequate uncorrected central visual acuity in a large percentage of patients with myopia up to -15.00 D. Corneal stability was not as uniform. Central corneal islands were observed in a sizable minority of patients despite pretreatment. For myopia greater than 15.00 D, accuracy and patient satisfaction were sufficiently poor to advise against using the authors' treatment technique in these groups. Visually significant microkeratome and laser-related problems were noted in a smaller percentage of patients. Patients with astigmatism correction were less pleased with results than were patients who received spherical corrections.