ABSTRACT
Through many decades of preclinical research, great progress has been achieved in understanding the complex nature of spinal cord injury (SCI). Preclinical research efforts have guided and shaped clinical trials, which are growing in number by the year. Currently, 1,149 clinical trials focused on improving outcomes after SCI are registered in the U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov. We conducted a systematic analysis of these SCI clinical trials, using publicly accessible data downloaded from ClinicalTrials.gov. After extracting all available data for these trials, we categorized each trial according to the types of interventions being tested and the types of outcomes assessed. We then evaluated clinical trial characteristics, both globally and by year, in order to understand the areas of growth and change over time. With regard to clinical trial attributes, we found that most trials have low enrollment, only test single interventions, and have limited numbers of primary outcomes. Some gaps in reporting are apparent; for instance, over 75% of clinical trials with "Completed" status do not have results posted, and the Phase of some trials is incorrectly classified as "Not applicable" despite testing a drug or biological compound. When analyzing trials based on types of interventions assessed, we identified the largest representation in trials testing rehab/training/exercise, neuromodulation, and behavioral modifications. Most highly represented primary outcomes include motor function of the upper and lower extremities, safety, and pain. The most highly represented secondary outcomes include quality of life and pain. Over the past 15 years, we identified increased representation of neuromodulation and rehabilitation trials, and decreased representation of drug trials. Overall, the number of new clinical trials initiated each year continues to grow, signifying a hopeful future for the clinical treatment of SCI. Together, our work provides a comprehensive glimpse into the past, present, and future of SCI clinical trials, and suggests areas for improvement in clinical trial reporting.
ABSTRACT
Spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently results in immediate and sustained neurological dysfunction, including intractable neuropathic pain in approximately 60-80% of individuals. SCI induces immediate mechanical damage to spinal cord tissue followed by a period of secondary injury in which tissue damage is further propagated, contributing to the development of anatomically unique lesions. Variability in lesion size and location influences the degree of motor and sensory dysfunction incurred by an individual. We predicted that variability in lesion parameters may also explain why some, but not all, experimental animals develop mechanical sensitivity after SCI. To characterize the relationship of lesion anatomy to mechanical allodynia, we utilized a mouse cervical hemicontusion model of SCI that has been shown to lead to the development and persistence of mechanical allodynia in the ipsilateral forelimb after injury. At four weeks post-SCI, the numbers and locations of surviving neurons were quantified along with total lesion volume and nociceptive fiber sprouting. We found that the subset of animals exhibiting mechanical allodynia had significantly increased neuronal sparing in the ipsilateral dorsal horn around the lesion epicenter compared to animals that did not exhibit mechanical allodynia. Additionally, we failed to observe significant differences between groups in nociceptive fiber density in the dorsal horn around the lesion epicenter. Notably, we found that impactor probe displacement upon administration of the SCI surgery was significantly lower in sensitive animals compared with not-sensitive animals. Together, our data indicate that lesion severity negatively correlates with the manifestation of at-level mechanical hypersensitivity and suggests that sparing of dorsal horn neurons may be required for the development of neuropathic pain.
