Associations between feeding and development in preterm infants in the NICU and throughout the first year of life.

BACKGROUND: There is little published evidence regarding associations between feeding and development in preterm infants which could help identify infants most needing follow-up services. AIMS: To determine if preterm infant feeding and development were predictable throughout the first year of life and identify associations with maternal factors, neonatal factors, and socioeconomic measures. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective single-site study of the feeding and development of extremely and very preterm infants at three time points throughout the first year of life. SUBJECTS: Infants <32 weeks gestational age were followed from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge (DC) until 12 months corrected gestational age (CGA). OUTCOME MEASURES: Feeding and development were evaluated at NICU DC, 3 months and 12 months CGA. Maternal health, infant health, and socioeconomic measures were also recorded. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between assessments for feeding and development at each of the three time points: NICU DC (p = 0.026), 3 months CGA (p = 0.001), and 12 months CGA (p = 0.000); however, no associations were found between feeding and development at NICU DC and 12 months CGA (p = 0.137). Of the maternal factors determined to be significant, none were consistent enough as to be considered relevant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that preterm infants with typical feeding and development at DC may go on to develop concerns in these areas, and those who scored abnormally at DC may perform typically during the first year of life. This study affirms the importance of NICU follow-up services to support feeding and development for all infants born <32 weeks gestation.

Swedish Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Understanding of Difficult Airway Algorithms.

PURPOSE: To explore Swedish registered nurse anesthetists' (RNAs') different ways of understanding difficult airway algorithms. DESIGN: A qualitative study design, using a phenomenographic approach, was chosen to describe variations in RNAs' understanding of difficult airway algorithms. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with eighteen RNAs working at three hospitals in Sweden. The data were analyzed using a qualitative method. FINDINGS: Three ways of understanding algorithms were identified: (1) Algorithms constitute a plan not communicated at the clinic; (2) Algorithms constitute a shared plan to improve teamwork; (3) Algorithms constitute a plan for how to think and work systematically. CONCLUSIONS: According to the RNAs, airway management algorithms should be discussed more openly at the workplace. RNAs expressed their desire to have a shared algorithm and to use it as a tool during team simulations. Airway algorithms were seen as constituting a plan for how to think and work systematically to improve patient safety.

Neonatal Therapy Staffing in the United States and Relationships to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Type and Location, Level of Acuity, and Population Factors.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) estimate the total pool of neonatal therapists (occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists who work in the neonatal intensive care unit [NICU]) and the average number represented in each U.S. based NICU, and (2) investigate the relationships between the number and type of neonatal therapy team members to NICU/hospital, population, and therapy factors. STUDY DESIGN: This study used several methods of data collection (surveys, phone calls, and web site searches) that were combined to establish a comprehensive list of factors across each NICU in the United States. RESULTS: We estimate that there are 2,333 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions designated to neonatal therapy coverage, with 4,232 neonatal therapists covering those FTEs. Among 564 NICUs with available neonatal therapy staffing data, 432 (76%) had a dedicated therapy team, 103 (18%) had pro re nata (as the circumstances arise; PRN) therapy coverage only, and 35 (6%) had no neonatal therapy team. Having a dedicated therapy team was more likely in level-IV (n = 112; 97%) and -III (n = 269; 83%) NICUs compared with level-II NICUs (n = 51; 42%; p < 0.001). Having a dedicated therapy team was related to having more NICU beds (p < 0.001), being part of a free-standing children's hospital or children's hospital within a hospital (p < 0.001), and being part of an academic medical center or community hospital (p < 0.001). Having a dedicated therapy team was more common in the Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, and West (p = 0.001) but was not related to the proportion of the community living in poverty or belonging to racial/ethnic minorities (p > 0.05). There was an average of 17 beds per neonatal therapy FTE, a good marker of therapy coverage based on NICU size. Three-hundred U.S. based NICUs (22%) had at least one Certified Neonatal Therapist (CNT) in early 2020, with CNT presence being more likely in higher acuity NICUs (59% of level-IV NICUs had at least one CNT). CONCLUSION: Understanding the composition of neonatal therapy teams at different hospitals across the U.S. can drive change to expand neonatal therapy services aimed at optimizing outcomes of high-risk infants and families. KEY POINTS: · We estimated that there are 4,232 neonatal therapists working in NICUs in the United States.. · Dedicated therapy teams for the NICU are more common in large, high acuity NICUs.. · An average of 17 beds per neonatal therapy FTE was observed.. · In 2020, 22% of NICUs had CNTs, and CNTs were more common in large and high acuity NICUs.. · Benchmarking neonatal therapy staffing can aid in expanding NICU therapy services where needed..

Collaboration to Improve Neuroprotection and Neuropromotion in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Implementation of neuroprotective and neuropromotive (NP2) strategies is essential to optimize outcomes for premature infants. Developmental care, once an addition to medical care, is now recognized by the NICU team as foundational to support long-term neurodevelopment of micropremature infants. A group approach to education and sharing implementation processes can result in collaborative and individual center improvements. This article includes examples of quality improvement (QI) education and tools inspired by implementation of NP2 strategies in a consortium of 11 NICUs in the United States and Canada. Process change guided by potentially better practices are key; however, consistency of application must be included to ensure success. Assessment of NP2 practices via use of surveys and practice audits are described. Increases occurred in family NP2 education and provision of support during painful experiences. There were also increases in skin-to-skin holding, 2-person caregiving, and focus on reducing unnecessary painful procedures.

Collaboration to Improve Neuroprotection and Neuropromotion in the NICU: Team Education and Family Engagement.

The number of babies born extremely low birth weight surviving to be discharged home after experiencing the NICU continues to improve. Unfortunately, early sensory development for these babies occurs in an environment vastly different from the intended in-utero environment and places them at high risk of long-term neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive challenges. Our goal in the NICU must transition from simply discharge home to supporting the neurosensory development necessary for a thriving lifetime. To accomplish a goal of thriving families and thriving babies, it is clear the NICU interprofessional team must share an understanding of neurosensory development, the neuroprotective strategies safeguarding development, the neuropromotive strategies supporting intended maturational development, and the essential nature of family integration in these processes. We share the educational endeavors of 11 center collaboratives in establishing the foundational knowledge necessary to support preterm babies and their families.

How anaesthesiologists understand difficult airway guidelines-an interview study.

BACKGROUND: In the practice of anaesthesia, clinical guidelines that aim to improve the safety of airway procedures have been developed. The aim of this study was to explore how anaesthesiologists understand or conceive of difficult airway management algorithms. METHODS: A qualitative phenomenographic design was chosen to explore anaesthesiologists' views on airway algorithms. Anaesthesiologists working in three hospitals were included. Individual face-to-face interviews were conducted. RESULTS: Four different ways of understanding were identified, describing airway algorithms as: (A) a law-like rule for how to act in difficult airway situations; (B) a cognitive aid, an action plan for difficult airway situations; (C) a basis for developing flexible, personal action plans for the difficult airway; and (D) the experts' consensus, a set of scientifically based guidelines for handling the difficult airway. CONCLUSIONS: The interviewed anaesthesiologists understood difficult airway management guidelines/algorithms very differently.

Awake intubation creates feelings of being in a vulnerable situation but cared for in safe hands: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Awake fiberoptic intubation is an alternative procedure for securing the airway and is a recommended option when a difficult airway is expected. The aim of the present study was to describe patient experiences with this procedure. METHODS: A qualitative, descriptive design was used and patients were recruited from three county hospitals and one university hospital in Sweden. Data was collected by semi-structured interviews with 13 patients who underwent awake fiberoptic intubation. A qualitative content analysis extracted theme, categories, and subcategories. RESULTS: From the patient statements, one main theme emerged, feelings of being in a vulnerable situation but cared for in safe hands, which were described in five categories with 15 subcategories. The categories were: a need for tailored information, distress and fear of the intubation, acceptance and trust of the staff's competence, professional caring and support, and no hesitation about new awake intubation. The patients felt they lacked information about what to expect and relied on the professionals' expertise. Some patients felt overwhelmed by the information they were given and wanted less specific information about the equipment used but more information about how they would be cared for in the operating room. Undergoing awake intubation was an acceptable experience for most patients, whereas others experienced it as being painful and terrifying because they felt they could not breathe or communicate during the procedure itself. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored information about what to expect, ensuring eye contact and breathing instruction during the procedure seems to reduce patient distress when undergoing awake fiberoptic intubation. Most of the patients would not hesitate to undergo awake intubation again in the future if needed.

The best method to predict easy intubation: a quasi-experimental pilot study.

PURPOSE: To facilitate evaluation of the airway before endotracheal intubation, different scores have been developed, mainly to predict difficult airways. However, in anesthesia clinical practice in Sweden, scores would be more useful if they could also predict an easy airway, so that the correct category of anesthesia personnel can be allocated. Therefore, we evaluated whether scoring systems commonly used to predict difficult airways could also predict easy endotracheal intubation. DESIGN: This prospective observational study included patients who were scheduled for general anesthesia and required endotracheal intubation. METHODS: Airways were evaluated preoperatively by two independent variables, namely Mallampati classification and thyromental distance. After anesthesia induction, the Cormack and Lehane grade was assessed. FINDING: Mallampati scores yielded the highest specificity in predicting easy intubation, and Cormack and Lehane grades yielded the highest positive predictive value for predicting easy intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Mallampati classification is an appropriate screening test for predicting easy intubation.

A nationwide postal questionnaire survey: the presence of airway guidelines in anaesthesia department in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, airway guidelines aimed toward improving patient safety have been recommended by the Swedish Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. Adherence to evidence-based airway guidelines is known to be generally poor in Sweden. The aim of this study was to determine whether airway guidelines are present in Swedish anaesthesia departments. METHODS: A nationwide postal questionnaire inquiring about the presence of airway guidelines was sent out to directors of Swedish anaesthesia departments (n = 74). The structured questionnaire was based on a review of the Swedish Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care voluntary recommendations of guidelines for airway management. Mean, standard deviation, minimum/maximum, percentage (%) and number of general anaesthesia performed per year as frequency (n), were used to describe, each hospital type (university, county, private). For comparison between hospitals type and available written airway guidelines were cross tabulation used and analysed using Pearson's Chi-Square tests. A p- value of less than 0 .05 was judged significant. RESULTS: In total 68 directors who were responsible for the anaesthesia departments returned the questionnaire, which give a response rate of 92% (n 68 of 74). The presence of guidelines showing an airway algorithm was reported by 68% of the departments; 52% reported having a written patient information card in case of a difficult airway and guidelines for difficult airways, respectively; 43% reported the presence of guidelines for preoperative assessment; 31% had guidelines for Rapid Sequence Intubation; 26% reported criteria for performing an awake intubation; and 21% reported guidelines for awake fibre-optic intubation. A prescription for the registered nurse anaesthetist for performing tracheal intubation was reported by 24%. The most frequently pre-printed preoperative elements in the anaesthesia record form were dental status and head and neck mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendations from the national anaesthesia society, the presence of airway guidelines in Swedish anaesthesia departments is low. From the perspective of safety for both patients and the anaesthesia staff, airway management guidelines should be considered a higher priority.