Randomized, double-blind study comparing postoperative effects of treatment timing with histamine H-receptor antagonist cimetidine.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of timing of preoperative, postoperative, and placebo administration of the H(2)-antagonist cimetidine on postoperative pain management and the incidence of side-effects. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I to II patients, undergoing major gynaecological abdominal surgery, were randomly divided into three groups, and received a standardized general anaesthesia. The patients in the preoperative ('Pre') group received an intravenous infusion of cimetidine 4 mg kg(-1) prior to anaesthesia induction; the postoperative ('Post') group received the same volume of normal saline. Postoperatively, the patients in the Post group received an intravenous infusion of cimetidine 4 mg kg(-1); the patients in the Pre group received the same volume of normal saline. The Control group received the same volume of normal saline prior to anaesthesia induction and after the end of operation. Postoperatively, all patients were treated with a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia system, which was programmed to deliver 1 mg of morphine on demand for three consecutive days. RESULTS: Pain intensity, morphine consumption, sedation score, and side-effects were recorded and evaluated. We found no difference among the three groups with respect to pain intensities, morphine usage, sedation scores, and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that neither preoperative nor postoperative administration of cimetidine 4 mg kg(-1) provided a pre-emptive or preventive analgesic advantage for postoperative pain or morphine consumption, and that the use of cimetidine failed to reduce the incidence of nausea or vomiting.

Role of beta-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative use of beta-blockers has been advocated as a strategy to prevent cardiac sequelae. This study evaluated the influence of perioperative esmolol administration upon anaesthesia and postoperative pain management amongst patients undergoing hysterectomy. METHODS: Ninety-seven ASA I-II patients, undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy, were randomly divided into one of two groups. Patients in the Esmolol group received an i.v. loading dose of esmolol 0.5 mg kg(-1) followed by infusion of 0.05 mg kg(-1) min(-1) before anaesthesia induction. The infusion was documented at the completion of surgery. The Control group received a volume of normal saline. After surgery, all patients were treated with patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCA), which was programmed to deliver 1 mg of morphine on demand for 3 consecutive days. Pain intensity on movement and at rest, sedation score, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to their characteristics. Patients in the esmolol group received significantly lower end-tidal isoflurane concentrations (1.0 (0.3) vs 1.4 (0.5)%, respectively; P<0.001) and fentanyl (0.9 (0.2) vs 1.2 (0.5) microg kg(-1), respectively; P=0.006) during anaesthesia. They also showed a reduced heart rate and arterial pressure response to tracheal intubation, skin incision, and tracheal extubation. The Esmolol group consumed less PCA morphine in 3 days (37.3 (8.4) vs 54.7 (11.2) mg, respectively; P=0.005). Pain intensity and medication side effects were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that perioperative esmolol administration during anaesthesia reduces the intraoperative use of inhalation anaesthetic and fentanyl, decreases haemodynamic responses, and reduced morphine consumption for the first 3 postoperative days.

The effect of promethazine on postoperative pain: a comparison of preoperative, postoperative, and placebo administration in patients following total abdominal hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Histamine receptors are involved in the development of inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia, and the use of antihistamines is advocated as an alternative for pain therapy and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We investigated the influence of timing of promethazine administration on postoperative pain outcomes. METHODS: Ninety female patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly divided into three groups. All individuals received infusions of promethazine and normal saline before anaesthesia induction, and postoperatively the Pre group received promethazine 0.1 mg kg(-1) before anaesthesia and saline postoperatively, and the Post group received saline before anaesthesia and promethazine 0.1 mg kg(-1) postoperatively, while the Control group received two equivalent volumes of saline. Patients were treated using patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA). The primary endpoint was pain intensity and morphine consumption. The secondary endpoint was postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Postoperative morphine usage was significantly lower in the Pre group (24.1 +/- 3.9 mg) relative to the Post (30.0 +/- 4.6 mg) and Control groups (32.1 +/- 4.8 mg) during the first 24 h postoperatively (P<0.05). The number and incidence of patients suffering from postoperative nausea in the first 24 h was six (21%), seven (23%), and 15 (47%) in the Pre, Post, and Control groups, respectively (P<0.05). The number and incidence of patients vomiting in the first 24 h was three (10%), two (7%), and 10 (32%) in the Pre, Post, and Control groups, respectively (P<0.05). The number of patients asking for rescue antiemetic in the first 24 h was one (3%), two (7%), and seven (22%) in the Pre, Post, and Control groups, respectively (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that preoperative administration of promethazine 0.1 mg kg(-1) reduces postoperative morphine consumption compared with postoperative and placebo administration, and that use of promethazine reduces PONV and the number of patients asking for rescue antiemetic in the first 24 h after surgery when compared with placebo.