Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 4(5): e5231, 2009 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19478941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many different genetic alterations are observed in cancer cells. Individual cancer genes display point mutations such as base changes, insertions and deletions that initiate and promote cancer growth and spread. Somatic hypermutation is a powerful mechanism for generation of different mutations. It was shown previously that somatic hypermutability of proto-oncogenes can induce development of lymphomas. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found an exceptionally high incidence of single-base mutations in the tumor suppressor genes RASSF1 and RBSP3 (CTDSPL) both located in 3p21.3 regions, LUCA and AP20 respectively. These regions contain clusters of tumor suppressor genes involved in multiple cancer types such as lung, kidney, breast, cervical, head and neck, nasopharyngeal, prostate and other carcinomas. Altogether in 144 sequenced RASSF1A clones (exons 1-2), 129 mutations were detected (mutation frequency, MF = 0.23 per 100 bp) and in 98 clones of exons 3-5 we found 146 mutations (MF = 0.29). In 85 sequenced RBSP3 clones, 89 mutations were found (MF = 0.10). The mutations were not cytidine-specific, as would be expected from alterations generated by AID/APOBEC family enzymes, and appeared de novo during cell proliferation. They diminished the ability of corresponding transgenes to suppress cell and tumor growth implying a loss of function. These high levels of somatic mutations were found both in cancer biopsies and cancer cell lines. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first report of high frequencies of somatic mutations in RASSF1 and RBSP3 in different cancers suggesting it may underlay the mutator phenotype of cancer. Somatic hypermutations in tumor suppressor genes involved in major human malignancies offer a novel insight in cancer development, progression and spread.


Subject(s)
Mutation/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , APOBEC-1 Deaminase , Animals , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Clone Cells , Computational Biology , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Expressed Sequence Tags , Founder Effect , Genome/genetics , Hematopoiesis/genetics , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Mice , Mice, SCID , Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.
J Invest Dermatol ; 129(3): 641-9, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18754038

ABSTRACT

The innate defense of the skin against microbial threats is influenced by antimicrobial proteins (AMP). Staphylococcus aureus often colonizes the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). This was explained by diminished expression of AMP including cathelicidin/LL-37, human beta-defensins-2 and -3, and dermcidin. The S100-protein psoriasin is an additional keratinocyte-derived AMP that preferentially kills E. coli. As E. coli infections are not observed in atopic skin we investigated the functional role of psoriasin in AD patients. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated enhanced epidermal psoriasin expression in AD. An up to 1500-fold increase in secreted psoriasin was detected by ELISA in vivo on the surface of AD skin compared to healthy control skin. Surprisingly, tumor necrosis factor-alpha-enhanced psoriasin release in primary keratinocytes was inhibited by the Th2-cytokines IL-4 and -13, whereas IL-17 and -22 induced psoriasin. Epidermal barrier disruption significantly enhanced psoriasin expression as demonstrated by tape stripping in healthy volunteers. The upregulation of psoriasin in AD maybe induced by the disrupted skin barrier offering a possible explanation why these patients do not suffer from skin infections with E. coli. This indicates that the antimicrobial response in AD is not generally impaired, but greatly differs according to the type of AMP produced by the skin.


Subject(s)
Calcium-Binding Proteins/biosynthesis , Calcium-Binding Proteins/physiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Skin/metabolism , Staphylococcus aureus/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/metabolism , Calcium-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Child , Child, Preschool , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Peptides/metabolism , S100 Calcium Binding Protein A7 , S100 Proteins , beta-Defensins/biosynthesis , Cathelicidins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...