Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vaccine ; 26(32): 4015-24, 2008 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18602731

ABSTRACT

Using mathematical models of cervical cancer for the northern and southern regions of Vietnam, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention strategies and the tradeoffs between a national and region-based policy in Vietnam. With 70% vaccination and screening coverage, lifetime risk of cancer was reduced by 20.4-76.1% with vaccination of pre-adolescent girls and/or screening of older women. Only when the cost per vaccinated girl was low (i.e., I$100), screening alone was most cost-effective. When optimal policies differed between regions, implementing a national strategy resulted in health and economic inefficiencies. HPV vaccination appears to be an attractive cervical cancer prevention strategy for Vietnam, provided high coverage can be achieved in young pre-adolescent girls, cost per vaccinated girl is

Subject(s)
Health Policy/economics , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Humans , Models, Economic , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vietnam/epidemiology
2.
Vaccine ; 25(33): 6257-70, 2007 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17606315

ABSTRACT

We use an empirically calibrated model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Brazil, a country with a high cervical cancer burden. Assuming 70% coverage, HPV 16, 18 vaccination of adolescent girls is expected to reduce the lifetime risk of cancer by approximately 42.7% (range, 33.2-53.5%); screening three times per lifetime is expected to reduce risk by 21.9-30.7% depending on the screening test, and a combined approach of vaccination and screening is expected to reduce cancer risk by a mean of 60.8% (range, 52.8-70.1%). In Brazil; provided the cost per vaccinated woman is less than I$ 25, implying a per dose cost of approximately I$ 5, vaccination before age 12, followed by screening three times per lifetime between ages 35 and 45, would be considered very cost-effective using the country's per capita gross domestic product as a cost-effectiveness threshold. Assuming a coverage rate of 70%, this strategy would be expected to prevent approximately 100,000 cases of invasive cervical cancer over a 5-year period. Vaccination strategies identified as cost-effective may be unaffordable in countries with similar socioeconomic profiles as Brazil without assistance; these results can provide guidance to the global community by identifying health investments of highest priority and with the greatest promise.


Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...