Spontaneous idiopathic pneumoperitoneum with acute abdomen.

Pneumoperitoneum is often caused by visceral perforation, and usually manifests with symptoms of peritonitis requiring surgical intervention. Non-surgical spontaneous pneumoperitoneum (ie. not associated with organ perforation) is a rare entity due to intrathoracic, intra-abdominal, gynecologic, iatrogenic or other reasons, and is usually treated conservatively. Idiopathic spontaneous pneumoperitoneum is even rarer than visceral perforation or other causes of free intra-abdominal air. In this report, we present a case of idiopathic spontaneous pneumoperitoneum. A seventy-five-year-old female patient presented with acute abdominal pain, low-grade fever, and nausea. Her abdominal examination findings were vague, and she did not have leukocytosis. Free intra-abdominal air was detected on plain X-ray, she was followed-up with cessation of oral intake, nasogastric tube, fluid resuscitation and prophylactic antibiotics for one day. There were no signs of acute abdomen except diffuse abdominal tenderness by deep palpation on the first day examination. There was a mild leukocytosis with a shift to the left in leukocytes, and pneumoperitoneum on abdominal X-ray. The abdominal computed tomography revealed free intra-abdominal air and minimal free fluid in Douglas pouch. Her past medical history revealed cholecystectomy (10 years ago) with no chronic diseases, regular medications, smoking, or alcohol consumption. The patient underwent emergency laparotomy. Despite lack of an identifiable cause and uncertainty of etiology, the patient was discharged on postoperative day 5. A thorough medical history, appropriate laboratory tests and radiological techniques and physical examination should be combined for identification of patients with non-surgical pneumoperitoneum, and avoid unnecessary laparotomy, while minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopy should be considered as part of evaluation.

General versus epidural anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy.

This study was a retrospective analysis of 850 lumbar microdiscectomy (LMD) under epidural anesthesia (EA; n=573) or general anesthesia (GA; n=277) performed by the same surgeon and paid by invoice to the Social Security Institution of the Turkish Republic between April 2003 and May 2013. Although GA is the most frequently used method of anesthesia during LMD, the choice of regional anesthetia (epidural, spinal or a combination of these) differs between surgeons and anesthetists. Studies have reported that EA in surgery for lumbar disc herniation may be more reliable than GA, as it enables the surgeon to communicate with the patient during surgery, but few studies have compared the costs of these two anesthetic methods in LMD. We found that EA patient costs were significantly lower than GA patient costs (p<0.01) and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the time spent in the operating room (p<0.01). There was no difference in the duration of surgery (p>0.05). The anesthetic method used during LMD affected the complication rate, cost and efficiency of operating room use. We suggest that EA is an anesthetic method that can contribute to health care cost savings and enable LMD to be completed with less nerve root manipulation and more comfort, efficacy, reliability and cost efficiency without affecting the success rate of the surgical procedure.

Cardiovasular changes after placement of a classic endotracheal tube, double-lumen tube, and Laryngeal Mask Airway.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare hemodynamic responses, P wave dispersion (Pd), and QT dispersion (QTd) after placement of a classic endotracheal tube (ETT), double-lumen tube (DLT), or Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Outpatient surgery center. PATIENTS: 75 adult, ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients undergoing cystoscopy and thoracoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to undergo placement of an ETT (Group T; n = 25), DLT (Group D; n = 25), or LMA (Group L; n = 25). Anesthesia was induced by etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.0 µg/kg, and maintained with nitrous oxide, oxygen, 2% to 3% sevoflurane, and rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg. MEASUREMENTS: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded immediately before intubation and after intubation at one, 3, 5, 10,15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after intubation/airway insertion. RESULTS: QT dispersion after tube placement was significantly higher than before tube placement in Group D (P = 0.0001) and Group L (P = 0.03). Mean arterial pressure and HR in Group T were significantly higher than in Group L at the first minute after tube placement (P = 0.02). Heart rate and MAP at baseline were significantly higher than the other measurement times in Groups T and D (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The LMA caused no change in Pd, HR, or MAP values during or after airway placement, but caused QTd after airway insertion. The ETT caused a sudden increase at the first minute after tube placement, without any Pd or QTd. In addition, DLT caused QTd without any serious change in hemodynamics.

Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine or thiopental decreases myoclonus after etomidate: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Myoclonic movements are common problems during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of pretreatment with dexmedetomidine (0.5 microg/kg) and thiopental (1 mg/kg) on the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus and postoperative pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective double-blind study was conducted at a university hospital. Ninety patients (ASA physical status I-II) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: patients were pretreated with either dexmedetomidine (0.5 microg/kg), thiopental (1 mg/kg), or saline before induction of anesthesia with etomidate. One minute after the injection of study drugs, etomidate, 0.3 mg/kg was given. Myoclonus was assessed on a scale of 0 to 3. Recovery time, postoperative pain score, and hemodynamic variables were recorded during the intraoperative and postoperative period. Headache, nausea, vomiting, and coughing were noted during the study. RESULTS: The incidence and the intensity of myoclonus was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine and thiopental groups (34%, 36%) than in the control group (64%) (P<0.05). The postoperative pain score at 30 min in the thiopental group was significantly higher than in the dexmedetomidine and control groups (63%) (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that pretreatment with dexmedetomidine or thiopental is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonic muscle movements and pretreatment with thiopental increases the postoperative pain.