Improving patient care through student leadership in team quality improvement projects.

In partnership with a major medical center, senior-level nursing students completed a root cause analysis and implementation plan to address a unit-specific quality issue. To evaluate the project, unit leaders were asked their perceptions of the value of the projects and impact on patient care, as well as to provide exemplars depicting how the student root cause analysis work resulted in improved patient outcome and/or unit processes. Liaisons noted benefits of having an RCA team, with positive impact on patient outcomes and care processes.

Stroke awareness among inpatient nursing staff at an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because 10% of strokes occur in hospitalized patients, we sought to evaluate stroke knowledge and predictors of stroke knowledge among inpatient and emergency department nursing staff. METHODS: Nursing staff completed an online stroke survey. The survey queried outcome expectations (the importance of rapid stroke identification), self-efficacy in recognizing stroke, and stroke knowledge (to name 3 stroke warning signs or symptoms). Adequate stroke knowledge was defined as the ability to name ≥2 stroke warning signs. Logistic regression was used to identify the association between stroke symptom knowledge and staff characteristics (education, clinical experience, and nursing unit), stroke self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. RESULTS: A total of 875 respondents (84% response rate) completed the survey and most of the respondents were nurses. More than 85% of respondents correctly reported ≥2 stroke warning signs or symptoms. Greater self-efficacy in identifying stroke symptoms (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.27) and higher ratings for the importance of rapid identification of stroke symptoms (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.51) were associated with stroke knowledge. Clinical experience, educational experience, nursing unit, and personal knowledge of a stroke patient were not associated with stroke knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke outcome expectations and self-efficacy are associated with stroke knowledge and should be included in nursing education about stroke.

Special considerations for mobilizing patients in the neurointensive care unit.

Patients with neurologic illness or injury benefit from early interventions to increase physical activity and mobility, but they also have special needs related to hemodynamic stability and intracranial pressure dynamics. After brain injury, moving paralyzed limbs--even passively--helps promote neural plasticity, "rerouting" signals around the injured area and forming new connections, resulting in improved functional recovery. Neurologic deficits may impede a patient's functional and language abilities, so a mobility program must take into account the need for assistive devices, communication strategies, and additional personnel. Because cerebral autoregulation may be impaired, stability of blood pressure and intracranial pressure must be considered when planning mobility activities. The clinical team must consider the full spectrum of mobility for the neuroscience patient, from having the bed in the chair position for a comatose patient to ambulation of the patient with ventriculostomy whose intracranial pressure will tolerate having drainage clamped for a short period of time. Those involved with mobility need to understand the patient's disease process, the implications of increasing activity levels, and the monitoring required during activity.

Implications of nurse-physician relations: report of a successful intervention.

Given the evidence linking medical errors to ineffective communication, strategies for improving communication among health care professionals must be implemented. The purpose of this article was to examine the effect of a collaborative intervention on improving communication patterns between nurses and physicians on two study units. The intervention consisted of two nurses and two physicians (per unit) meeting together (8 hours total) to collaboratively develop a solution to communication issues on their respective units. Physicians scored significantly higher on reports of openness of communication within groups, openness between groups, accuracy between groups, and collaboration between groups. Collaboration reported among nurses and physicians improved for both professions, with significance reached for physicians (p = 0.031). Strategies must be identified to break down the barriers set by the current culture, and that expedite the development of a team-centered culture supporting collaborative relations among health care professionals.

Risk of infection with prolonged ventricular catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between extended ventricular catheterization and infection remains controversial. Although studies have substantiated an increasing infection rate with prolonged catheterization, there has been less agreement on whether this trend continues beyond 10 days. Our study reviews the daily infection rate of 595 patients, 213 of whom underwent more than 10 days of catheterization. METHODS: All patients who underwent ventricular monitoring in the neurological intensive care unit from 1995 to 2003 at the University of Michigan Health System were reviewed retrospectively. Infection was defined as a positive cerebrospinal fluid culture. Life-table analysis was used to calculate daily hazard (infection) rates. Patient age, sex, diagnosis, catheter exchanges, location of patient during catheter insertion, and cerebrospinal fluid leak were evaluated as risk factors for infection. RESULTS: The average patient age was 51.3 years, and 51.3% were male. Duration of catheterization averaged 8.6 days. The overall infection rate was 8.6%. Daily infection rates increased from the onset of catheter insertion but reached a plateau after Day 4, with subsequent rates ranging predominantly between 1 and 2%, even with extended catheterization beyond 10 days. Only ventricular catheters that had been placed at other institutions significantly affected the infection rate. CONCLUSION: A relationship between duration of catheterization and infection seems to be present. However, this relationship is not linear. There is an extremely low daily infection rate that rises over the initial 4 days but then remains relatively constant even with prolonged catheter use. Clinical decisions to continue ventricular catheterization should reflect this low daily risk of infection, which does not seem to increase with extended catheter use.