Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Pediatrics ; 132(5): e1173-83, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24127466

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify prevalence and patterns of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among youth with recurrent headaches (HA) and evaluate associations with co-occurring health problems and limitations as well as with the use and expenditures for conventional medical care. METHODS: Variables were constructed for youth aged 10 to 17 by using linked data from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey and the 2008 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. Bivariate, logistic, and 2-part regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Of the 10.6% of youth experiencing HA, 29.6% used CAM, rising to 41% for the many HA sufferers who also experienced difficulties with emotions, concentration, behavior, school attendance, or daily activities. Biologically based products (16.2%) and mind-body therapies (13.3%) were most commonly used, especially by the 86.4% of youth with HA experiencing at least 1 other chronic condition. Compared with non-CAM users, youth with HA who used CAM also had higher expenditures for and use of most types of conventional care. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use is most common among youth with HA experiencing multiple chronic conditions and difficulties in daily functioning. Associations among CAM use, multiple chronic conditions, and higher use of conventional care highlight the need for medical providers to routinely ask about CAM use to meet the complex health needs of their patients and facilitate the optimal integration of care. Research is needed to identify models for coordinating complementary and conventional care within a medical home and to understand the health benefits or risks associated with CAM use in conjunction with conventional treatments for patients with HA.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Headache/psychology , Headache/therapy , Health Surveys , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys/methods , Humans , Male , Secondary Prevention
2.
J Pediatr ; 163(6): 1634-7, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23968749

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the variability in diagnostic testing and treatment of headaches in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with use of a nationally representative sample. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey during 2005-2009. To assess the use of evidence-based treatment, we analyzed all patients <18 years old in 2 groups: (1) primary discharge diagnosis of headache and (2) discharge diagnosis of migraine. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-eight sampled ED visits from 2005-2009 represented a national estimate of 1.7 million visits with a discharge diagnosis of headache. A total of 95 visits represented a national estimate of 340 000 visits with a discharge diagnosis of migraine. Median age was 13.1 years and 60% were female with a primary diagnosis of headache. In this group, neuroimaging was performed in 37% of patients and 39% underwent blood tests. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids were most commonly used for treatment. For children with a discharge diagnosis of migraine, approximately 40% of patients received non-evidence-based treatment, most commonly with opioid medications, and >20% of patients underwent computed tomography scanning. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in the evaluation and treatment of pediatric headache in the ED. Despite evidence-based clinical guidelines for migraine headache, a large number of children continue to receive opioids and ionizing radiation in the ED.


Subject(s)
Emergency Treatment , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 11(6): 643-52, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23581634

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Infantile and late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs) are invariably fatal lysosomal storage diseases associated with defects in lysosomal enzyme palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1 (PPT-1) or tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1) activity. Previous preclinical studies have demonstrated that human CNS stem cells (HuCNS-SCs) produce both PPT-1 and TPP1 and result in donor cell engraftment and reduced accumulation of storage material in the brain when tested in an NCL mouse model. METHODS: HuCNS-SC transplantation was tested in an open-label dose-escalation Phase I clinical trial as a potential treatment for infantile and late-infantile NCL. Study design included direct neurosurgical transplantation of allogeneic HuCNS-SCs into the cerebral hemispheres and lateral ventricles accompanied by 12 months of immunosuppression. RESULTS: Six children with either the infantile or late-infantile forms of NCL underwent low- (3 patients) and high- (3 patients) dose transplantation of HuCNS-SCs followed by immunosuppression. The surgery, immunosuppression, and cell transplantation were well tolerated. Adverse events following transplantation were consistent with the underlying disease, and none were directly attributed to the donor cells. Observations regarding efficacy of the intervention were limited by the enrollment criteria requiring that patients be in advanced stages of disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first-in-human clinical trial involving transplantation of a purified population of human neural stem cells for a neurodegenerative disorder. The feasibility of this approach and absence of transplantation-related serious adverse events support further exploration of HuCNS-SC transplantation as a potential treatment for select subtypes of NCL, and possibly for other neurodegenerative disorders.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Neural Stem Cells/transplantation , Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses/diagnosis , Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Mycophenolic Acid/administration & dosage , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Stereotaxic Techniques , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Tripeptidyl-Peptidase 1
4.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 28(12): 1293-6, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23187986

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Limited progress has been made in the past decade for abortive treatment of migraine headache in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Propofol, a general anesthetic, has been reported to be effective in the treatment of refractory headaches in adults at subanesthetic doses but never in the pediatric population. The goal of this study was to review our institution's experience with subanesthetic doses of propofol for the abortive treatment of pediatric migraine and compare propofol with standard abortive therapy in the PED. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients discharged from the Oregon Health and Science University PED with a diagnosis of migraine headache from January 2010 to July 2011. Patients treated with subanesthetic doses of propofol were compared with matched controls who received standard abortive migraine therapy, defined as the combined use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, diphenhydramine, and prochlorperazine. Outcome variables of interest included reduction of pain as measured on a self-reported visual analog scale and length of stay after administration of initial abortive medication. RESULTS: Patients who received subanesthetic doses of propofol achieved significantly greater reduction in pain scores (80.1% vs 61.1%; P < 0.05) compared with matched controls as well as shorter stay (122 minutes vs 203 minutes; P = 0.2) after treatment. No adverse effects (hypotension, respiratory depression, or hypoxia) were recorded in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol seems to be effective for the abortive treatment of pediatric migraine headache in the PED. Further prospective trials are warranted to either support or refute these initial findings.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Propofol/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Child , Diphenhydramine/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Evaluation , Female , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Pain Measurement , Prochlorperazine/therapeutic use , Propofol/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Pediatr Neurol ; 33(5): 314-6, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16243217

ABSTRACT

This study reports on the efficacy and safety of low-dose topiramate in the treatment of pediatric patients with chronic daily headache. Topiramate is one of the new antiepileptic drugs commonly being used for migraine prophylaxis in adults as well as children and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for migraine treatment in adults. This report presents our experience with low-dose topiramate for the treatment of chronic daily headache using a retrospective parental survey of 21 patients ranging in age from 6 to 18 years. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using a parental assessment and satisfaction questionnaire. Sixty-two percent of families reported that low-dose topiramate (average dose of 30 mg/day) was successful in reducing both the frequency and severity of headache episodes. The headache frequency decreased from 22.8 headaches/month to 7.2 headaches/month and severity decreased from a pain score of 8.1 to 3.7. Topiramate was safe, well tolerated, and highly effective at low doses in the treatment of chronic daily headaches.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Fructose/analogs & derivatives , Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Adolescent , Child , Female , Fructose/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Topiramate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...