Impact of Sarcopenic Obesity on Severe Postoperative Complications in Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have indicated that sarcopenia affects the short- and long-term outcomes of cancer patients, including those with gastric cancer. In recent years, sarcopenic obesity and its effects have been reported in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of sarcopenic obesity on postoperative complications in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included 155 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer from January 2015 to July 2021. Sarcopenia was defined by the psoas muscle index (<6.36 cm2/m2 in men and <3.92 cm2/m2 in women), which measures the iliopsoas muscle area at the lumbar L3 level using computed tomography. Obesity was defined by body mass index (≥25). Patients with both sarcopenia and obesity were defined as the sarcopenic obesity group and others as the non-sarcopenic obesity group. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo classification grade IIIa or higher. RESULTS: Of the 155 patients, 26 (16.8%) had sarcopenic obesity. The incidence of severe postoperative complications was significantly higher in the sarcopenic obesity group (30.8% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis indicated that sarcopenic obesity was an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications (odds ratio, 3.950; 95% confidence interval, 1.390-11.200; p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenic obesity is an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications.

Addition of docetaxel to S-1 results in significantly superior 5-year survival outcomes in Stage III gastric cancer: a final report of the JACCRO GC-07 study.

PURPOSE: A phase III trial comparing S-1 and docetaxel with S-1 alone as postoperative chemotherapy for pathologically Stage III gastric cancer was conducted and clarified the superiority of the doublet in terms of 3-year relapse-free survival as the primary endpoint (67.7% versus 57.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.715, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.587-0.871; p = 0.0008). This final report analyzed 5-year survival outcomes along with the incidence and pattern of late recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed Stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either S-1 plus docetaxel or S-1 alone. The same 912 patients who were evaluated for 3-year survival outcomes in the previous report were analyzed. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival rate of the S-1 plus docetaxel group (67.91%) was significantly superior to that in the S-1 group (60.27%; HR 0.752, 95% CI 0.613-0.922; p = 0.0059). The incidence of late recurrence at > 3 years after randomization was similar in both groups (7.3% versus 7.2%). Peritoneal dissemination was the most common pattern of late recurrence. Addition of docetaxel significantly suppressed relapse through the lymphatic (6.8% [95% CI 4.52-9.17] versus 15% [95% CI 11.76-18.30]; p < 0.0001) and hematogenous (10.2% [95% CI 7.37-12.94] versus 15.7% [95% CI 12.36-19.01]; p < 0.0137) pathways throughout the 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit of postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and docetaxel in terms of 5-year overall survival rate was confirmed for patients with pathologically Stage III gastric cancer, although late recurrences were not prevented.

Human epidermal growth factor 2 overexpressed alpha-fetoprotein-producing-gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the clinicopathological characteristics of α-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric carcinoma (AFP-GC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2 overexpression to extend the treatment strategy for AFP-GC. METHODS: We analyzed 41 patients with AFP-GC who underwent surgical resection or chemotherapy from 1989 to 2019, and who had over 20ng/mL of serum AFP or positive immunohistochemical AFP expression. HER2 expression status was investigated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all patients and by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for cases with an IHC score of 2+. AFP-GC with an IHC score of 3 + or 2 + and FISH positivity was defined as HER2 overexpressed AFP-GC. The correlation between HER2 status and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in AFP-GC was analyzed. RESULTS: HER2 overexpression was detected in 17.1% of AFP-GC patients. The prognosis of the patients with HER2 overexpressed AFP-GC was not significantly different compared to HER2 non-overexpressed AFP-GC. HER2 overexpressed AFP-GC consisted of heterogeneous histology with a higher proportion of mixed-type tumors (p = 0.002). The clinical outcome of AFP-GC with mixed-type of histology tended to be better than other intestinal or diffuse types (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: HER2 overexpressed AFP-GC consisted of a mixed type of histology, which showed a better prognosis. The results presented that HER2 status in AFP-GC is one of the molecular candidates to improve the prognosis.

A Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Schedule Modification for Nab-Paclitaxel in Combination with Ramucirumab for Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The B-RAX Trial (JACCRO GC-09).

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether schedule modification of bi-weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) plus ramucirumab (RAM) is efficacious against gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GJC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable GC or GJC who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens received nab-PTX (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and RAM (8 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Based on the incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) during the first cycle, patients were modified to bi-weekly therapy from the second cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the bi-weekly therapy population. Based on the hypothesis that bi-weekly nab-PTX plus RAM would improve PFS from 4.5 to 7.0 months, 40 patients were required for power of 0.8 with a one-sided α of 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients enrolled, 47 patients (58%) were assigned to bi-weekly therapy. Patient characteristics were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (19%) and diffuse type (45%). Median PFS was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-5.6 months) and overall response rate was 25% (95% CI 11-39%). Severe AEs of grade 3 or worse were mainly neutropenia (83%) and hypertension (23%). EQ-5D scores were maintained during the treatment. In patients who continued standard-schedule therapy, median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.8-4.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint for PFS was statistically not met, but modification of nab-PTX plus RAM to a bi-weekly schedule might be a feasible treatment option as second-line treatment for advanced GC/GJC patients, especially elderly patients, with severe AEs during the first cycle.

Phase II Study of S-1 and Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab as Second-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Resistant to the Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-cetuximab Regimen.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The usefulness of angiogenesis inhibitors as second-line treatment after the progression of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody drug-containing regimens for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to verify the efficacy and safety of the combination of S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (SIRB regimen) as second-line treatment for patients with oxaliplatin and cetuximab-refractory KRAS wild-type mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC who had previously received oxaliplatin and cetuximab-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Patients were infused with bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg and irinotecan 150 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, whereas S-1 80 mg/m2 was administered orally twice daily until day 15, followed by a 7-day drug holiday period. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. RESULTS: In total, 17 patients were enrolled in this study. The 6-month PFS rate was 64.7% [95% confidence interval (CI)=41.99-87.43], median PFS was 10.1 months (95%CI=4.11-17.28), and median overall survival was 21.8 months (95%CI=9.79-37.91). The response rate was 23.5% (95%CI=6.81-49.90%). Grade ≥3 adverse events were observed in 10% of patients, and included leukopenia [3 (17.6%)], neutropenia [5 (29.4%)], anorexia [2 (11.8%)], diarrhea [2 (11.8%)], and hypertension [3 (17.6%)]. No treatment-related deaths or febrile neutropenia were observed. CONCLUSION: The SIRB regimen might be a promising second-line treatment option for patients with oxaliplatin and cetuximab-refractory KRAS wild-type mCRC in terms of efficacy and safety.

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase I trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy for resectable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab monotherapy has demonstrated superior efficacy in advanced unresectable gastric cancer (GC), but its impact on resectable GC remains unknown. This phase I study aimed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy in resectable GC. METHODS: Untreated, resectable, cT2 or more advanced gastric adenocarcinomas with clinical stage I, II, or III were treated with two doses of nivolumab before gastrectomy. Patients were excluded if their tumors may be applicable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse event (AE) categories of special interest. RESULTS: All of the 31 enrolled patients completed 2 doses of nivolumab monotherapy. While 30 (97%) patients underwent surgery with curative intent, 1 patient discontinued before the planned surgical intervention because of a newly emerging liver metastasis. Seven patients (23%) had nivolumab treatment-related AEs, and one patient had a treatment-related AE of grade 3-4. The incidences of treatment-related AE categories of special interest ranged from 0 to 6%. Notable surgical complications included two cases of grade 3 anastomotic leakage and two cases of pancreatic fistula. The major pathologic response (MPR) assessed by the independent pathology review committee was achieved in five (16%) patients, of which one patient had a pathologic complete response. The MPR was mostly observed in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, high microsatellite instability, and/or high tumor mutation burden. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy is feasible with an acceptable safety profile and induces a MPR in certain patients with resectable GC. (Registration: clinicaltrials.jp, JapicCTI-183895).

Laparoscopic-assisted modified Kugel herniorrhaphy for obturator hernia: a case report.

Obturator hernia (OH) is a relatively rare disease and there are various surgical procedures for treating it. We report the case of a patient with an OH who underwent laparoscopic-assisted modified Kugel herniorrhaphy. The patient was a 74-year-old woman admitted to our hospital with nausea and abdominal distension. A diagnosis of intestinal obstruction was made because abdominal computed tomography revealed incarcerated right OH. No apparent strangulation findings were observed, and reduction was performed under ultrasound guidance. Laparoscopic-assisted modified Kugel herniorrhaphy for OH was performed. There were no signs of the bowel necrosis. Pneumoperitoneum was temporarily discontinued, and the OH was repaired by the modified Kugel herniorrhaphy. Laparoscopy confirmed that the direct Kugel patch was placed at the appropriate position. Laparoscopic-assisted modified Kugel herniorrhaphy is considered to be safe and useful for patients with OH and is considered as one of the treatment options.

Three-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel versus S-1 alone in stage III gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-07.

PURPOSE: The second planned interim analysis (median follow-up 12.5 months) in a phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer revealed significant improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) for S-1 plus docetaxel over S-1 alone. Although enrollment was terminated on the recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee, we continued follow-up and herein report on 3-year RFS, the primary endpoint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either S-1 plus docetaxel or S-1 alone. In the S-1 plus docetaxel group, S-1 was given orally for 2 weeks followed by 1 week of rest for seven courses, and docetaxel was given intravenously on day 1 of the second to seventh courses. The combination therapy was followed by S-1 monotherapy for up to 1 year. RESULTS: The 3-year RFS rate of the S-1 plus docetaxel group was 67.7%. This was significantly superior to that of 57.4% in the S-1 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.715, 95% CI 0.587-0.871, P = 0.0008). This translated into a significant benefit in the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate in the S-1 plus docetaxel group (77.7% versus 71.2%, HR 0.742, 95% CI 0.596-0.925, P = 0.0076). CONCLUSION: On 3-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 plus docetaxel was confirmed to improve both RFS and OS and can be recommended as a standard of care for patients with stage III gastric cancer treated by D2 dissection.

Phase 2 study of irinotecan plus cetuximab rechallenge as third-line treatment in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: JACCRO CC-08.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil as third-line treatment have limited efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: This Phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus cetuximab rechallenge as third-line treatment in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients who achieved clinical benefit with first-line cetuximab-containing therapy. The primary endpoint was 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. A sample size was calculated; 30 patients with a 3-month PFS rate of 45% deemed promising and 15% unacceptable. Patients with greater and less than the cut-off value of cetuximab-free intervals (CFIs) were classified into the long and short CFI groups, respectively, in subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Among 34 eligible patients who received treatment at least once, 3-month PFS rate was 44.1% (95% confidence interval, 27.4-60.8%). The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 and 8.2 months, respectively. The response and disease control rates were 2.9 and 55.9%, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly longer in the long- than in the short CFI group. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan plus cetuximab rechallenge as third-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC was safe and had promising activity, especially in those with a long CFI, warranting further investigation in a Phase 3 randomised trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000010638.

[A Case of Advanced Gastric Cancer with Bone Marrow Metastasis Treated with Low-Dose Combination Chemotherapy Containing S-1 and Docetaxel].

A 77-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with complaints of lumbago. Based on MRI, bone marrow biopsy, and upper endoscopy, she was diagnosed as having advanced gastric cancer accompanied by bone marrow metastasis and multiple bone metastases. She underwent combination chemotherapycontaining S-1 and docetaxel(TXT). However, during the first course of chemotherapy, she developed Grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis, and her ADL worsened. The anticancer agent doses were reduced drasticallyto 40% of the initial dose from the next course of chemotherapy. She was able to continue treatment without developing severe adverse events, and the disease did not progress for 11 months. However, during the 6 course of chemotherapy, she developed Grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis again, and it became difficult to continue treatment. Subsequent S-1 monotherapywas not efficacious, and she died 17 months after diagnosis. From the view of persistence and efficacy, we believe that low-dose combination chemotherapycontaining S-1 and TXT maybe a suitable regimen for advanced gastric cancer with bone marrow metastasis.

Addition of Docetaxel to Oral Fluoropyrimidine Improves Efficacy in Patients With Stage III Gastric Cancer: Interim Analysis of JACCRO GC-07, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: S-1 is a standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or III gastric cancer in Asia. Neoadjuvant or perioperative strategies dominate in Western countries, and docetaxel has recently shown significant survival benefits when combined with other standard regimens in advanced cancer and perioperative settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized phase III study was designed to prove the superiority of postoperative S-1 plus docetaxel over S-1 alone for R0 resection of pathologic stage III gastric cancer. The sample size of 1,100 patients was necessary to detect a 7% increase in 3-year relapse-free survival as the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.78; 2-sided α = .05; ß = .2). RESULTS: The second interim analysis was conducted when the number of events reached 216 among 915 enrolled patients (median follow-up, 12.5 months). Analysis demonstrated the superiority of S-1 plus docetaxel (66%) to S-1 (50%) for 3-year relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.632; 99.99% CI, 0.400 to 0.998; stratified log-rank test, P < .001), and enrollment was terminated as recommended by the independent data and safety monitoring committee. Incidences of grade 3 or greater adverse events, particularly neutropenia and leukopenia, were higher in the S-1 plus docetaxel group, but all events were manageable. CONCLUSION: Addition of docetaxel to S-1 is effective with few safety concerns in patients with stage III gastric cancer. The present findings may also be applicable in countries in which perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is not standard.

Tumor Sidedness and Enriched Gene Groups for Efficacy of First-line Cetuximab Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Molecular differences in tumor locations may contribute to the sidedness-specific response to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated genes associated with the response to cetuximab treatment depending on tumor sidedness. Our study included 77 patients with mCRC (13/63, right/left) with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors from phase II trials of first-line therapy with cetuximab. Expression levels of 2,551 genes were measured in tissue samples by HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel. Univariate Cox regression analysis using log2 values of counts per million (CPM) was conducted in each sidedness to assess associations with clinical outcomes, and to define the optimal cut-off point for clinically significant genes. In addition, a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify significant gene pathways in each sidedness. Sixty-nine patients were assessable for gene expression data. Overexpression of BECN1 [log2(CPM) ≥ 6.8] was associated with favorable survival, regardless of tumor sidedness. High expression of NOTCH1 [log2(CPM) ≥ 7.5] predicted significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; median 14.7 vs. 11.1 months, HR 0.43, P = 0.01) and overall survival (OS; median 42.8 vs. 26.5 months, HR 0.35, P = 0.01) in left side but not in right side. The GSEA showed that regulation of DNA replication gene set correlated with favorable survival in the left, whereas the subcellular component and leukocyte migration gene sets were associated with good survival in the right. In conclusion, genes contributing to the efficacy of cetuximab treatment may differ according to the sidedness in mCRC. NOTCH1 may potentially discriminate favorable responders to cetuximab in patients with left-sided tumors.

CEA Response and Depth of Response (DpR) to Predict Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Cetuximab Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level is faster and greater during cetuximab treatment than bevacizumab treatment and correlates with prolonged survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who receive cetuximab. OBJECTIVE: We investigated if the degree of change in the CEA value can serve as a diagnostic tool for predicting survival, as well as tumor regression in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab combined regimen as first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Associations among the CEA decrease, depth of response (DpR), and clinical outcomes were evaluated in 113 patients with mCRC from two phase II trials of first-line therapy: the JACCRO CC-05 trial of cetuximab plus FOLFOX and the CC-06 trial of cetuximab plus SOX. Analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. A 75% decrease in the CEA was used as the cut-off value to define the CEA response and discriminate CEA responders on the basis of the results of a previous study. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were eligible for analyses of both CEA and DpR. The median CEA decrease was 67.4%, and the median time to CEA nadir was 2.8 months, which was similar to the median time to DpR of 3.0 months. The DpR was associated with PFS and OS (rs = 0.56, P < 0.0001; rs = 0.39, P = 0.0090, respectively); moreover, the CEA decrease correlated with PFS (rs = 0.56, P < 0.0001), as well as OS (rs = 0.35, P = 0.019). CEA responders had significantly longer PFS (11.8 vs. 5.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, P = 0.0009) and slightly, but not significantly longer OS (36.2 vs. 23.5 months; HR 0.57; P = 0.072) than CEA non-responders. The CEA decrease was statistically significantly associated with the DpR (rs = 0.44, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that both DpR and CEA response correlate with clinical outcomes of first-line treatment with cetuximab. The CEA decrease may serve as a surrogate for DpR in patients who receive first-line cetuximab treatment (UMIN000004197, UMIN000007022).

Impact of nutritional status in the era of FOLFOX/FIRI-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The nutritional status plays a pivotal role during anticancer therapy. This study analyzed whether nutritional status influences the outcomes in the era of FOLFOX/FIRI therapy. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the nutritional status was well (serum albumin level ≥ 3.8 g/dL or a ≥ 1.0 g/dL increase as compared with the value before chemotherapy) or not before and 2 and 6 months after the start of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-related adverse events (AE), treatment effect, and compliance were evaluated according to the nutritional status. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed based on the nutritional status at 6 months. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2013, data on 108 consecutive patients were analyzed. At 2 months after chemotherapy, the hematotoxicic AE and the value of tumor markers did not differ significantly. The non-hematotoxic AE were less frequent in patients in the well-nourished group (grade 2, 15.9 vs. 38.5%, p < 0.01). Based on the nutritional status at 6 months after chemotherapy, the hematotoxicic AE (grade 3, 9 vs. 19.5%, p = 0.03) and non-hematotoxic AE (grade 2, 31.3 vs. 51.2%, p = 0.04; grade 3, 6.0 vs. 24.4%, p < 0.01) were less frequent, and the median CEA value (5.3 vs. 27.75 mg/L, p < 0.01) was significantly lower in the well-nourished group. The median PFS (364 vs. 233 days, p < 0.01) and 5-year OS (26.5 vs. 11.1%, p = 0.01) are significantly better in the well-nourished group. CONCLUSIONS: The well-nourished at initial 6 months may predict a better treatment response and fewer adverse events in FOLFOX/FIRI chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Stage II or III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The goal of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with Stage II or Stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2014, a total of 86 patients underwent surgical resection in conjunction with preoperative CRT for esophageal SCC in our Institute. RESULTS: A pathological complete response was achieved in 38.7% of patients with Stage II cancer and 20% of patients with Stage III. Postoperative complications were observed in 61.3% of Stage II and 76.4% of Stage III patients. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) was 83.2% in Stage II and 22.8% in Stage III (p=0.0001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 67.9% in Stage II and 29.9% in Stage III (p=0.0007). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CRT may improve OS and DFS rates in patients with Stage II esophageal SCC.

Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Versus Without Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical significance of preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in comparison with IMA ligation in surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal (colorectal) cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=862) with colorectal cancer who underwent intended surgical resection of the main tumor between 1986 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: IMA preserved (n=745) and IMA ligated (n=117). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in incidence of advanced stage III or IV disease between the 2 groups (P=0.56 and 0.51, respectively), whereas a longer operation time (287 [95 to 700] vs. 215 [60 to 900] min, respectively; P<0.001) and greater amount of intraoperative bleeding (595 [15 to 4530] vs. 235 [1 to 11565] mL, respectively; P<0.001) were observed in the IMA-ligated group. The overall incidence of surgery-related complications was higher in the IMA-ligated group than in the IMA-preserved group (53.0% vs. 38.5%, respectively; P=0.003). Urinary dysfunction and abdominal abscess were significantly more frequent in the IMA-ligated group (11.1% vs. 4.0%, P=0.001; and 6.8% vs. 2.6%, P=0.01, respectively), and postoperative hospitalization was longer (11 to 140, median 28 vs. 5 to 153, median 19 d, respectively; P<0.001). No significant difference was found in overall survival rate between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: For colorectal cancer resection, IMA preservation may be no change to IMA ligation as to patient' survival, with small risk of operative morbidity.

Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 and CDDP in Patients With Lymph Node Metastatic Stage II or III Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) comprising S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) followed by extensive resection in the management of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer with lymph node (LN) metastases. METHODS: Patients with LN metastases from stage II or III gastric cancer received S-1 and CDDP, as NAC criteria for LN metastases were the involvement of ≥4 nodes <2 cm or ≥1 nodes ≥2 cm as confirmed by a total body computed tomography scan. All patients underwent extensive resection including D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was complete resection rate and the secondary endpoints were 3-year relapse-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Fifty patients were assessable for the analysis. The complete resection rate was 87.8%. Three-year relapse-free survival was 44.9% and 3-year overall survival rate was 48.0%. CONCLUSIONS: NAC with S-1 and CDDP is safe and may improve the complete resection rate in patients with metastatic LN gastric cancer. This suggests that LN metastases would provide good target lesions in future clinical trials of NAC.

Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Clinical Outcomes of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab Plus Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Subgroup Analysis of the JACCRO CC-05/06 Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Primary tumor location is a critical prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, it remains unclear whether tumor location is a predictor of the response to cetuximab treatment. It is also uncertain if BRAF mutation contributes to the impact of tumor location on survival. We assessed the prognostic impact of tumor location on clinical outcomes in mCRC patients treated with first-line cetuximab chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The associations of tumor location with overall survival and progression-free survival were evaluated in mCRC patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors who were enrolled onto 2 clinical trials: JACCRO CC-05 of cetuximab plus FOLFOX (n = 57, UMIN000004197) and CC-06 of cetuximab plus SOX (n = 61, UMIN000007022). Tumors proximal or from splenic flexure to rectum were defined as right-sided or left-sided, respectively. In addition, exploratory RAS and BRAF mutation analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were assessable for tumor location; 90 had left-sided tumors. Left-sided tumors were significantly associated with longer overall survival (36.2 vs. 12.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.28, P < .0001) and progression-free survival (11.1 vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.47, P = .0041) than right-sided tumors; similar results were obtained in multivariate analysis. A subanalysis showed that the association was evident in the FOLFOX group and that tumor location was an independent prognostic factor irrespective of BRAF status in RAS wild-type patients. CONCLUSION: Primary tumor location might be a predictor of survival independent of BRAF status in mCRC patients who receive first-line cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Favorable Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with FOLFOX Plus Cetuximab (JACCRO CC-05).

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have found that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) are associated with favorable outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, few prospective studies have evaluated ETS and DpR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a phase II study of FOLFOX plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), chronological tumor shrinkage (evaluated every 8 weeks), and safety. The association of ETS and DpR with survival time was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: In 54 participants, the RR, median PFS, and OS were 66.7 % (95 % CI, 53.4-77.8 %), 11.1 months, and 33.9 months, respectively. There was no unexpected toxicity. Forty (80 %) of 50 assessable patients had ETS, which was associated with prolonged PFS and OS (11.3 vs. 3.7 months, HR 0.26, p = 0.0003; 42.8 vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.40, p = 0.0279, respectively). Median DpR was 56.3 %. The DpR correlated with OS (r s = 0.314, p = 0.027) as well as post-progression survival (PPS) (r s = 0.366, p = 0.017). Interestingly, DpR was moderately associated with OS and PPS (r s = 0.587, r s = 0.570, respectively) in patients harboring tumors with larger target lesions, but was not associated with OS or PPS in patients with smaller target lesions. FOLFOX plus cetuximab was active as a first-line treatment for Japanese mCRC patients, with no unexpected toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective evaluation of chronological tumor shrinkage showed that ETS and DpR correlate with outcomes in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who receive cetuximab-based chemotherapy (UMIN000004197).

Combined assessment of EGFR-related molecules to predict outcome of 1st-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Several studies have reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecules may serve as predictors of cetuximab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), such as EGFR gene copy number (GCN), expression of 2 ligands of EGFR, amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG), and EGFR CA simple sequence repeat 1 (CA-SSR1) polymorphism; however, these biomarkers still remain not useful in clinical practice since they have been evaluated using cohorts with patients treated in various settings of chemotherapy. We therefore analyzed associations of mRNA expression of AREG and EREG, EGFR GCN, and CA-SSR1 polymorphism [short (S;≤ 19) / long (L; ≥ 20)] with clinical outcomes in 77 Japanese patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC enrolled in phase II trials of FOLFOX (n = 28/57, UMIN000004197) or SOX (n = 49/67, UMIN000007022) plus cetuximab as first-line therapy. High AREG expression correlated with significantly better progression-free survival (median 11.6 vs. 66 months, HR 0.52, P = 0.037); moreover, it remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.48, P = 0.027). S/S genotype of CA-SSR1 predicted severe skin toxicity (P = 0.040). Patients with both AREG-low and EGFR low-GCN had significantly shorter overall survival than the others (median 22.2 vs. 42.8 months, HR 2.34, P = 0.042). The multivariate analysis showed that molecular status with both AREG-low and EGFR low-GCN was a predictor of worse survival (P = 0.006). In conclusion, AREG mRNA expression and EGFR CA-SSR1 polymorphism predict survival and skin toxicity, respectively, of initial chemotherapy with cetuximab. Our results also suggest potential prognostic value of the combined assessment of AREG and EGFR GCN for first-line cetuximab treatment.