[Recommendations for the specialist further training of nursing personnel on intensive care units in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a modified Delphi procedure with experts]. / Empfehlungen zur Fachweiterbildung von Pflegefachpersonen der Intensivstation bei der Behandlung des Bauchaortenaneurysmas: Ergebnisse eines modifizierten Delphi-Verfahrens mit Expert:innen.

INTRODUCTION: The medical development in the previous 15 years and the changes in treatment reality of the comprehensive elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms necessitate a re-evaluation of the quality assurance guidelines of the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (QBAA-RL). In the current version this requires a specialist further training quota for nursing personnel in intensive care wards of 50%. The quota was determined in 2008 based on expert opinions, although a direct empirical evidence base for this does not exist. METHODS: Representatives from the fields of patient representation, physicians, nursing personnel and other relevant interface areas were invited to participate in a modified Delphi procedure. Following a comprehensive narrative literature search, a survey and focus group discussions with national and international experts, a total of three anonymized online-based voting rounds were carried out for which previously determined key statements were assessed with a 4­point Likert scale (totally disagree up to totally agree). In addition, the expert panel had also defined a recommendation for a minimum quota for the specialist training of nursing personnel on intensive care wards in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, whereby an a priori agreement of 80% of the participants was defined as the consensus limit. RESULTS: Overall, 37 experts participated in the discussions and three successive voting rounds (participation rate 89%). The panel confirmed the necessity of a re-evaluation of the guideline recommendations and recommended the introduction of a shift-related minimum quota of 30% of the full-time equivalent of nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the introduction of structured promotional programs for long-term elevation of the quota. CONCLUSION: In this national Delphi procedure with medical and nursing experts as well as representatives of patients, the fundamental benefits and needs of professional specialist qualifications in the field of intensive care medicine were confirmed. The corresponding minimum quota for specialist further training of intensive care nursing personnel should generally apply without limitations to specific groups. The expert panel stipulates a shift-related minimum quota for intensive care nursing personnel with specialist training of 30% of the nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the obligatory introduction of structured and transparent promotion programs for the long-term enhancement.

A patient with lower gastrointestinal bleeding: common history, very uncommon cause, minimally invasive treatment.

An 81-year-old patient with significant cardiac comorbidities, a history of sigmoid resection 6 years ago, and iliac bypass surgery 19 years ago presented with mild hematochezia for the previous 3 days. While hemodynamically stable at first, he developed massive bleeding during preparation for colonoscopy and underwent a short course of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Colonoscopy revealed no active bleeding but a protuberance of the colonic wall and a coagulation clot. In ultrasonography immediately after endoscopy, a large aneurysm was diagnosed and diagnosis of an iliaco-colonic fistula was assumed. CT scan demonstrated a large pseudoaneurysm of the distal anastomosis after iliaco-iliac bypass. With endovascular treatment, the original lumen of the iliac artery could be recanalized, and 2 covered stents were placed to cover both anastomosis of the prosthetic bypass leading to a complete shutdown of bypass perfusion. A double-barreled transversostoma was established to minimize contamination of the aneurysmal sac. Seven months after these procedures, the patient is well and free of infection.Though aorto- or iliaco-colonic fistula after aortic or iliac surgery are very rare, endoscopists should be aware of their possibility. A high index of clinical suspicion in patients with prior abdominal vascular bypass surgery should prompt rapid imaging studies, possibly before endoscopy. In critically ill patients, endovascular treatment may be a suitable alternative and result in a favorable outcome.

Axillary-axillary interarterial chest loop conduit as an alternative for chronic hemodialysis access.

OBJECTIVE: After exhaustion of all conventional arteriovenous (AV) access options, an alternative approach is an arterioarterial conduit. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of an axillary-axillary (AA) interarterial (IA) access in this subset of patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent placement of an AA IA access. Patients were observed for functional aspects and complications. Outcomes were determined according to the Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery standards for reports for dealing with AV accesses. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age, 59 years; range, 41-82 years) underwent AA IA access placement under general anesthesia between May 2001 and December 2004. Exhausted upper extremity AV access options were found in 14 patients (70%), with central vein occlusion in 5 patients (25%), and 12 patients (60%) had ischemia from steal syndrome. High-output cardiac failure was present in one patient. Median follow-up was 7.4 months (range, 0.5-45.3 months). The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 5%. There was one (5%) early access thrombosis that resulted in moderate ischemia. Late access thrombosis occurred in three patients (15%), and all cases were asymptomatic. Early postoperative bleeding necessitated surgical intervention in four patients (20%). Late graft infection (n = 1; 5%) occurred after repeated thrombectomy. The primary and secondary patency rate was 90% and 93%, respectively, at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This short-term initial study showed that the AA IA loop access could be implanted with acceptable perioperative morbidity and with an excellent secondary patency rate. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the long-term complication rate and to allow more reasonable comparison with other methods of access.