Study of a Conical Plasma Jet with a Cloth-Covered Nozzle for Polymer Treatment.

Although atmospheric pressure plasma jets (APPJs) have been widely employed for materials modification, they have some drawbacks, such as the small treatment area (couple of cm2). To overcome this limitation, a funnel-like APPJ with a wide exit has been proposed. In this work, a gas-permeable cotton cloth covered the nozzle of the device to improve the gas flow dynamics and increase its range of operation. The funnel jet was flushed with Ar, and the plasma was ignited in a wide range of gas flow rates and the gap distances between the exit nozzle and the sample holder. The device characterization included electric measurements and optical emission spectroscopy (OES). To evaluate the size of the treatment and the degree of surface modification, large samples of high-density polyethylene (PE) were exposed to plasma for 5 min. Afterward, the samples were analyzed via water contact angle WCA measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that surface modification occurs simultaneously on the top and bottom faces of the samples. However, the treatment incorporated different functional groups on each side.

Simultaneous Treatment of Both Sides of the Polymer with a Conical-Shaped Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet.

A conical-shaped atmospheric pressure plasma jet (CS-APPJ) was developed to overcome a standard limitation of APPJs, which is their small treatment area. The CS-APPJs increase the treatment area but use the same gas flow. In the present work, polypropylene samples were treated by CS-APPJ and characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), the contact angle, Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was observed that the treatment co-occurs on the face directly in contact with the plasma and on the opposite face (OF) of the samples, i.e., no contact. However, the treatment changed the chemical composition on each side; the OF is rougher than the direct contact face (DCF), probably due to the oxygen groups in excess at the DCF and nitrogen in quantity at the OF. Although simultaneous treatment of both sides of the sample occurs for most atmospheric plasma treatments, this phenomenon is not explored in the literature.