Continuous intra-gastral monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill children: a validation study.

BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, detection of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH > 10 mmHg) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS = IAH + organ dysfunction) is paramount and usually monitored through intra-vesical pressures (IVP) as current standard. IVP, however, carries important disadvantages, being time-consuming, discontinuous, with infection risk through observer-dependent manipulation, and ill-defined for catheter sizes. Therefore, we sought to validate air-capsule-based measurement of intra-gastric pressure (ACM-IGP). METHODS: We prospectively compared ACM-IGP with IVP both in vivo and in vitro (water column), according to Abdominal-Compartment-Society validation criteria. We controlled for patient age, admission diagnosis, gastric filling/propulsive medication, respiratory status, sedation levels and transurethral catheters, all influencing intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). RESULTS: In tertiary care PICU setting, finally, n = 97 children were enrolled (median age, 1.3 years [range 0 days-17 years], LOS-PICU 8.0 [1-332] days, PRISM-III-Score 13 [0-35]). In n = 2.770 measurements pairs, median IAP was 6.7 [0.9-23.0] mmHg, n = 38 (39%) children suffered from IAH > 10 mmHg, n = 4 from ACS. In vitro against water column, ACM-IGP correlated perfectly (r2 0.99, mean bias - 0.1 ± 0.5 mmHg, limits of agreement (LOA) - 1.1/+ 0.9, percentage error [PE] 12%) as compared with IVP (r2 0.98, bias + 0.7 ± 0.6 mmHg, LOA - 0.5/+ 1.9, PE 15%). With larger IVP catheters at higher pressure levels, IVP underestimated pressures against water column. In vivo, agreement between either technique was strong (r2 0.95, bias 0.3 ± 0.8 mmHg, LOA - 1.3/+ 1.9 mmHg, PE 23%). No impact of predefined control variables on measurement agreement was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a large PICU population with high IAH prevalence, ACM-IGP agreed favourably with IVP. More widespread usage of ACM-IGP may improve detection rates of ACS in critically ill children. Trial registration WHO-ICTRP-No. DRKS00006556 (German Clinical Trial Register). Registered 12th September 2014, URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00006556.

Back to the roots? Dual cannulation strategy for ambulatory ECMO in adolescent lung transplant candidates: An alternative?

Bridging critically ill pediatric patients to lung transplantation still remains a major challenge. Although still controversial, within the last 5 years, ECMO has been increasingly used as a bridge to lung transplantation concept in adult and pediatric patients with acceptable outcomes. The outstanding developments in the field of extracorporeal devices and the introduction of awake ECMO concepts with the avoidance of mechanical ventilation have led to a real paradigm shift in the ICU management of pretransplant candidates with severe respiratory failure. Therefore, ECMO is no longer seen as a contraindication for lung transplantation at least at our center. Nevertheless, how to bridge these patients on ECMO still remains controversial. Thus, we introduced an ambulatory ECMO approach in adolescent lung transplant candidates with acute respiratory failure using a dual cannulation strategy and hereby present first results from this procedure.

Minimal invasive lung support via umbilical vein with a double-lumen cannula in a neonatal lamb model: a proof of principle.

PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome, with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) remains a major cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Although venovenous extracorporeal lung support (VV-ECLS) has become a standard of care procedure in neonatal patients with acute pulmonary failure there are no reports regarding the use of a double-lumen cannula for extracorporeal minimal invasive lung support via the umbilical vein. METHODS: A neonatal lamb model was used (n = 3). Umbilical vein was cannulated with a double-lumen catheter allowing venovenous extracorporeal gas exchange. Cannula was positioned with its tip in the right atrium. VV-ECLS was started and ventilation was stopped. Providing oxygenation and CO2 removal solely through VV-ECLS hemodynamics, blood gases were measured. RESULTS: Total VV-ECLS without MV was applied to all three neonatal lambs. Time on venovenous ECLS was 60, 120 and 120 min. Initial pCO2 was 60, 56 and 65 mmHg compared to 31, 32 and 32 mmHg at the end of VV-ECLS. Initial pO2 was 30, 27 and 26 mmHg compared to 22, 19 and 23 mmHg. Initial lactate was 5, 10 and 3.7 mmol/l compared to 13.3, 12.6 and 11.3 mmol/l at the end of VV-ECLS. MAP at baseline was 51, 52 and 65 mmHg compared to 36, 38 and 41 mmHg at the end of VV-ECLS. In all three lambs inotropes were admitted to maintain MAD >35 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Even without mechanical ventilation we were able to sufficiently remove pCO2 with our new minimal invasive VV-ECLS using a double-lumen catheter via the umbilical vein, supporting the idea of a lung protective strategy in neonatal acute respiratory failure. pO2 was measured 22, 19 and 23 mmHg, respectively, at the end of VV-ECLS, at least partially caused by recirculation phenomenon, which could possibly be improved by different cannula design. Inotropic support was necessary during VV-ECLS to achieve targeted MAD > 35 mmHg. While technically feasible, this new approach might allow further research in the field of extracorporeal lung support and therefore will follow the concept of a lung protective strategy in acute neonatal respiratory failure.

"Awake Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation" in Pediatric Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Experience.

In pediatric patients with acute refractory cardiogenic shock (CS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains an established procedure to maintain adequate organ perfusion. In this context, ECMO can be used as a bridging procedure to recovery, VAD or transplantation. While being supported by ECMO, most centers tend to keep their patients well sedated and supported by invasive ventilation. This may be associated with an increased risk of therapy-related morbidity and mortality. In order to optimize clinical management in pediatric patients with ECMO therapy, we report our strategy of veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) in extubated awake and conscious patients. We therefore present data of six of our patients with CS, who were treated by ECMO being awake without continuous analgosedation and invasive ventilation. Of these six patients, four were <1 year and two >14 years of age. Median time on ECMO was 17.4 days (range 6.9-94.2 days). Median time extubated, while receiving ECMO support was 9.5 days. Mean time extubated was 78 % of the total time on ECMO. Three patients reached full recovery of cardiac function on "Awake-VA-ECMO," whereas the other three were successfully bridged to destination therapy (VAD, heart transplantation, withdrawal). Four out of our six patients are still alive. Complications related to ECMO therapy (i.e., severe bleeding, site infection or dislocation of cannulas) were not observed. We conclude that "Awake-VA-ECMO" in extubated, spontaneously breathing conscious pediatric patients is feasible and safe for the treatment of acute CS and can be used as a "bridging therapy" to recovery, VAD implantation or transplantation.

Concept of "awake venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation" in pediatric patients awaiting lung transplantation.

In patients awaiting LuTx, MV and ECMO are often the last ways to create a bridge to LuTx. Both interventions are associated with a poor posttransplant outcome and survival rate. To improve the results of these patients, new "bridging-strategies" are necessary. Recent reports demonstrate promising results for the concept of "awake ECMO" in adult patients. To date, no data on this approach in pediatric patients have been available. We therefore describe the use of VV-ECMO as a treatment strategy for RF in awake pediatric patients. It presents our experiences with the first three children treated using this new concept. Mean amount of time on ECMO was 44 days (range, 11.5-109 days). Two patients were successfully bridged to their LuTx. Both are still alive without any recurrences (24 and three months following LuTx). One patient died before a further LuTx after 109 days on ECMO due to adenoviral infection. Although reintubation was necessary in two patients, and total time being awake while on ECMO was <50%, we conclude that the concept of "awake VV-ECMO" is feasible for the treatment of RF and can be used as a "bridging therapy" to LuTx.