Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Transplant Proc ; 43(5): 2059-62, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21693325

ABSTRACT

Intracardiac thrombus formation usually occurs in the left-sided cavities of the heart, most frequently in the presence of atrial fibrillation or cardiomyopathy. We report the case of an initially unclear mass developing in the right atrium (RA) of a heart transplant recipient, which was subsequently resected via a minimally invasive surgical approach. Access via right anterior minithoracotomy using videoscopic assistance allowed for uncomplicated RA thrombectomy in the presented case, avoiding reentry sternotomy with the potential risk of cardiac injury and without aortic cross-clamping or cardioplegic arrest. The patient is doing fine with excellent graft function at the latest follow-up 4 months after minimally invasive thrombectomy and 30 months after cardiac transplantation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing minimally invasive resection of a right atrial thrombus in a heart transplant recipient.


Subject(s)
Heart Atria/pathology , Heart Transplantation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Thrombosis/surgery , Humans
3.
Lab Invest ; 81(4): 535-41, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11304573

ABSTRACT

Immunohistochemical expression analysis of mismatch repair gene products has been suggested for the prediction of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) carrier status in cancer families and the selection of microsatellite instability (MSI)-positive tumors in sporadic colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate hMSH2 and hMLH1 immunohistochemistry in familial and sporadic colorectal cancer. We found that immunohistochemistry allowed us to identify patients with germline mutations in hMSH2 and many cases with germline mutations in hMLH1. However, some missense and truncating mutations may be missed. In addition, hMLH1 promoter methylation, commonly occurring in familial and sporadic MSI-positive colorectal cancer, can complicate the interpretation of immunohistochemical expression analyses. Our results suggest that immunohistochemistry cannot replace testing for MSI to predict HNPCC carrier status or identify MSI-positive sporadic colorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins , Microsatellite Repeats , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Carrier Proteins , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/metabolism , DNA Methylation , DNA, Neoplasm/chemistry , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , MutS Homolog 2 Protein , Neoplasm Proteins/biosynthesis , Neoplasm Proteins/immunology , Nuclear Proteins , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/biosynthesis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/immunology , Tumor Cells, Cultured
4.
Cancer Res ; 57(21): 4739-43, 1997 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9354434

ABSTRACT

The molecular biology section of the Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer study group-Germany, instituted a multicenter study to test the reliability and quality of microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. Eight laboratories compared MSI analyses performed on 10 matched pairs of normal and tumor DNA from patients with colorectal carcinomas. A variety of techniques were applied to the detection of microsatellite changes: (a) silver and ethidium bromide staining of polyacrylamide gels; (b) radioactive labeling; and (c) automated fluorescence detection. The identification of highly unstable tumors and tumors without MSI was achieved in high concordance. However, the interpretation of the band patterns resulted in divergent classifications at several microsatellite marker loci for a large fraction of this tumor/normal panel. The data on more than 30 primers per case suggest that the enlargement of the microsatellite panel to more than 10 loci does not influence the results. In this study, cases with MSI in less than 10% of loci were classified as microsatellite stable, whereas MSI was diagnosed in cases with more than 40% of all markers unstable. We propose that a panel of five microsatellite loci consisting of repeats with different lengths should be analyzed in an initial analysis. When less than two marker loci display shifts in the microsatellite bands from tumor DNA, the panel should be enlarged to include an additional set of five marker loci. The number of marker loci analyzed as well as the number of unstable marker loci found should always be identified. These criteria should result in reports of MSI that are more comparable between studies.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Chromosome Deletion , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Colorectal Neoplasms/classification , Genetic Techniques/standards , Humans , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...