Llama-derived single domain antibodies to build multivalent, superpotent and broadened neutralizing anti-viral molecules.

For efficient prevention of viral infections and cross protection, simultaneous targeting of multiple viral epitopes is a powerful strategy. Llama heavy chain antibody fragments (VHH) against the trimeric envelope proteins of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (Fusion protein), Rabies virus (Glycoprotein) and H5N1 Influenza (Hemagglutinin 5) were selected from llama derived immune libraries by phage display. Neutralizing VHH recognizing different epitopes in the receptor binding sites on the spikes with affinities in the low nanomolar range were identified for all the three viruses by viral neutralization assays. By fusion of VHH with variable linker lengths, multimeric constructs were made that improved neutralization potencies up to 4,000-fold for RSV, 1,500-fold for Rabies virus and 75-fold for Influenza H5N1. The potencies of the VHH constructs were similar or better than best performing monoclonal antibodies. The cross protection capacity against different viral strains was also improved for all three viruses, both by multivalent (two or three identical VHH) and biparatopic (two different VHH) constructs. By combining a VHH neutralizing RSV subtype A, but not subtype B with a poorly neutralizing VHH with high affinity for subtype B, a biparatopic construct was made with low nanomolar neutralizing potency against both subtypes. Trivalent anti-H5N1 VHH neutralized both Influenza H5N1 clade1 and 2 in a pseudotype assay and was very potent in neutralizing the NIBRG-14 Influenza H5N1 strain with IC(50) of 9 picomolar. Bivalent and biparatopic constructs against Rabies virus cross neutralized both 10 different Genotype 1 strains and Genotype 5.The results show that multimerization of VHH fragments targeting multiple epitopes on a viral trimeric spike protein is a powerful tool for anti-viral therapy to achieve "best-in-class" and broader neutralization capacity.

Differential cell viability of chondrocytes and progenitor cells in tissue-engineered constructs following implantation into osteochondral defects.

Animal studies in cartilage tissue engineering usually include the transfer of cultured cells into chondral or osteochondral defects. Immediately at implantation, the cells are exposed to a dramatically changed environment. The aim of this study was to determine the viability of two cell types currently considered for cellular therapies of cartilage defects-chondrocytes and progenitor cells-shortly after exposure to an osteochondral defect in rabbit knees. To that end, autogenic chondrocytes and periosteal cells were labeled with CM-DiI fluorochrome, seeded or cultured in PEGT/PBT scaffolds for periods up to 2 weeks, transferred into osteochondral defects, harvested 5 days postimplantation, and analyzed for cell viability. In order to further elucidate factors effecting cell viability within our model system, we investigated the effect of serum, 2) extracellular matrix surrounding implanted cells, 3) scaffold interconnectivity, and 4) hyaluronan, as a known cell protectant. Controls included scaffolds with devitalized cells and scaffolds analyzed at implantation. We found that the viability of periosteum cells (14%), but not of chondrocytes (65-95%), was significantly decreased after implantation. The addition of hyaluronan increased periostium cell viability to 44% (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, cell viability in less interconnected compression-molded scaffolds was higher compared to that of fully interconnected scaffolds produced by rapid prototyping. All other factors tested did not affect viability significantly. Our data suggest chondrocytes as a suitable cell source for cartilage repair in line with clinical data on several chondrocyte-based therapies. Although we did not test progenitor cells other the periosteum cells, tissue-engineering approaches using such cell types should take cell viability aspects into consideration.