Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Psychiatry ; 24(11): 1576-1582, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31164699

ABSTRACT

The Genomics Workgroup of the National Advisory Mental Health Council (NAMHC) recently issued a set of recommendations for advancing the NIMH psychiatric genetics research program and prioritizing subsequent follow-up studies. The report emphasized the primacy of rigorous statistical support from properly designed, well-powered studies for pursuing genetic variants robustly associated with disease. Here we discuss the major points NIMH program staff consider when assessing research applications based on common and rare variants, as well as genetic syndromes, associated with psychiatric disorders. These are broad guiding principles for investigators to consider prior to submission of their applications. NIMH staff weigh these points in the context of reviewer comments, the existing literature, and current investments in related projects. Following the recommendations of the NAMHC, statistical strength and robustness of the underlying genetic discovery weighs heavily in our funding considerations as does the suitability of the proposed experimental approach. We specifically address our evaluation of applications motivated in whole, or in part, by an association between human DNA sequence variation and a disease or trait relevant to the mission of the NIMH.


Subject(s)
Genomics/trends , Mental Disorders/genetics , Mental Health/trends , Humans , National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) , United States
2.
J Med Ethics ; 44(9): 643-645, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29903854

ABSTRACT

The active debate about the return of incidental or secondary findings in research has primarily focused on return to research participants, or in some cases, family members. Particular attention has been paid to return of genomic findings. Yet, research may generate other types of findings that warrant consideration for return, including findings related to the pathology of donated biospecimens. In the case of deceased biospecimen donors who are also organ and/or tissue transplant donors, pathology incidental findings may be relevant not to family members, but to potential organ or tissue transplant recipients. This paper will describe the ethical implications of pathology incidental findings in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, the process for developing a consensus approach as to if/when such findings should be returned, possible implications for other research projects collecting postmortem tissues and how the scenario encountered in GTEx fits into the larger return of results/incidental findings debate.


Subject(s)
Disclosure/ethics , Genomics/ethics , Incidental Findings , Pathology/ethics , Transplant Recipients , Confidentiality/ethics , Humans
3.
Genome Biol ; 8(5): 212, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17521453

ABSTRACT

The completion of the Allen Brain Atlas generated a great deal of press interest and enthusiasm from the research community. What does it do, and what other complementary resources increase its functionality?


Subject(s)
Brain , Databases, Genetic , Gene Expression , Mice/genetics , Animals , Gene Expression Profiling
4.
Biol Psychiatry ; 52(6): 503-28, 2002 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12361666

ABSTRACT

Approximately one half-century ago several classes of medications, discovered by serendipity, were introduced for the treatment of depression and bipolar disorder. These highly effective medications revolutionized our approach to mood disorders and helped launch the modern era of psychiatry. Yet our progress since those serendipitous discoveries has been disappointing. We still do not understand with certainty how those medications produce their desired clinical effects. We have not introduced newer medications with fundamentally different mechanisms of action than the older agents. We have not identified the genetic and neurobiological mechanisms underlying depression and mania, nor do we understand the mechanisms by which nongenetic factors influence these disorders. We have only a rudimentary understanding of the circuits in the brain responsible for the normal regulation of mood and affect, and of those circuits that function abnormally in mood disorders. In approaching these gaps in our knowledge, this workgroup highlighted four major areas for future investment. These include developing better animal models of mood disorders; identifying genetic determinants of normal and abnormal mood in humans and animals; discovering novel targets and biomarkers of mood disorders and treatments; and increasing the recruitment of investigators from diverse backgrounds to mood disorders research.


Subject(s)
Mood Disorders , Research/trends , Animals , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Behavior Control , Behavior, Animal , Biomarkers , Brain/metabolism , Brain/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/genetics , Depressive Disorder/metabolism , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Disease Models, Animal , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Mood Disorders/genetics , Mood Disorders/metabolism , Mood Disorders/psychology , National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) , Receptors, Neurotransmitter/metabolism , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...