Implementing a screening algorithm for early recognition of sepsis in hospitalized children: a quality improvement project.

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in children. Utilizing a screening tool for early recognition of sepsis is recommended. Our centre had no screening tool for sepsis nor a standardized protocol for sepsis management. In December 2020, a screening algorithm for sepsis was implemented. The algorithm consisted of vital signs measurements in children with an abnormal body temperature, a pop-up alert, nurse's and physician's evaluation, and activation of a workup protocol. The project's primary aim was to increase vital signs measurement rates in hospitalized children with abnormal body temperature from 40% to >90% within 6 months, by 1 June 2021, and sustain until 31 December 2021. Adherence to the algorithm and performance were monitored during 2021, and the outcomes were compared to the preceding 5 years and a control ward. The alert identified 324 children and 596 febrile episodes. Vital signs measurement adherence increased from 42.7% to >90% in 2 months. A nurse evaluated 86.4% of episodes, and a physician evaluated 83.0% of these. Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission rates were lower in the intervention period vs. the pre-intervention period vs. the control ward (4.6% vs. 5.6% vs. 6.0%, respectively); the median PICU length of stay was shorter in the intervention vs. the control ward [2.0 (IQR 1, 4) vs. 5.5 (IQR 2, 7), respectively]. These differences were not statistically significant. During the intervention period, the adherence to vital signs measurements reached the goal of >90%. The alert system prompted an evaluation by caregivers and management according to the protocol. Further monitoring is needed to improve outcomes.

The impact of medical clowns exposure over postoperative pain and anxiety in children and caregivers: An Israeli experience.

While postoperative pain management was shown to reduce unwanted physiological and emotional outcomes, pediatric postoperative pain management remains suboptimal. Medical-clowns were shown to be beneficial in many medical contexts including reduction of stress, anxiety and pain. This study was set to assess the effectiveness of medical-clowns on pediatric postoperative pain reduction. Children age 4 or above, planned for elective hernia repair surgery were recruited. Children were randomly divided to a control or medicalclown escorted groups. Demographical and clinical data were collected using questionnaires and electronic sheets. Children escorted by clowns reported lower levels of pain upon admittance, discharge and 12- hours post-surgery. Statistically significant reduction of parental distress and significantly higher serum cortisol levels were observed in the clown-therapy group. Although small, our study supports the possibility that preoperative medical-clown therapy might be a cheap, safe and yet beneficial method for postoperative pain reduction.

Quantifying the Mortality Impact of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the ICU.

OBJECTIVES: We quantified the 28-day mortality effect of preexisting do-not-resuscitate orders in ICUs. DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective study of patients admitted to five ICUs at a tertiary university medical center (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, BIDMC, Boston, MA) between 2001 and 2008. INTERVENTION: None. PATIENTS: Two cohorts were defined: patients with do not resuscitate advance directives on day 1 of ICU admission and a control group comprising patients with no limitations of level of care on ICU day 1 (full code). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was mortality at 28 days after ICU admission. Of 19,007 ICU patients, 1,239 patients (6.5%) had a do-not-resuscitate order on the first day of ICU admission and survived 48 hours in the ICU. We matched those do-not-resuscitate patients with 2,402 patients with full-code status. Twenty-eight day and 1-year mortality were both significantly higher in the do-not-resuscitate group (33.9% vs 18.4% and 60.7% vs 40.2%; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Do-not-resuscitate status is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. This may reflect severity of illness not captured by other clinical factors, but the perceptions of the treating team related to do-not-resuscitate status could also be causally responsible for increased mortality in patients with do-not-resuscitate status.

Seasonal changes in serum calcium, PTH and vitamin D levels in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, PTH and calcium levels are not well characterized in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Our objectives were to characterize seasonal changes in these parameters in PHPT patients, and to assess whether these seasonal changes affect clinical decision making. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on the electronic medical records of Clalit Health service in the south of Israel between 2000 and 2012. Patients 18years and older with PHPT (PTH>upper limit of norm (ULN) and serum calcium>10.5mg%) were included. Patients with renal failure or on Thiazide diuretics were excluded. All serum levels of calcium, PTH and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were collected and then stratified according to season. RESULTS: 792 patients were classified as PHPT (72.2% female) and had a total of 2659 PTH tests, 1395 25-hydroxyvitamin D tests and 7426 calcium test. Fifty six percent of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were <50nmol/L. Seasonality was demonstrated in all three parameters: mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 13% higher in the summer compared to the winter (P<0.001), median PTH values showed opposite trend with a fall of about 8.4% in summer compared to winter (P<0.001). Calcium levels were higher during the autumn with a rise of about 0.2mg/dL in the mean calcium levels compared to spring and summer (P<0.001). The odds ratio of calcium level above 11.5mg/dL is highest in the autumn (OR=1.275, P=0.018). CONCLUSION: We show seasonal variation in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, PTH, and calcium levels in patients with PHPT. These seasonal variations cause transition to pathological values that may influence diagnosis and treatment of PHPT patients.

The Utility of Inflammatory and Endothelial Markers to Identify Infection in Emergency Department Patients.

BACKGROUND: Identifying infection in emergency department (ED) patients can be challenging. This study assesses the value that inflammatory and endothelial biomarkers add to clinical data when predicting infectious etiologies of abnormal vital signs (AVSs) in ED patients. METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational cohort study of ED patients with AVSs at an urban, academic tertiary-care hospital, identified from March 1, 2013, to April 15, 2013. Collected blood samples were assayed for soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, interleukin 6, sFlt-1, and procalcitonin. History and physical examination were abstracted from the ED documentation. The primary outcome, infectious etiology, was adjudicated by review of the hospital documentation. Three multivariate logistic regression models predicting infection were created using clinical data, biomarkers, and combined clinical data and biomarker assessments. Integrated discrimination improvement tested the discriminate value of the biomarker and combined models compared with the clinical data model. RESULTS: We enrolled 115 patients: 49 determined to have an infection (43%) and 66 without (57%). All biomarkers were significantly associated with infection in univariate analysis. The best clinical model (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.76) included initial temperature (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2) and history of fever (OR, 5.0; CI, 1.4-14). The best biomarker model (AUC, 0.82) predicting infection included sE-selectin (OR, 11.0; 95% CI, 1.6-74) and interleukin 6 (OR, 5.1; CI, 2.3-11.6). The combined clinical and biomarker model had an AUC of 0.88, with integrated discrimination improvement = 0.21, compared with the clinical model alone. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory and endothelial markers can improve the clinical identification of infection in ED patients with AVSs.

Acid suppression therapy does not predispose to Clostridium difficile infection: the case of the potential bias.

OBJECTIVE: An adverse effect of acid-suppression medications on the occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been a common finding of many, but not all studies. We hypothesized that association between acid-suppression medications and CDI is due to the residual confounding in comparison between patients with infection to those without, predominantly from non-tested and less sick subjects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of acid suppression therapy on incidence of CDI by comparing patients with CDI to two control groups: not tested patients and patients suspected of having CDI, but with a negative test. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of adult patients hospitalized in internal medicine department of tertiary teaching hospital between 2005-2010 for at least three days. Controls from each of two groups (negative for CDI and non-tested) were individually matched (1:1) to cases by primary diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity index, year of hospitalization and gender. Primary outcomes were diagnoses of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9)-coded CDI occurring 72 hours or more after admission. RESULTS: Patients with CDI were similar to controls with a negative test, while controls without CDI testing had lower clinical severity. In multivariable analysis, treatment by acid suppression medications was associated with CDI compared to those who were not tested (OR = 1.88, p-value = 0.032). Conversely, use of acid suppression medications in those who tested negative for the infection was not associated with CDI risk as compared to the cases (OR = 0.66; p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the reported epidemiologic associations between use of acid suppression medications and CDI risk may be spurious. The control group choice has an important impact on the results. Clinical differences between the patients with CDI and those not tested and not suspected of having the infection may explain the different conclusions regarding the acid suppression effect on CDI risk.