Prognostic nomogram for nonresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: A nomogram is progressively being used as a useful predictive tool for cancer prognosis. A nomogram to predict survival in nonresectable pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy has not been reported. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data on patients with nonresectable pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at five Japanese hospitals, we derived a predictive nomogram and internally validated it using a concordance index and calibration plots. RESULTS: In total, 531 patients were included between June 2001 and February 2013. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stages were III and IV in 204 and 327 patients, respectively. The median survival time of the total cohort was 11.3 months. A nomogram was generated to predict survival probabilities at 6, 12, and 18 months and median survival time, based on the following six variables: age; sex; performance status; tumour size; regional lymph node metastasis; and distant metastasis. The concordance index of the present nomogram was higher than that of the AJCC TNM staging system at 12 months (0.686 vs 0.612). The calibration plots demonstrated good fitness of the nomogram for survival prediction. CONCLUSIONS: The present nomogram can provide valuable information for tailored decision-making early after the diagnosis of nonresectable pancreatic cancer.

A multicentre randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: GEMSAP study.

BACKGROUND: This randomised phase II trial compared gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 4-week treatment with gemcitabine alone (1000, mg m(-2) gemcitabine by 30-min infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) or gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (1000, mg m(-2) gemcitabine by 30-min infusion on days 1 and 15 and 40 mg m(-2) S-1 orally twice daily on days 1-15). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between July 2006 and February 2009, 106 patients were enrolled. The PFS in gemcitabine and S-1 combination arm was significantly longer than in gemcitabine arm (5.4 vs 3.6 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (P=0.036). Overall survival (OS) for gemcitabine and S-1 combination was longer than that for gemcitabine monotherapy (13.5 vs 8.8 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.72 (P=0.104). Overall, grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy demonstrated longer PFS in advanced pancreatic cancer. Improved OS duration of 4.7 months was found for gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy, though this was not statistically significant.

Inhibition of renin-angiotensin system affects prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is thought to have a role in carcinogenesis, and RAS inhibition may prevent tumour growth. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the impact of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) in 155 patients with pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. Patients were divided into three groups: the ACEI/ARB group (27 patients receiving an ACEI or ARB for hypertension (HT)), the non-ACEI/ARB with HT group (25 patients receiving antihypertensive drugs other than ACEIs or ARBs), and the non-HT group (103 patients receiving no antihypertensive drugs). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were not different, except for age and HT medications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 months in the ACEI/ARB group, 4.5 months in the non-ACEI/ARB with HT group, and 3.6 months in the non-HT group. Overall survival (OS) was 15.1 months in the ACEI/ARB group, 8.9 months in the non-ACEI/ARB with HT group, and 9.5 months in the non-HT group. The use of ACEIs/ARBs was a significant prognostic factor for both PFS (P=0.032) and OS (P=0.014) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The ACEIs/ARBs in combination with gemcitabine might improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Prospective trials are needed to test this hypothesis.

Self-expandable metallic stents for malignant biliary obstruction with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction.

BACKGROUND: Anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (APBJ) is associated with pancreaticobiliary cancer. Limited data are available on endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction with APBJ. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of self-expandable metallic stents (EMSs) for the management of malignant biliary obstruction with APBJ. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2005, 324 patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction underwent insertion of an EMS. Six of these patients with concomitant APBJ constituted the subjects of this study. Early (30 days after EMS insertion) stent-related complications and stent patency were evaluated in these six patients. RESULTS: The cause of biliary obstruction was gallbladder cancer in four patients and pancreatic cancer in two patients. Uncovered EMSs were inserted across the common channel without performance of a biliary sphincterotomy. The diameter of the uncovered EMS used was based on the diameter of the common channel. For all six patients, endoscopic biliary drainage was successful, and their jaundice subsided steadily. None of the six patients experienced early complications, including acute pancreatitis. The mean stent-related complication-free period was 163 days. Stent occlusion caused by tumor ingrowth occurred in two patients. Acute cholangitis and cholecystitis were observed in one patient each. CONCLUSIONS: Uncovered EMSs are effective for palliation of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction in patients who have APBJ without increasing the risk of stent-related early complications.

Development of a novel microbial sensor with baker's yeast cells for monitoring temperature control during cold food chain.

A novel microbial sensor containing a commercial baker's yeast with a high freeze tolerance was developed for visibly detecting inappropriate temperature control of food. When the yeast cells fermented glucose, the resulting gas production triggered the microbial sensor. The biosensor was a simple, small bag containing a solution of yeast cells, yeast extract, glucose, and glycerol sealed up with multilayer transparent film with barriers against oxygen and humidity. Fine adjustment of gas productivity in the biosensor at low temperatures was achieved by changing either or both concentrations of glucose and yeast cells. Moreover, the amount of time that food was exposed to inappropriate temperatures could be deduced by the amount of gas produced in the biosensor. The biosensor was stable without any functional loss for up to 1 week in frozen storage. The biosensor could offer a useful tool for securing food safety by maintaining low-temperature control in every stage from farm to fork, including during transportation, in the store, and at home.

Laparoscopic intragastric stapled resection of gastric submucosal tumors located near the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection cannot be applied easily to tumors located near the esophagogastric junction or the pyloric ring. We evaluated our laparoscopic intragastric surgical technique for gastric submucosal tumors located near the esophagogastric junction and the results of a clinical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed our technique in six patients: one man and five woman with a mean age of 61 years. Using the laparoscopic procedure, after inflation of the stomach, we inserted two or three balloon-type ports into the stomach through the abdominal wall. RESULTS: A stapled resection of gastric submucosal tumors using a laparoscopic linear stapler was performed successfully in all the patients. Without exception, stapled resections were successfully performed. The mean operation time was 168 min, and the blood loss was minimal There were no intra- or postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.8 days. The mean maximal diameter size of the resected specimens was 2.4 cm. Histopathologic diagnoses were gastrointestinal stromal tumors in five cases and enterogenous cyst in one. There were no recurrences during a mean follow-up period of 27 +/- 11.6 months. CONCLUSION: Although we need to evaluate the long-term outcomes, our procedure is considered technically feasible, safe, and useful for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors located near the esophagogastric junction.