Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol ; 24(3): 176-83, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23979564

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We aimed to compare gender differences with respect to presentation of consecutive ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), management of their disease, and outcomes. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of an observational (non-interventional) study performed by 616 office- and hospital-based cardiologists in Germany. Consecutive (mainly ambulatory) patients with Electrocardiography (ECG) -confirmed AF and available data from baseline (BL) and two follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2,742 patients (62.8% males, mean age 67.5 years; 37.2% women, mean age 71.2 years) were analysed. Women had more frequently paroxysmal and less frequently permanent AF. Quality of life scores were slightly worse in women compared to men, for all types of AF. For class III anti-arrhythmic drugs at baseline (more frequent in men), and for digitalis (less frequent in men at BL and 1 year) statistically significant differences were noted. Oral anti-coagulation (OAC) without anti-platelet drugs was given in 67.9% at BL and in 62.7% at 1 year (no differences between genders). During follow-up, drug conversions in men/women were reported in 12.3%/14.9% (p=0.054), and electrical conversions in 14.6%/11.7% (p=0.03). Hospitalisations occurred in 25.9% and strokes in 3.5%. Patients with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores had increased stroke rates (0, 1 and ≥2 points: 0.0, 1.5 and 3.9%, respectively; with no significant gender differences). CONCLUSION: In everyday management of patients with AF, there were no differences in treatment and major outcomes, in particular stroke, between women and men. This finding is opposed to earlier studies reporting OAC undertreatment of women and higher stroke rates.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Rationing/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Electric Countershock/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 167(3): 750-6, 2013 Aug 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22475841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the current management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by cardiologists, and to identify predicting factors for a stable disease course. METHODS: 2753 consecutive patients with ECG-confirmed AF in the previous 12 months were documented in a 1-year observational (non-interventional) study from 616 centers. Stable disease was defined as having neither AF related intervention nor change in antiarrhythmic therapy in the previous 12 months. Stepwise selection of parameters for multivariate regression was used to identify factors for stable AF. RESULTS: At baseline, paroxysmal AF was reported in 33.5%, persistent in 26.7%, and permanent in 39.7%; rate control alone was the prevailing antiarrhythmic strategy (64.2%). Drugs for thromboembolic prevention were administered in 93.8%, with a clear predominance of oral anticoagulants (OAC), alone or in combination with antiplatelet drugs. Electrical or pharmacological conversions were reported in 23.6%. A total of 96 (3.5%) patients in the total cohort experienced stroke, 72 patients (2.6%) TIA, and 24 (0.9%) arterial embolism. 26% were hospitalized during follow-up (0.4 events per patient), and 9.4% developed incident heart failure (42% prevalence at follow-up). The rate of stable patients was 43.4%. In the multivariate model male gender, history of stroke, and permanent (vs. persistent) AF were associated with stable disease. Conversely, the factors chronic heart failure, impaired left ventricular function, rhythm-control (vs. other), OAC and antiplatelet therapy were significantly correlated with unstable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low proportion of stable patients and in particular, the high hospitalization and stroke rate indicate difficulties in everyday management of patients with AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Hospitalization/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Disease Management , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 27(5): 995-1003, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21391837

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to collect comprehensive data on atrial fibrillation (AF) in ambulatory and hospital-based management in Germany. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ECG-confirmed AF in the previous 12 months were documented in a non-interventional study in 638 physician offices (78.0%) or hospitals (12.7%). RESULTS: Of the 3354 patients (mean age 68.9 ± 10.1 years; CHADS(2) score 1.9 ± 1.3), a total of 1136 (33.9%) had paroxysmal, 899 (26.8%) persistent, 1295 (38.6%) permanent and 24 (0.7%) unspecified AF. In the 12 months prior to documentation, pharmacological conversion was attempted in 18.2%, electric cardioversion in 17.5%, the combination of both in 31.2%, and catheter ablation of AF in 5.5%. Only 41.4% of patients met the definition of stable disease (having neither AF related intervention nor change in antiarrhythmic therapy in the previous 12 months). As treatment strategy, physicians stated rate control in 64%, rhythm control in 8%, and both in 19% (not reported: 8%). Patients received antiarrhythmic drugs of class IA in 1.3%, IC in 13.8%, II in 78.1%, III in 17.9%, IV in 9.7% and digitalis in 26.7%. Drugs for thromboembolic prevention (oral anticoagulants and/or antithrombotics) were administered in 81.5%. Hospitalisations for AF or associated diseases in the previous 12 months were reported in 34.2%. Possible limitations include the open, observational design, selection of physicians with particular interest in the field and selection of patients (i.e. underrepresentation of critically ill individuals). CONCLUSIONS: While treatment rates with regards to the prevention of thromboembolic events were among the highest reported to date, the low proportion of stable patients and in particular, the high hospitalisation rate hint at difficulties in the management of patients with AF in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Public , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Cardiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...