Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy for cervical and endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-six patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy between February 1999 and September 2005. The lymph nodes dissected with the laparoscopic procedure included the inframesenteric para-aortic lymph nodes, the sacral lymph nodes, and the bilateral common iliac lymph nodes. The extraperitoneal laparoscopic operation was performed with pelvic open surgery using Lap Disc to ensure the safety of patients. RESULTS: The number of patients with cervical and endometrial carcinoma was 36 and 40, respectively. The median age of patients was 51 years (range 24-75 years). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 8 patients. These include 3 patients who encountered blood loss of 400, 136 and 128 ml; 2 extremely obese women; and 3 patients who had peritoneal tears causing CO2 gas leakage. Among the remaining 68 patients, the median operating time for extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy was 75 min (range 45-145 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 5 ml (range 5-138 ml). The median total number of resected nodes was 14 (range 2-31), and 4 patients had lymph node metastasis. No patient encountered postoperative complications attributable to extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy with pelvic open surgery using Lap Disc is a feasible procedure, particularly in the surgeons learning phase.

Phase III double-blind randomized trial of radiation therapy for stage IIIb cervical cancer in combination with low- or high-dose Z-100: treatment with immunomodulator, more is not better.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of low or high-dose immunomodulator, Z-100, in combination with radiotherapy for cervical cancer. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 221 patients with stage IIIb squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were randomly assigned to treatment with Z-100 either at 0.2 microg or 40 microg in a double-blind manner in combination with radiotherapy. RESULTS: The 5-year survival of patients with high-dose and low-dose Z-100 was 41.5% (95% CI: 31.7-51.3%) and 58.2% (95% CI: 48.7-67.7%), respectively, showing a 30% reduction in the death rate (hazard ratio: 0.670 [95% CI: 0.458-0.980], P = 0.039). Survival of high-dose group was equivalent to the 4-year survival of the radiotherapy plus hydroxyurea arm (49.7%) of GOG120 study, and that of low-dose group was similar to the survival of the cisplatin-based chemoradiation arm. The progression-free survival was also significantly improved in favor of low-dose group (hazard ratio: 0.667 [95% CI: 0.447-0.997], P = 0.048). The survival of low-dose group was similar to the survival of the cisplatin-based chemoradiation arms of the GOG120 study. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpectedly, the survival of patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by lower dose of Z-100 in combination with radiotherapy was significantly better than those treated with higher dose Z-100, which was equivalent to the survival with radiotherapy alone. The hypothesis that lower dose of Z-100 enhances the efficacy of radiation therapy is now being tested by placebo-controlled randomized trial.

Intraperitoneal carboplatin infusion may be a pharmacologically more reasonable route than intravenous administration as a systemic chemotherapy. A comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of platinum using a new mathematical model after intraperitoneal vs. intravenous infusion of carboplatin--a Sankai Gynecology Study Group (SGSG) study.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the pharmacological advantage of carboplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the three-compartment mathematical model. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients in one institution underwent intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin, and 11 consecutive patients in another institution received intravenous administration. Carboplatin (AUC=6 mg x min/ml) was diluted in 500 ml 5% glucose and administered either as an intraperitoneal bolus infusion or intravenous drip infusion during 1 h. Patients undergoing intravenous injection also received an infusion of 500 ml 5% glucose to obtain intraperitoneal samples. Intraperitoneal fluid and blood samples were obtained, immediately and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after administration. The mathematical model consisting of a three-compartment model was applied to analyze the pharmacokinetics. The model was created with simultaneous differential equations and was solved by the Runge-Kutta method. RESULTS: The rate constants of platinum diffusion from the peritoneal cavity to serum, serum to peritoneal cavity, serum to peripheral space, peripheral space to serum, and elimination were 0.94+/-0.79 (mean+/-SD), 1.28+/-2.50, 16.50+/-9.26, 0.99+/-0.62, and 4.14+/-1.45 (h-1), respectively. When the theoretical pharmacological concentration of platinum was calculated using this mathematical model, 24-h platinum AUC in the serum was exactly the same regardless of intraperitoneal or intravenous administration of carboplatin. However, the 24-h platinum AUC in the peritoneal cavity was approximately 17 times higher when carboplatin was administered by the intraperitoneal route. CONCLUSION: The present pharmacological analysis suggests that intraperitoneal infusion of carboplatin is feasible not only as an intraperitoneal regional therapy but also as a more reasonable route for systemic chemotherapy.

Difference of carboplatin clearance estimated by the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe, Wright or Chatelut formula.

OBJECTIVE: Although the Calvert formula is the standard method to calculate the dose of carboplatin, there is no consensus how to determine the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) without using [51Cr]-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA). Creatinine clearance (Ccr), calculated using the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe or Wright formulae, has been used as a substitute for the GFR. In addition to these four formulae, the Chatelut formula has been proposed as a way to calculate carboplatin clearance. Among these formulae, Jelliffe formula does not include body surface area (BSA) or body weight to adjust the body size and thus may have greater bias than the other four formulae in estimating carboplatin clearance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if these five formulae could equally estimate the carboplatin clearance. METHODS: : Carboplatin clearance was estimated in 253 patients with gynecologic cancer who received carboplatin-based chemotherapy between January 1996 and August 2004. Ccr was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe or Wright formulae. Carboplatin clearance was also calculated directly by using the Chatelut formula. The five estimations of carboplatin clearance were compared with each other using the post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank test. The median percent error (MPE) and the median absolute percent error (MAPE) were evaluated by comparing carboplatin clearance. The relationships between BSA and ratios of estimated carboplatin clearance (Jelliffe/Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe/Modified-Jelliffe, Jelliffe/Wright, Jelliffe/Chatelut) were evaluated by using simple regression. RESULTS: : The estimated carboplatin clearances were: Cockroft-Gault formula, 109.8 +/- 28.4; Jelliffe formula, 128.5 +/- 28.2; Modified-Jelliffe formula, 110.8 +/- 25.7; Wright formula, 112.2 +/- 24.3; Chatelut formula, 114.1 +/- 33.0. A statistically significant difference was observed between carboplatin clearance calculated using Jelliffe formula and that given by each of the other four formulae. Comparing the results of the Cockroft-Gault formula with the Jellife, Modified-Jelliffe, Wright and Chatelut formulae yielded MPEs of +19%, +2%, +3% and +3% and MAPEs of 27%, 5%, 6% and 6%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between BSA and ratio of estimated carboplatin clearance (Jelliffe/Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe/Modified-Jelliffe, Jelliffe/Wright, Jelliffe/Chatelut), with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.928, 0.847, 0.965 and 0.839 respectively. As the BSA of patient became smaller, the differences between the carboplatin clearance calculated by the Jelliffe formula from other four formulas became larger. CONCLUSIONS: : Estimates of carboplatin clearance calculated by the Jelliffe formula tend to have greater positive bias compared to the other four formulae, particularly when the BSA of the patient is small. In order to conduct collaborative international studies, it may be necessary to standardize the formula used to estimate carboplatin clearance to perform international collaboration studies.

Combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent cervix cancer. A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: This is a pilot study for a future trial to assess the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent uterine cervix cancer. METHODS: The patients eligible for this study had histologically confirmed, advanced (stage IB2-IV) or recurrent uterine cervix cancer. Eligible patients had measurable lesions and must have sufficient bone marrow, renal, and liver functions. Docetaxel was administered intravenously (IV) at 60 mg/m2 followed by IV carboplatin administration based on AUC = 6. Chemotherapy was repeated in 1-6 courses depending on the purpose of the therapy. The response was evaluated based on RECIST criteria. The toxicity grade was determined by NCI-CTC version 2. RESULTS: During January 2001 and April 2004, 17 patients were entered in this study. The distribution of stage was IB2, 3; IIB, 8; IIIB, 3; IVB, 1; recurrent, 2. There were 9 squamous cell carcinomas, 6 adenocarcinomas, 1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma, and 1 small cell carcinoma. The overall response rate was 76% (2 CR, 11 PR, and 4 SD). No progression of disease was observed. All 5 adenocarcinoma patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group responded including 1 pathological CR. The incidences of grade 3/4 toxicities were 76% for neutrocytopenia, 12% for thrombocytopenia, and 6% for anemia. No grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is an effective and safe treatment for uterine cervix cancer. Further evaluation particularly targeted on cervical adenocarcinoma is warranted.

First-line intraperitoneal carboplatin-based chemotherapy for 165 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma: results of long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, no long-term follow-up data are available on intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin-based chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. In this study we evaluated retrospectively the survival and recurrence of a retrospective cohort of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with first-line IP carboplatin-based therapy. METHODS: Records were reviewed of 174 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who received IP carboplatin-based therapy between 1990 and 2000. All patients underwent surgical staging, and implantable port systems were placed regardless of residual tumor size. The pathological slides were submitted and reviewed, and then nine patients were excluded because of borderline malignancies (n = 8), and wrong histology (n = 1). Therefore, the records of 165 patients were analyzed for survival. Tumor grade was determined by the Universal grading system. Statistical analysis included tests for association between potential prognostic factors, and between prognostic factors and survival. Survival probabilities were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated by a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53.7 years (range 21-83). The median follow-up was 41 months. The distribution by stage and histology was as follows: high risk (grade 2/3, clear cell, capsule rupture) stage I, 54; II, 21; III, 72; IV, 18; and serous, 75; clear cell, 30; mucinous, 27; endometrioid, 20; others, 13. The chemotherapy regimen was either carboplatin alone (n = 22) or in combination with cyclophosphamide (n = 116) or paclitaxel (n = 27). Catheter-related complications occurred in 16 (9.7%) cases. The chemotherapeutic response in 54 patients with measurable disease was 66.4%. The 5-year survival was 94.4% for stage I, and 87.9% for stage II. The median survival for optimal and suboptimal stage III/IV patients was 51 months and 34 months, respectively. The median survival of patients with stage III/IV disease was 51 months with carboplatin doses of 400 mg/m(2) or more, but it was only 25 months with carboplatin doses smaller than 400 mg/m(2). Poor prognostic factors, determined by Cox regression multivariate analysis, were clear cell histology (P < 0.001) and a carboplatin dose smaller than 400 mg/m(2) (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients who underwent carboplatin-based IP chemotherapy was excellent when the dose of carboplatin was higher than 400 mg/m(2). A prospective evaluation of IP carboplatin therapy with modern combination is warranted.

A feasibility study on biweekly administration of docetaxel for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A recent study demonstrated that docetaxel (DTX) was an effective agent for second line chemotherapy against ovarian cancer. Weekly administration of taxane compounds had been more effective compared with a 3 week interval administration in ovarian cancer. The role of biweekly administration of DTX has been unknown. We conducted a dose determination and feasibility study of biweekly DTX administration in patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer who received one or more regimens of prior chemotherapy with more than 4 weeks of treatment-free interval were eligible. DTX was administered as 1-h intravenous infusion every two weeks for at least four courses. The starting dose was 40 mg/m(2) (level 1) and the dose was escalated to 50 mg/m(2) (level 2) and 60 mg/m(2) (level 3) in consequent patient cohorts. RESULTS: Nine patients were examined in this study. The treatments were completely performed in all cohorts. Mean treatment delay ranged from 0 to 2.0 days. Dose level did not affect treatment delay. At the first dose level, no patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Two patients in level 2 experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. In level 3, all patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities were tolerable. Of eight patients with measurable disease, all patients in level 1 showed progressive disease, and all patients in level 2 were no-change. There were two responders showing complete response and partial response and one case was no-change in level 3. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that biweekly administration of 60 mg/m(2) DTX was feasible for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Platelet-sparing effect of paclitaxel in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients.

Carboplatin has proven to be effective in the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who have responded to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. However, thrombocytopenia is a problem in heavily pretreated patients. Paclitaxel has a so-called platelet-sparing effect, but until now it was unknown whether this effect could be obtained in heavily pretreated patients. We treated four patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancers who had previously undergone heavy chemotherapy. Because these patients had responded to platinum-based first-line therapy, single carboplatin administration was employed. Although satisfactory tumor marker responses were obtained, thrombocytopenia occurred. When paclitaxel was administered before the carboplatin infusion in the subsequent treatments, the thrombocytopenia became milder. It was concluded that a platelet-sparing effect was also observed in patients who had undergone heavy prior chemotherapy.