ABSTRACT
Corrigan's pulse is characterized by the abrupt distension and quick collapse of carotid arteries in aortic regurgitation, whereas water hammer pulse is the characteristic pulse observed in peripheral arteries.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) under clopidogrel treatment is frequently observed in hemodialysis (HD) patients. In such patients, 10mg of prasugrel has reportedly inhibited platelet reactivity more adequately compared with 75mg of clopidogrel. However, the efficacy of 3.75mg prasugrel in Japanese HD patients is largely unknown. METHODS: A total of 41 Japanese coronary artery disease patients under HD who received aspirin and clopidogrel were enrolled. Clopidogrel was switched to 3.75mg prasugrel. At day 14, prasugrel was switched to clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was measured using VerifyNow assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) at baseline, day 14, and day 28. VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) >208 was defined as HPR. RESULTS: The PRU level on prasugrel therapy was significantly lower than that on clopidogrel therapy before switching (219.1±62.3 PRU vs. 238.2±68.0 PRU, p=0.02). Although the prevalence of HPR was numerically lower on prasugrel therapy compared with clopidogrel therapy before and after switching, the differences did not reach a statistical significance (57.6% vs. 75.7% vs. 74.2%, p=0.13). Even under prasugrel treatment, more than half of patients showed HPR. CONCLUSIONS: Although low-dose prasugrel had somewhat better antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel, it could not significantly improve the prevalence of HPR in Japanese HD patients. Higher doses of prasugrel might be needed to achieve adequate platelet inhibition in this high thrombotic risk population.
Subject(s)
Blood Platelets/drug effects , Clopidogrel/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Drug Substitution/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Aged , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Female , Humans , Japan , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Function Tests , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Renal DialysisABSTRACT
There is little information about long-term (> 1 year) outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in dialysis patients. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using SES was performed in 63 dialysis patients with 77 lesions. A control group for comparison was composed of 45 consecutive dialysis patients with 62 lesions who received PCI using bare metal stents (BMS). Clinical follow-up duration was 21.7 +/- 8.4 months in the SES group and 32.1 +/- 9.2 months in the BMS group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the in-segment restenosis rate (30% versus 40%, P = 0.20) between the 2 groups. The 3-year mortality (22.5% versus 22.2%, P = 0.75), myocardial infarction (3.8% versus 4.9%, P = 0.93), target lesion revascularization (24.7% versus 31.0%, P = 0.61), and stent thrombosis rates (3.8% versus 2.4%, P = 0.73) were not significantly different between the SES and BMS groups. Compared to BMS, SES do not improve long-term clinical outcomes in dialysis patients.
