Adherence to Mediterranean diet, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and severity of coronary artery disease: Contemporary data from the INTERCATH cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guidelines recommend a healthy diet as a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Although the Mediterranean diet (MD) is the best studied dietary pattern for CV outcomes, data on association between MD and severity of CAD are limited. Therefore, we analysed dietary data in association with the SYNTAX score in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients from the INTERCATH study. METHODS: The INTERCATH study is an observational study in patients undergoing coronary angiography at the University Heart Center Hamburg. Coronary morphology is assessed by the SYNTAX score. A lifestyle questionnaire collects dietary data with food frequency questions at baseline. Based on seven dietary characteristics, we calculated an established Mediterranean diet score (MDS) with a range of 0-28 points at which 28 points reflect maximal adherence to MD. To investigate the association of MD with severity of CAD, we performed logistic regression analysis after adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 1121 patients, 27% were women. The median age was 70.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 61.1,77.0). CV risk factors were distributed as expected for a CAD cohort (31.3% diabetes, 81.1% arterial hypertension, 34.0% smoking, median BMI 26.6 kg/m2 (IQR 24.1, 30.3), median LDL-C 87 mg/dL (IQR 65.0,116,6). Of all variables included, the strongest correlation with MDS was found for log (hs-CRP) (r = -0.21, p < 0.001). Adherence to MD represented by a higher MDS was significantly associated with a reduced probability for a medium/high risk SYNTAX score of ≥23 with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.923 per point increase of MDS (95% confidence interval 0.869-0.979; p = 0.0079). This association remained significant after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors (OR 0.934, 95% CI 0.877-0.995, p = 0.035). After further adjustment for log (hs-CRP), the association remained no longer significant (OR 0.955 (0.893-1.022, p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary data set, we found an independent association of adherence to MD with a less complex CAD. Hs-CRP correlated significantly with adherence to MD and may be a marker of the vasoprotective effects of MD. These results strengthen the evidence for the protective effect of an MD pattern in CVD prevention.

Lipid Management After First Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: Contemporary Results From an Observational Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Although the efficacy of lipid-lowering medication (LLM) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established, the majority of patients fail to achieve their LDL-C goals. The evidence for measurement of LDL-C to achieve these goals is limited. The goal of the present study, therefore, was to analyze ambulatory LLM management in relation to performance of LDL-C measurements and achieved LDL-C levels after the initial diagnosis of CAD. METHODS: The study followed up a subcohort of 200 patients with newly diagnosed CAD of the INTERCATH trial, an observational study including patients undergoing coronary angiography. In addition to baseline information, data were collected on LLM, performance of lipid measurements, and laboratory results at a minimum of 6 months' postdischarge. FINDINGS: The mean age of the sample was 67.9 years, and 36.0% were women. In 34.5% of all patients, no measurement of LDL-C levels was performed during follow-up. We found no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without LDL-C measurements during follow-up. In patients with measurement of LDL-C levels, the frequency of intensification of statin medication according to LDL-C reduction was higher compared with those patients without LDL-C measurement (23.6% vs 4.3%; P < 0.001); all other categories of intensity adjustment were comparable. In patients with 3 LDL-C measurements, achieved LDL-C levels were significantly lower (mean, 81 mg/dL), and a higher proportion reached an LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (44.7%) compared with patients with 1 (95 mg/dL [P = 0.013]; 21.8%) or 2 (91 mg/dL [P = 0.037]; 28.9%) LDL-C measurements despite comparable LDL-C levels at baseline. Ezetimibe was used in 3.5% of the entire study cohort. IMPLICATIONS: We found no differences in patient characteristics between patients with and without LDL-C measurements after being newly diagnosed with CAD. Performance and frequency of LDL-C measurements were clearly associated with better, higher frequency of intensification of statin medication, lower achieved LDL-C levels, and a higher proportion of patients achieving the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL. These results suggest an important role of LDL-C measurements for secondary prevention after the initial diagnosis of CAD.