Heart rate variability and progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Low heart rate (HR) variability is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but the causes and mechanisms of this association are not well known. This prospective study was designed to test the hypothesis that reduced HR variability is related to progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Average HR and HR variability were analyzed in 12-hour ambulatory ECG recordings from 265 qualified patients participating in a multicenter study to evaluate the angiographic progression of coronary artery disease in patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (<1.1 mmol/L). Participants were randomized to receive a placebo or gemfibrozil therapy. The progression of coronary atherosclerosis was estimated by quantitative, computer-assisted analysis of coronary artery stenoses from the baseline angiograms and from repeated angiograms performed an average of 32 months later. The progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis of the patients randomized to placebo therapy was more marked in the tertile with the lowest standard deviation of all normal to normal R-R intervals (SDNN, 74+/-13 ms; mean decrease in the per-patient minimum luminal diameter -0.17 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.23 to -0.12 mm) than in the middle tertile (SDNN, 107+/-7 ms; mean decrease -0.05 mm; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01 mm) or highest tertile (SDNN, 145+/-25 ms; mean change 0.01 mm; 95% CI, -0. 04 to 0.02 mm) (P<0.001 between the tertiles). This association was abolished by gemfibrozil. SDNN was lower (P<0.001) and minimum HR was faster (P<0.01) in the patients with marked progression than in those with regression of focal coronary atherosclerosis. In multiple regression analysis including HR variability, minimum HR, demographic and clinical variables, smoking, blood pressure, glucose, lipid measurements and lipid-modifying therapy, progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis was independently predicted by the SDNN (beta=0.24; P=0.0001). Low HR variability analyzed from ambulatory ECG predicts rapid progression of coronary artery disease. HR variability provided information on progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis beyond that obtained by traditional risk markers of atherosclerosis.

Heart rate variability and dispersion of QT interval in patients with vulnerability to ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation after previous myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare QT dispersion measured from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24-h heart rate variability in patients with vulnerability to either ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation after a previous myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Increased QT interval dispersion and reduced heart rate variability have been shown to be associated with vulnerability to ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but the data have mainly been pooled from patients with presentation of stable ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: QT dispersion and time domain and two-dimensional vector analysis of heart rate variability were studied in 30 survivors of ventricular fibrillation with a previous myocardial infarction and with inducible unstable ventricular tachyarrhythmia by programmed electrical stimulation and in 30 postinfarction patients with clinical and inducible stable monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia. Both of these patient groups were matched, with respect to age, gender and left ventricular ejection fraction, with an equal number of postinfarction control patients without a history of arrhythmic events or inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia and arrhythmia-free survival during a follow-up period of 2 years. Forty-five age-matched healthy subjects served as normal control subjects. RESULTS: Standard deviation of all sinus intervals and long-term continuous RR interval variability analyzed from Poincaré plots were reduced in patients with vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation (p < 0.001 for both), but not in patients with ventricular tachycardia (p = NS for both), compared with postinfarction control subjects. Corrected QT (QTc) dispersion was significantly broader both in patients with ventricular fibrillation (p < 0.001) and in those with ventricular tachycardia (p < 0.05) than in matched postinfarction control subjects. Heart rate variability performed better than QTc dispersion in predicting vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased QT dispersion is associated with vulnerability to both ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Low heart rate variability is specifically related to susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation but not to stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, suggesting that the autonomic nervous system modifies the presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.