Effectiveness of levofloxacin for adult community-acquired pneumonia caused by macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: integrated results from four open-label, multicenter, phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The rate of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates is rising. Coresistance to several unrelated classes of antimicrobial agents is common and may limit the treatment options available for the management of infections caused by this pathogen. Although the fluoroquinolones appear to retain activity against macrolide-resistant pneumococci, limited clinical data exist to support their use in this setting. OBJECTIVE: This study integrated data from 4 clinical trials to determine whether the fluoroquinolone levofloxacin is an effective therapeutic agent for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. METHODS: Across the 4 trials, 271 adult patients with CAP were diagnosed with infections caused by S. pneumoniae; these constituted the intent-to-treat population. Clinical isolates obtained from each patient at admission were tested using broth microdilution for in vitro sensitivity to the macrolide erythromycin (minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints: susceptible, < or =0.25 microg/mL; intermediate, 0.5 microg/mL; resistant, > or =1.0 microg/mL). All patients received levofloxacin (500 mg once daily for 7-14 days) and were analyzed at a posttherapy visit (2-5 days after completion of therapy) for clinical and microbiologic outcomes; in 3 trials, patients were also examined at a poststudy visit (14-28 days after completion of treatment). Clinical and microbiologic outcomes were analyzed in patients infected with macrolide-resistant and macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae. RESULTS: A total of 235 evaluable patients infected with S. pneumoniae were identified from the 4 trials. Twenty-seven (11.5%) patients were infected with isolates resistant to erythromycin, of whom 26 (96.3%) were clinical successes. By comparison, the clinical success rate in patients infected with erythromycin-susceptible isolates was 97.7%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that if future studies demonstrate the clinical relevance of macrolide resistance, levofloxacin may be a useful therapeutic option in patients with CAP caused by macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. However, caution may be warranted to prevent overprescription of levofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones, given the potential for the development of resistance in S. pneumoniae.

An economic evaluation of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the outpatient treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine treatment costs of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult outpatients given oral (p.o.) levofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil as initial therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with a primary diagnosis of CAP were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled Phase III clinical trial. Both inpatients and outpatients were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: (1) intravenous (i.v.) or p.o. levofloxacin; or (2) i.v. ceftriaxone and/or p.o. cefuroxime axetil. METHODS: To make legitimate and meaningful cost comparisons between similar types of patients receiving drugs via the same route of administration (i.e., orally), this outpatient economic study examined the resource utilization of the 211 patients enrolled as outpatients who received oral formulations as initial treatment (levofloxacin, 103 patients; cefuroxime axetil, 108 patients). Resource utilization data and clinical trial data were collected concurrently. To generate cost estimates, Medicare cost estimates for resources were multiplied by the resource units used by patients in each treatment arm. RESULTS: Cost estimates indicated a total cost difference that favored the levofloxacin group (base case: $169; sensitivity analysis: $223 [P = .008]). The results for the base case were not significant (P = .094). In addition, within the cost categories, there was a statistically significant study drug cost differential favoring levofloxacin ($86; P = .0001 for both the base case and sensitivity analysis). CONCLUSION: Oral levofloxacin is less costly than oral cefuroxime axetil in the outpatient treatment of adults with CAP.

A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

Five hundred ninety patients were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of 7 to 14 days of levofloxacin treatment with that of ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Patients received either intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin (500 mg once daily) or the comparative agents, parenteral ceftriaxone (1 to 2 g once to twice daily) and/or oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily). Erythromycin or doxycycline could be added to the comparator arm at the investigator's discretion. The decision to use an intravenous or oral antimicrobial agent for initial therapy was made by the investigator. Clinical and microbiological evaluations were completed at the baseline, during treatment, 5 to 7 days posttherapy, and 3 to 4 weeks posttherapy. Four hundred fifty-six patients (226 given levofloxacin and 230 administered ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil) were evaluable for clinical efficacy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated in 15 and 12%, respectively, of clinically evaluable patients. One hundred fifty atypical pathogens were identified: 101 were Chlamydia pneumoniae, 41 were Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and 8 were Legionella pneumophila. Clinical success at 5 to 7 days posttherapy was superior for the levofloxacin group (96%) compared with the ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil group (90%) (95% confidence interval [CI] of -10.7 to -1.3). Among patients with typical respiratory pathogens who were evaluable for microbiological efficacy, the overall bacteriologic eradication rates were superior for levofloxacin (98%) compared with the ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil group (85%) (95% CI of -21.6 to -4.8). Levofloxacin eradicated 100% of the most frequently reported respiratory pathogens (i.e., H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae) and provided a >98% clinical success rate in patients with atypical pathogens. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone-cefuroxime axetil eradicated 100% of the S. pneumoniae cells detected in blood culture. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 5.8% of patients receiving levofloxacin and in 8.5% of patients administered ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil. Gastrointestinal and central and peripheral nervous system adverse events were the most common events reported in each treatment group. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that treatment with levofloxacin is superior to ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil therapy in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.