[The evaluation by CT of bone block position, interference screw placement and replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament after patellar ligament transplantation]. / Evaluierung von Knochenblockposition, Interferenzschraubenlage und Ersatzplastik des vorderen Kreuzbandes nach Ligamentum patellae-Transplantat mittels CT.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using ligamentum patellae autografts in the bone-tendon-bone technique with special regard to the position of blocks and interference screws. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study 28 patients were included after undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament replacement surgery. Data thus obtained were correlated with the postoperatively determined functional parameters of the affected joint. RESULTS: Interference screws, bone-blocks and ligamentous transplants could be well imaged using CT. In a comparison of our data with clinical results there was a statistically highly significant correlation between clinical outcome and the position of bone-blocks and interference screws in the tibia. Angles between screw and bone-block exceeding a standard deviation led to significantly worse results, while a divergence in femoral angles did not lead to significantly worse results. CONCLUSION: The postoperative study of anterior cruciate ligament replacement surgery by CT enables the evaluation of the transplant as well as the position of bone-blocks and interference screws.

Manifestations of Chlamydia induced arthritis in patients with silent versus symptomatic urogenital chlamydial infection.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether Chlamydia-infected patients with and without urogenital symptoms have similar rheumatological manifestations or whether they belong to distinct clinical groups. METHODS: In a university-based study, we examined patients with unexplained arthritis in whom other rheumatic diseases had been excluded for urogenital chlamydial infection, and we investigated the clinical and radiological manifestations of the Chlamydia-positive patients. RESULTS: Sixty of 283 patients (21%) with unexplained arthritis had urogenital chlamydial infection. The infection was asymptomatic in 30%. There was no difference in the pattern of arthritis or immunological and serological characteristics in the patients with and without symptoms of urogenital infection, respectively. CONCLUSION: The pattern of Chlamydia-induced arthritis is similar in patients with or without symptoms of urogenital chlamydial infection. To recognize CIA, it may be helpful to examine patients with unexplained arthritis for Chlamydia even though they do not have symptoms of urogenital infection.