ABSTRACT
$Human skulls frequently represent the only skeletal remains of an unidentified corpse available for forensic osteological examination. Skulls are very useful in reliably determining sex and also yield fairly good clues to an individual's age and ancestry. To date, however, a sufficiently accurate correlation between skull measurements and stature could not be found. In contrast, the results of a study by Rao et al. (2009) seemed to be promising, by finding a good correlation between the length of the coronal and sagittal sutures and stature in a male Indian population. In an attempt to verify the transferability of their results to a Central European population, the authors measured the length of the sagittal and coronal sutures with a tape measure along with body height in the course of 117 autopsies performed at the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University of Giessen during 2009 and 2010. The age of the individuals measured ranged from 15 to 96 years (mean value 52.8, median 51 years). Of these individuals, 82 were male and 35 were female. The length of the sagittal suture with respect to body length yielded a correlation coefficient of only r = 0.045 (p = 0.617) in the regression analysis. Similar results were found for the coronal suture: In this case the correlation coefficient was r = 0.015. With an assumed maximum permissible probability of error of α = 0.05, none of the performed regression analyses were found to be statistically significant. As expected, our results suggest that neither the length of the sagittal nor the length of the coronal suture is suitable for a forensic estimation of stature for Central European individuals.
