Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Wiad Lek ; 77(3): 375-382, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To determine the current prevalence of postpartum infections and antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial resistance of responsible pathogens in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: Multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to December 2022 in fifteen hospitals from twelve regions of Ukraine. Definitions of healthcare- associated postpartum infection were adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network. Antibiotic susceptibility was done by the disc diffusion test as recommended by EUCAST. RESULTS: Results: Among 21,968 women, 6,175 (28.1%) postpartum infections were observed. Of all postpartum infection cases, 83.1% were detected after hospital discharge. The postpartum infection rates were 17.3% after cesarean section and 10.8% after vaginal delivery. The most common postpartum infection types were endometritis (17.3%), followed by urinary tract Infection (3.5%), mastitis (3.4%), surgical site infection (excluding endometritis) (2.4%), and episiotomy site infection (1.5%). The predominant postpartum infection pathogens in Ukraine were: Escherichia coli (10.4%), Enterococcus spp. (9.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (6.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.8%), Enterobacter spp. (5.8%). In our study pathogens of postpartum infection had differently levels of resistance to antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Our results indicate that postpartum infections requiring medical attention are common in Ukraine and that most postpartum infections occur after hospital discharge, so that use of routine inpatient surveillance methods alone will lead to underestimation of postpartum infection rates. Optimizing the antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the burden of postpartum infection, but prevention is the key element.


Subject(s)
Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Female , Ukraine/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Adult , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Endometritis/microbiology , Endometritis/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Postpartum Period , Puerperal Infection/microbiology , Puerperal Infection/epidemiology , Cohort Studies
2.
Wiad Lek ; 75(8 pt 2): 2003-2009, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To determine the current prevalence of healthcare-associated tubo-ovarian infections in female and antimicrobial resistance of the responsible pathogens in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study was based on healthcare-associated infections surveillance data. Definitions of health¬care-associated tubo-ovarian infections were used from the CDC/ NHSN. The susceptibility to antibiotics was determined by disk diffusion method according to the EUCAST. RESULTS: Results: Among all the 1,528 of women in this study, the prevalence of healthcare-associated tubo-ovarian infections was 31.2%. Of these cases, Salpingitis, Oophoritis, and tubo-ovarian abscess were 47.5%, 34% and 18.5%, respectively. Of all cases tubo-ovarian infections in female, 74.7% were detected after hospital discharge. The predominant pathogens were: Escherichia coli (27.7%), Enterobacter spp. (12.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (8.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.1%), and Enterococcus faecalis (7.5%), followed by Proteus mirabilis (5.1%), Streptococcus spp. (4.5%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (4.4%), and Acinetibacter spp. (4%). Methicillin-resistance was ob¬served in 16.8% of S. aureus (MRSA). No strains S.aureus and E. faecalis resistant to vancomycin. The overall proportion of extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) production among Enterobacteriaceae was 24.7%. The prevalence of ESBL production among E. coli isolates was 28.6% and among K. pneumoniae 12.8%. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was observed in 14.9% E.coli and 11.3% K. pneumoniae isolates. Carbapenem resistance was identified in 11.3% of P.aeruginosa isolates. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: A healthcare-associated tubo-ovarian infections of the female in Ukraine is a common occurrence and many cases are caused by pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carbapenems , Cephalosporins , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Escherichia coli , Female , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Methicillin , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus aureus , Ukraine/epidemiology , Vancomycin , beta-Lactamases
3.
Wiad Lek ; 72(4): 513-518, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055523

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Introduction: Intra-abdominal infections are a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early clinical diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial therapy are the cornerstones in the management of all infections. The aim: Aim of our work was to obtain the first national estimates of the current prevalence of intra-abdominal infections and resistance of their causative agents to antibiotics in Ukrainian hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: In total of 1986 patients with microbiologically proven IAI were included in the study. The identification and antimicrobial susceptibility to antibiotics of cultures were determined, using automated microbiology analyzer and Kirby - Bauer antibiotic testing. RESULTS: Results: Among 1986 patients, 1404 (70.7%) community-acquired and 582 (29.3%) nosocomial infections were observed. Death during hospitalization was reported in 4.1% community-acquired cases and 7.7% nosocomial cases. The distribution of the microorganisms differed according to the nosocomial or community origin of the infection but not according to their location. In nosocomial patients were observed with increased proportions of Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The carbapenems and amikacin were the most consistently active against Enterobacteriaceae. Against P. aeruginosa, amikacin, imipenem, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin were the most active agents in community-acquired infections, while imipenem, cefepime and amikacin were the most active agents in nosocomial cases. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The significant risk factors defined should be addressed preoperatively to decrease the risk for nosocomial infections. Antibiotics application tactics should be determined in accordance with the local data of resistance to them in each surgical hospital.


Subject(s)
Intraabdominal Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Ukraine/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...