Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Molecules ; 22(7)2017 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28698456

ABSTRACT

Because of the complexity and global nature of the heparin supply chain, the control of heparin quality during manufacturing steps is essential to ensure the safety of the final active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). For this reason, there is a need to develop consistent analytical methods able to assess the quality of heparin early in production (i.e., as the crude heparin before it is purified to API under cGMP conditions). Although a number of analytical techniques have been applied to characterize heparin APIs, few of them have been applied for crude heparin structure and composition analyses. Here, to address this issue, NMR spectroscopy and chemometrics were applied to characterize 88 crude heparin samples. The samples were also analyzed by strong anion exchange HPLC (SAX-HPLC) as an orthogonal check of the purity levels of the crudes analyzed by NMR. The HPLC data showed that the chemometric analysis of the NMR data differentiated the samples based on their purity. These orthogonal approaches differentiated samples according their glycosaminoglycan (GAG) composition and their mono and disaccharide composition and structure for each GAG family (e.g., heparin/heparan, dermatan sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate A). Moreover, quantitative HSQC and multivariate analysis (PCA) were used to distinguish between crude heparin of different animal and tissue sources.


Subject(s)
Dermatan Sulfate/chemistry , Glycosaminoglycans/chemistry , Heparin/chemistry , Animals , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Dermatan Sulfate/isolation & purification , Drug Contamination , Glycosaminoglycans/isolation & purification , Heparin/isolation & purification , Heparin/standards , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Quality Control
2.
Anal Biochem ; 490: 52-4, 2015 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26278168

ABSTRACT

N-sulfonated oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (NS-OSCS), recently reported as a potential threat to the heparin supply, was prepared along with its intermediate derivatives. All compounds were spiked into marketplace heparin and subjected to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) identification assays for heparin (proton nuclear magnetic resonance [(1)H NMR], chromatographic identity, % galactosamine [%GalN], anti-factor IIa potency, and anti-factor Xa/IIa ratio). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) strong-anionic exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (SAX-HPLC) method resolved NS-OSCS from heparin and OSCS and had a limit of detection of 0.26% (w/w) NS-OSCS. The %GalN test was sensitive to the presence of NS-OSCS in heparin. Therefore, current USP heparin monograph tests (i.e., SAX-HPLC and %GalN) detect the presence of NS-OSCS in heparin.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/chemistry , Chondroitin Sulfates/analysis , Drug Contamination , Heparin/chemistry , Indicators and Reagents/analysis , Anion Exchange Resins , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Chondroitin Sulfates/chemistry , Chondroitin Sulfates/toxicity , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Dimethylformamide/chemistry , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Galactosamine/analysis , Heparin/pharmacology , Hydrazines/chemistry , Indicators and Reagents/chemistry , Indicators and Reagents/toxicity , Limit of Detection , Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Quality Control , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 85: 99-107, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23917037

ABSTRACT

During the 2007-2008 heparin crisis it was found that the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) testing monograph for heparin sodium or low molecular weight heparins did not detect the presence of the contaminant, oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS). In response to this concern, new tests and specifications were developed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and USP and put in place to detect not only the contaminant OSCS, but also to improve assurance of quality and purity of these drug products. The USP monographs for the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) approved for use in the United States (dalteparin, tinzaparin and enoxaparin) are also undergoing revision to include many of the same tests used for heparin sodium, including; one-dimensional (1D) 500 MHz (1)H NMR, SAX-HPLC, percent galactosamine in total hexosamine and anticoagulation time assays with purified Factor IIa or Factor Xa. These tests represent orthogonal approaches for heparin identification, measurement of bioactivity and for detection of process impurities or contaminants in these drug products. Here we describe results from a survey of multiple lots from three types of LMWHs in the US market which were collected after the 2009 heparin sodium monograph revision. In addition, innovator and generic versions of formulated enoxaparin products purchased in 2011 are compared using these tests and found to be highly similar within the discriminating power of the assays applied.


Subject(s)
Drug Contamination , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Electrophoresis, Capillary , Enoxaparin/pharmacology , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/pharmacology , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/standards , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
4.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 401(8): 2445-54, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21901459

ABSTRACT

We evaluated polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS) approaches to determine weight-average molecular weight (M(w)) and polydispersity (PD) of heparins. A set of unfractionated heparin sodium (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) samples obtained from nine manufacturers which supply the US market were assessed. For SEC-MALLS, we measured values for water content, refractive index increment (dn/dc), and the second virial coefficient (A(2)) for each sample prior to molecular weight assessment. For UFH, a mean ± standard deviation value for M(w) of 16,773 ± 797 was observed with a range of 15,620 to 18,363 (n = 20, run in triplicate). For LMWHs by SEC-MALLS, we measured mean M(w) values for dalteparin, tinzaparin, and enoxaparin of 6,717 ± 71 (n = 4), 6,670 ± 417 (n = 3), and 3,959 ± 145 (n = 3), respectively. PAGE analysis of the same UFH, dalteparin, tinzaparin, and enoxaparin samples showed values of 16,135 ± 643 (n = 20), 5,845 ± 45 (n = 4), 6,049 ± 95 (n = 3), and 4,772 ± 69 (n = 3), respectively. These orthogonal measurements are the first M(w) results obtained with a large heparin sample set on product being marketed after the heparin crisis of 2008 changed the level of scrutiny of this drug class. In this study, we compare our new data set to samples analyzed over 10 years earlier. In addition, we found that the PAGE analysis of heparinase digested UFH and neat LMWH samples yield characteristic patterns that provide a facile approach for identification and assessment of drug quality and uniformity.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/chemistry , Chromatography, Gel/methods , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel/methods , Heparin Lyase/metabolism , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/chemistry , Heparin/chemistry , Anticoagulants/metabolism , Heparin/metabolism , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/metabolism , Light , Molecular Weight , Refractometry , Scattering, Radiation
5.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 399(2): 581-91, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20680615

ABSTRACT

During the 2007-2008 heparin crisis, it was found that the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) testing monograph for unfractionated heparin sodium (UFH) did not detect the presence of the contaminant, oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) in heparin. In response to this concern, new tests and specifications were developed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and USP and put in place to not only detect the contaminant OSCS but also to improve assurance of quality and purity of the drug product. Additional tests were also developed to monitor the heparin supply chain for other possible economically motivated additives or impurities. In 2009, a new USP monograph was put in place that includes 500 MHz (1)H NMR, SAX-HPLC, %galactosamine in total hexosamine, and anticoagulation time assays with purified factor IIa or factor Xa. These tests represent orthogonal approaches for UFH identification, measurement of bioactivity, and for detection of process impurities or contaminants in UFH. The FDA has applied these analytical approaches to the study of UFH active pharmaceutical ingredients in the marketplace. Here, we describe results from a comprehensive survey of UFH collected from seven different sources after the 2009 monograph revision and compare these data with results obtained on other heparin samples collected during the 2007-2008 crisis.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/chemistry , Drug Contamination , Heparin/chemistry , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Chondroitin Sulfates/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Electrophoresis, Capillary/methods , Heparin/pharmacology , Humans , Quality Control , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 52(5): 656-64, 2010 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20233649

ABSTRACT

New assays have been developed to detect the presence of economically motivated additives (EMAs) and poor manufacturing processes in heparin. Here, selected oversulfated glycosaminoglycans that are possible EMAs to heparin were synthesized and the utility of current (1)H NMR, SAX-HPLC or anticoagulation time protocols were evaluated for the detection of native impurities (chondroitin sulfate A or B (CSA or CSB), or heparan sulfate (HS)), or synthetic contaminants (oversulfated-(OS)-CSA, OS-CSB, OS-HS or OS-Heparin) spiked into heparin sodium active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). The range of w/w percent LOD values from the SAX-HPLC analysis for heparin spiked with CSA, CSB, HS, OS-CSA, OS-CSB, OS-HS, OS-Heparin and two partially oversulfated CSA analogs was 0.05-0.12%. The 500 MHz 1D-(1)H NMR spectra of heparin spiked with 1.0-10% CSA, CSB, OS-CSA, or OS-CSB showed unique signal pattern changes while the samples spiked with HS, OS-HS, OS-Heparin or partially sulfated CSA were more difficult to identify using NMR data. The ratio of anticoagulation time values obtained with factor Xa and factor IIa were found to remain within USP specifications in the presence of 10% amounts of these impurities or contaminants. In a separate test, using OS-CSA spiked API heparin samples, the factor Xa or factor IIa to USP standard ratio were found to fall below the USP 0.9 specification value in samples spiked at ca. weight percent of 15% or greater of OSCS. We conclude that the SAX-HPLC assay is the most sensitive and robust assay to identify and quantitate possible GAG-based EMAs in heparin.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Heparin/chemistry , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Pharmaceutical Preparations/chemistry , Protons
7.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 51(4): 921-6, 2010 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19959313

ABSTRACT

We previously published a strong-anion-exchange-high performance liquid chromatography (SAX-HPLC) method for the detection of the contaminant over sulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) in heparin sodium active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). While APIs have been processed to remove impurities, crude heparins contain insoluble material, chondroitin sulfates, heparan sulfate, and proteins that may interfere with the recovery and measurement of OSCS. We examined 500MHz (1)H NMR, capillary electrophoresis (CE), and SAX-HPLC to quantify OSCS in crude heparin. Using our standard API protocol on OSCS spiked crude heparin samples; we observed a weight percent LOD and LOQ for the NMR approach of 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively, while the SAX-HPLC method gave values of 0.03% and 0.09%, respectively. CE data was not amenable to quantitative measurement of OSCS in crude heparin. We developed a modified HPLC sample preparation protocol using crude dissolved at the 100mg/mL level with a 2.5M NaCl solution. This SAX-HPLC approach gave a weight percent LOD of 0.02% and a LOQ of 0.07% and had better performance characteristics than that of the protocol used for APIs.


Subject(s)
Anion Exchange Resins , Chondroitin Sulfates/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Chromatography, Ion Exchange , Drug Contamination , Electrophoresis, Capillary , Heparin/chemistry , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 49(3): 670-3, 2009 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19167854

ABSTRACT

A chromatographic method was developed for the detection and quantification of the contaminant oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) and the impurity dermatan sulfate in heparin active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The HPLC analysis of heparin is carried out using a polymer-based strong anion exchange (SAX) column with gradient elution from 0.125 M sodium chloride to 2.5M sodium chloride buffered mobile phase. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for the contaminant OSCS in heparin were determined to be 0.03% and 0.1%, respectively. The LOD and LOQ for dermatan sulfate, an impurity in heparin sulfate, were determined to be 0.1% and 0.8%, respectively. This manuscript is not a policy document and is not intended to replace either of the methods (capillary electrophoresis and NMR) currently required by the FDA.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/analysis , Heparin/analysis , Chondroitin Sulfates/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Chromatography, Ion Exchange , Dermatan Sulfate/analysis , Drug Contamination , Electrophoresis, Capillary , Glycosaminoglycans/analysis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Indicators and Reagents , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
9.
Int J Pharm ; 306(1-2): 56-70, 2005 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16266793

ABSTRACT

This work investigated the use of non-traditional analytical methods to evaluate the quality of a variety of pharmaceutical products purchased via internet sites from foreign sources and compared the results with those obtained from conventional quality assurance methods. Traditional analytical techniques employing HPLC for potency, content uniformity, chromatographic purity and drug release profiles were used to evaluate the quality of five selected drug products (fluoxetine hydrochloride, levothyroxine sodium, metformin hydrochloride, phenytoin sodium, and warfarin sodium). Non-traditional techniques, such as near infrared spectroscopy (NIR), NIR imaging and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), were employed to verify the results and investigate their potential as alternative testing methods. Two of 20 samples failed USP monographs for quality attributes. The additional analytical methods found 11 of 20 samples had different formulations when compared to the U.S. product. Seven of the 20 samples arrived in questionable containers, and 19 of 20 had incomplete labeling. Only 1 of the 20 samples had final packaging similar to the U.S. products. The non-traditional techniques complemented the traditional techniques used and highlighted additional quality issues for the products tested. For example, these methods detected suspect manufacturing issues (such as blending), which were not evident from traditional testing alone.


Subject(s)
Internet , Marketing , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Drug Contamination , Drug Stability , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Quality Control , Solubility , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Thermogravimetry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...