Steps to consider in the approach and management of critically ill patient with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is a type of stroke associated with poor outcomes. Mortality is elevated, especially in the acute phase. From a pathophysiological point of view the bleeding must traverse different stages dominated by the possibility of re-bleeding, edema, intracranial hypertension, inflammation and neurotoxicity due to blood degradation products, mainly hemoglobin and thrombin. Neurological deterioration and death are common in early hours, so it is a true neurological-neurosurgical emergency. Time is brain so that action should be taken fast and accurately. The most significant prognostic factors are level of consciousness, location, volume and ventricular extension of the bleeding. Nihilism and early withdrawal of active therapy undoubtedly influence the final result. Although there are no proven therapeutic measures, treatment should be individualized and guided preferably by pathophysiology. The multidisciplinary teamwork is essential. Results of recently completed studies have birth to promising new strategies. For correct management it's important to establish an orderly and systematic strategy based on clinical stabilization, evaluation and establishment of prognosis, avoiding secondary insults and adoption of specific individualized therapies, including hemostatic therapy and intensive control of elevated blood pressure. Uncertainty continues regarding the role of surgery.

Patients' perspective on choosing the emergency department for nonurgent medical care: a qualitative study exploring one reason for overcrowding.

INTRODUCTION: For decades it has been known that patients use emergency departments for nonurgent care needs. This study was conducted to help determine how the health care community can assist patients achieve consistent health care while meeting the patient's perceived needs. METHOD: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted based on interviews with 31 persons between 22 and 43 years of age following an ED visit for a nonurgent medical need. Exploration of the patient's perception was accomplished through open-ended questions in a structured interview format. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Patients who participated in our study revealed 3 major themes: (1) They were unable to obtain an appointment with a primary care provider (PCP); (2) they were referred by the staff (not the doctor) in PCPs' offices to be evaluated in the emergency department; and (3) it took less of their time to be seen in the emergency department than it did to contact their PCP, only to then be told to go to the emergency department. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study support the need for health care providers to find ways to provide nonurgent care in a timely and efficient manner. Multiple options for providing this care need to be conceived and evaluated.