The NeuroSAFE frozen section technique during radical prostatectomy - Implementation and optimization of technical aspects in a routine pathology workflow.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In prostate cancer patients, application of the NeuroSAFE frozen section technique during radical prostatectomy has been shown to increase the rate of nerve sparing surgery and to improve functional outcome for the patients. The aim of this study is to report on technical and organizational optimization opportunities of the procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients submitted to bilateral intraoperative frozen section from January 2018 until December 2020 (n = 452) were retrospectively analyzed and parameters such as turnaround time, staff situation in the laboratory and histologic properties of the tumors were assessed. RESULTS: The median turnaround time per case was 40.3 ( ± 10.5) min. In 2020 the average time needed from accessioning to diagnosis was 38.1 min. Multivariate linear regression suggested that the number of technical assistants/cryotomes (46.1 min vs. 39.13 min; p < 0.001), the place of microscopic examination (43.0 min vs. 38.7 min; p < 0.001) and the presence of a positive margin (38.0 vs. 44.0 min; p < 0.001) were significant influential factors. The turnaround time was independent of the uropathological expertize of the consultant (39.84 min vs. 40.7 min; p = 0.09), the tumor grade (42.3 vs 39.8 min; p = 0.493) and the presence of extraprostatic extension (44.0 vs 39.8 min; p = 0.099). CONCLUSION: The implementation of simple optimization measures in the workflow as well as structured training of all pathology staff involved in the examination leads to a significant increase in the efficiency of the examination while maintaining the same level of resources. The results could thus be a contribution to the broader application of the procedure.

The peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate and PD-L1 status in invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the penis

IntroductionPenile carcinomas are rare tumors throughout Europe. Therefore, little attention is drawn to this disease. That makes it important to study tumor-associated key metrics and relate these to known data on penile neoplasias.Materials and methodsA cohort of 60 well-defined penile invasive carcinomas with known human papillomavirus (HPV) infection status was investigated. Data on tumor type, grading and staging were recorded. Additionally, data on the peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate in a semiquanititave manner applying an HE stain were assessed.ResultsOur study showed a significant correlation of immune cell infiltrate and pT stage with overall survival. Therefore, in a subset of tumors, PD-L1 staining was applied. For tumor proportion score (TPS), 26 of 30 samples (87%) were scored >0%. For the immune cell score (IC), 28 of 30 samples (93%) were defined as >0% and for CPS, 29 of 30 samples (97%) scored >0. PD-L1 expression was not associated with overall survival.ConclusionPD-L1 is expressed in penile carcinomas, providing a rationale for targeted therapy with checkpoint inhibitors. We were able to show that immune reaction appears to be prognostically relevant. These data enhance the need for further studies on the immune cell infiltrate in penile neoplasias and show that PD-L1 expression is existent in our cohort, which may be a potential target for checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

The peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate and PD-L1 status in invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the penis.

INTRODUCTION: Penile carcinomas are rare tumors throughout Europe. Therefore, little attention is drawn to this disease. That makes it important to study tumor-associated key metrics and relate these to known data on penile neoplasias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 60 well-defined penile invasive carcinomas with known human papillomavirus (HPV) infection status was investigated. Data on tumor type, grading and staging were recorded. Additionally, data on the peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate in a semiquanititave manner applying an HE stain were assessed. RESULTS: Our study showed a significant correlation of immune cell infiltrate and pT stage with overall survival. Therefore, in a subset of tumors, PD-L1 staining was applied. For tumor proportion score (TPS), 26 of 30 samples (87%) were scored >0%. For the immune cell score (IC), 28 of 30 samples (93%) were defined as >0% and for CPS, 29 of 30 samples (97%) scored >0. PD-L1 expression was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: PD-L1 is expressed in penile carcinomas, providing a rationale for targeted therapy with checkpoint inhibitors. We were able to show that immune reaction appears to be prognostically relevant. These data enhance the need for further studies on the immune cell infiltrate in penile neoplasias and show that PD-L1 expression is existent in our cohort, which may be a potential target for checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

[Localized prostate cancer]. / Das lokalisierte Prostatakarzinom.

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent noncutaneous cancer in men. The Gleason grading is considered to be the strongest prognostic parameter regarding progression-free survival and overall survival. The original grading system has been modified during the last decade resulting in a more precise prognostic tool. The pretreatment Gleason score guides clinical management and is a key component in S3 guidelines for prostate cancer. In addition to Gleason score several other histologic findings in prostate needle biopsy influence patient management. In this second part of our CME series about prostate cancer, we will discuss the diagnosis of prostate cancer and current guidelines for reporting prostate cancer. In addition, we will highlight prostate lesions of urothelial origin and neuroendocrine prostate cancer as well as prognostic biomarkers.

[Movember health care initiative 2019: prostate cancer screening at the University Hospital Frankfurt]. / Urologische Prostatakrebsvorsorge im Rahmen der Movember-Gesundheitsinitiative 2019 am Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt.

BACKGROUND: Men die earlier than women in Germany. Men also have impaired access to cancer screening compared to women. OBJECTIVES: Our Movember campaign 2019 at University Hospital Frankfurt (UKF) aimed at improving health care awareness in the context of prostate cancer checkup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In November 2019, every male employee of the UKF with a minimum age of 45 yrs (or 40 yrs with a first degree relative with prostate cancer) was offered a free prostate cancer checkup. This checkup contained digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound and PSA (prostata-specific antigen) testing. RESULTS: Overall, 121/840 employees (14.4%) participated in the Movember campaign. A first degree relative with prostate cancer was reported in overall by 14% of the participants (n = 17). At least one prior prostate cancer check up had 33%. A total of 2.5% (n = 3) had one prior negative prostate biopsy. Median age was 54 yrs (interquartile range 50-58). Median PSA level was 0.9 ng/ml and median free-PSA 0.3 ng/ml. A suspicious DRE was found in 5% (n = 6). After stratification according to age (≤ 50 yrs vs. > 50 yrs), participants over 50 yrs had a significantly higher PSA level (1.0 ng/ml vs. 0.7 ng/ml, p < 0.01) and had more frequently at least one prior prostate cancer checkup in the past (42.0 vs. 12.1%, p < 0.01). All suspicious DREs were in the cohort > 50 yrs. Overall, 32.2% (n = 39) had at least a suspicious checkup. A total of 3.3% (n = 4) had suspicious PSA levels. 17.4% (n = 21) of the participants had a suspicious PSA ratio (< 20%) only. During follow-up, 6 prostate biopsies were performed, with the detection of one case of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (Gleason 3 + 4, pT3a, pPn1, pNx, R0). CONCLUSION: Overall, 121 employees participated in our Movember Prostate cancer checkup campaign with measurement of the PSA level. Suspicious results were recorded in 32.2%. One employee was diagnosed and successfully treated with an intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

[Status of the availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) in bladder cancer-a questionnaire within the uropathology working group]. / Status der Verfügbarkeit und Anwendung von "next generation sequencing" (NGS) beim Harnblasenkarzinom ­ eine Umfrage in der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Uropathologie.

BACKGROUND: Technical advancement and availability of high-throughput analysis has advanced molecular subtyping of most cancers. Thus, new possibilities for precision oncology have emerged. AIM: Therefore, we aimed to collect data regarding availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for urothelial cancer within the uropathology working group of the German Society of Pathology. METHODS: We collected data by questionnaires and additionally asked for sequencing results of bladder cancers in the participating institutions. RESULTS: A total of 13 university-affiliated institutes of pathology took part in the survey. All university institutes offer NGS-based molecular panel diagnostics and provide panels covering between 15 and 170 genes. Altogether, only 20 bladder cancers were sequenced in routine diagnostics and for 10 cancers potential targeted treatment options were available. DISCUSSION: So far, despite availability of NGS diagnostics at university institutes of pathology, only few bladder cancer samples have been sequenced. Based on current data from the molecular subtyping of bladder cancers, we recommend a step-by-step protocol with basic immunohistochemistry analysis and subsequent subtype-dependent analyses, e.g., alterations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) or comprehensive gene panel analyses.

Upper-Urinary-Tract Effects After Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of Human Localised Renal-Cell Carcinoma (RCC) in the IRENE Pilot Phase 2a Ablate-and-Resect Study.

PURPOSE: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new potential ablation modality for small renal masses. Animal experiments have shown preservation of the urine-collecting system (UCS). The purpose of this clinical study was to perform the first evaluation and comparison of IRE's effects on the renal UCS by using urinary cytology, magnetic-resonance imaging, and resection histology in men after IRE of pT1a renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Seven patients with biopsy-proven RCC pT1a cN0cM0 underwent IRE in a phase 2a pilot ablate-and-resect study (IRENE trial). A contrast-enhanced, diffusion-weighted MRI and urinary cytology was performed 1 day before and 2, 7, and 27 days after IRE. Twenty-eight days after IRE the tumour region was completely resected surgically. RESULTS: Technical feasibility was demonstrated in all patients. In all cases, MRI revealed complete coverage of the tumour area by the ablation zone with degenerative change. The urographic late venous MRI phase (urogram scans) demonstrated normal morphological appearances. Urine cytology showed a temporary vacuolisation of the cyto- and caryoplasmas after IRE. Whereas the urothelium showed signs of regeneration 28 days after IRE-ablation, the tumour and parenchyma below it showed necrosis and permanent tissue destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Renal percutaneous IRE appears to be a safe treatment for pT1a RCC. The preservation of the UCS with unaltered normal morphology as well as urothelial regeneration and a phenomenon (new in urinary cytology) of temporary degeneration with vacuolisation of detached transitional epithelium cells were demonstrated in this clinical pilot study.

[Focal therapy of prostate cancer]. / Fokale Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

The target of focal therapy (FT) in prostate cancer (PC) is partial treatment of the prostate aiming at preserving surrounding anatomical structures. The intention is to minimize typical side effects of radical treatment options combined with local tumor control. Numerous established and new technologies are used. Results of published studies showed a good safety profile, few side effects and good preservation of functional results. Oncologic long-term data are lacking so far. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the only technology that has been studied in a published prospective randomized trial. The FT is challenged by the multifocality of PC; therefore, the quality of prostate biopsy, histopathological assessment as well as imaging are of paramount importance. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained increasing importance. The FT is experimental and should only be offered within clinical trials.

[MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy : Value in the context of focal therapy]. / MRT/TRUS-fusionierte Biopsiesysteme : Stellenwert bei der fokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Several systems for MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate are commercially available. Many studies have shown superiority of fusion systems for tumor detection and diagnostic quality compared to random biopsy. The benefit of fusion systems in focal therapy of prostate cancer (PC) is less clear. OBJECTIVES: Critical considerations of fusion systems for planning and monitoring of focal therapy of PC were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review of available fusion systems for the period 2013-5/2016 was performed. A checklist of technical details, suitability for special anatomic situations and suitability for focal therapy was established by the German working group for focal therapy (Arbeitskreis fokale und Mikrotherapie). RESULTS: Eight fusion systems were considered (Artemis™, BioJet, BiopSee®, iSR´obot™ Mona Lisa, Hitachi HI-RVS, UroNav and Urostation®). Differences were found for biopsy mode (transrectal, perineal, both), fusion mode (elastic or rigid), navigation (image-based, electromagnetic sensor-based or mechanical sensor-based) and space requirements. DISCUSSION: Several consensus groups recommend fusion systems for focal therapy. Useful features are "needle tracking" and compatibility between fusion system and treatment device (available for Artemis™, BiopSee® and Urostation® with Focal One®; BiopSee®, Hitachi HI-RVS with NanoKnife®; BioJet, BiopSee® with cryoablation, brachytherapy). CONCLUSIONS: There are a few studies for treatment planning. However, studies on treatment monitoring after focal therapy are missing.

Why we should not routinely apply irreversible electroporation as an alternative curative treatment modality for localized prostate cancer at this stage.

Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a new tissue ablation procedure available since 2007, could meet the requirements for ideal focal therapy of prostate cancer with its postulated features, especially the absence of a thermal ablation effect. Thus far, there is not enough evidence of its effectiveness or adverse effects to justify its use as a definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Moreover, neither optimal nor individual treatment parameters nor uniform endpoints have been defined thus far. No advantages over established treatment procedures have as yet been demonstrated. Nevertheless, IRE is now being increasingly applied for primary prostate cancer therapy outside clinical trials, not least through active advertising in the lay press. This review reflects the previous relevant literature on IRE of the prostate or prostate cancer and shows why we should not adopt IRE as a routine treatment modality at this stage.

Follow-up after focal therapy in renal masses: an international multidisciplinary Delphi consensus project.

PURPOSE: To establish consensus on follow-up (FU) after focal therapy (FT) in renal masses. To formulate recommendations to aid in clinical practice and research. METHODS: Key topics and questions for consensus were identified from a systematic literature research. A Web-based questionnaire was distributed among participants selected based on their contribution to the literature and/or known expertise. Three rounds according to the Delphi method were performed online. Final discussion was conducted during the "8th International Symposium on Focal Therapy and Imaging in Prostate and Kidney Cancer" among an international multidisciplinary expert panel. RESULTS: Sixty-two participants completed all three rounds of the online questionnaire. The panel recommended a minimum follow-up of 5 years, preferably extended to 10 years. The first FU was recommended at 3 months, with at least two imaging studies in the first year. Imaging was recommended biannually during the second year and annually thereafter. The panel recommended FU by means of CT scan with slice thickness ≤3 mm (at least three phases with excretory phase if suspicion of collecting system involvement) or mpMRI. Annual checkup for pulmonary metastasis by CT thorax was advised. Outside study protocols, biopsy during follow-up should only be performed in case of suspicion of residual/persistent disease or radiological recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus led to clear FU recommendations after FT of renal masses supported by a multidisciplinary expert panel. In spite of the low level of evidence, these recommendations can guide clinicians and create uniformity in the follow-up practice and for clinical research purposes.

[Focal therapy for small renal masses : Observation, ablation or surgery]. / Fokale Therapie von kleinen Nierentumoren : Beobachtung, Ablation oder Operation.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of renal cell carcinoma, its more frequent early detection (stage T1a) and the increasing prevalence of chronic renal failure with higher morbidity and shorter life expectancy underscore the need for multimodal focal nephron-sparing therapy. DISCUSSION: During the past decade, the gold standard shifted from radical to partial nephrectomy. Depending on the surgeon's experience, the patient's constitution and the tumor's location, the intervention can be performed laparoscopically with the corresponding advantages of lower invasiveness. A treatment alternative can be advantageous for selected patients with high morbidity and/or an increased risk of complications associated with anesthesia or surgery. Corresponding risk stratification necessitates previous confirmation of the small renal mass (cT1a) by histological examination of biopsy samples. Active surveillance represents a controlled delay in the initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic cryoablation are currently the most common treatment alternatives, although there are limitations particularly for renal tumors located centrally near the hilum. More recent ablation procedures such as high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), irreversible electroporation, microwave ablation, percutaneous stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and high-dose brachytherapy have high potential in some cases but are currently regarded as experimental for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

A prospective Phase 2a pilot study investigating focal percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation by NanoKnife in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with delayed interval tumour resection (IRENE trial).

INTRODUCTION: Focal ablation therapy is playing an increasing role in oncology and may reduce the toxicity of current surgical treatments while achieving adequate oncological benefit. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been proposed to be tissue-selective with potential advantages compared with current thermal-ablation technologies or radiotherapy. The aim of this pilot trial is to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of focal percutaneous IRE in patients with localised renal cell cancer as a uro-oncological tumour model. METHODS: Prospective, monocentric Phase 2a pilot study following current recommendations, including those of the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation. Twenty patients with kidney tumour (T1aN0M0) will be recruited. This sample permits an appropriate evaluation of the feasibility and effectiveness of image-guided percutaneous IRE ablation of locally confined kidney tumours as well as functional outcomes. Percutaneous biopsy for histopathology will be performed before IRE, with magnetic-resonance imaging one day before and 2, 7, 27 and 112 days after IRE; at 28 days after IRE the tumour region will be completely resected and analysed by ultra-thin-layer histology. DISCUSSION: The IRENE study will investigate over a short-term observation period (by magnetic-resonance imaging, post-resection histology and assessment of technical feasibility) whether focal IRE, as a new ablation procedure for soft tissue, is feasible as a percutaneous, tissue-sparing method for complete ablation and cure of localised kidney tumours. Results from the kidney-tumour model can provide guidance for designing an effectiveness and feasibility trial to assess this new ablative technology, particularly in uro-oncology.

[Irreversible electroporation. Current value for focal treatment of prostate cancer]. / Irreversible Elektroporation. Aktueller Stellenwert in der fokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a new tissue ablation procedure available since 2007, could meet the requirements for ideal focal therapy (FT) with its postulated features, especially the absence of a thermal ablative effect. Thus far, there is no adequate tumor-entity-specific proof of its effectiveness, and its clinical application has hitherto been confined to very small patient cohorts. This also holds true for prostate cancer (PCA). Nevertheless, it is now being increasingly applied outside clinical trials-to a certain extent due to active advertising in the lay press. AIM OF THE STUDY: In this study, current discrepancies between the clinical application and study situation and the approval and market implementation of the procedure are described. The media portrayal of IRE is discussed from different perspectives, particularly with reference to the FT of PCA. This is followed by a final clinical assessment of IRE using the NanoKnife® system. DISCUSSION: Strict requirements govern new drug approvals. According to the German Drug Act (AMG), evidence of additional benefit over existing therapy must be provided through comparative clinical trials. For medicotechnical treatment procedures, on the other hand, such trial-based proof is not required according to the Medical Devices Act (MPG). The use of IRE even outside clinical trials has been actively promoted since the NanoKnife® system was put on the market. This has led to an increase in the number of uncontrolled IRE treatments of PCA in the last 2 years. The patients have to cover the high treatment costs themselves in these cases. If articles in the lay press advertise the procedure with promising but unverified contents, false hopes are raised in those concerned. This is disastrous if it delays the use of truly effective treatment options. CONCLUSION: IRE basically still has high potential for the treatment of malignancies; however, whether it can really be used for FT remains unclear due to the lack of data. This also holds true for the treatment of PCA. Only carefully conducted scientific research studies can clarify the unresolved issues regarding IRE of PCA. The urgently needed development of universally valid treatment standards for IRE is unnecessarily hampered by the flow commercially driven patients.

[Cancer control in focus insights and future perspectives for the focal treatment of prostate cancer]. / Krebskontrolle im Fokus - Einblicke und Ausblicke rund um die fokale Therapie des Prostatakrebses.

Faced with the dilemma of choosing between the extremes of standard whole gland therapy and active surveillance, those affected by prostate cancer have recently been on the lookout for less invasive alternatives. Particularly the question of whether it would be possible in low risk cancer to treat only the tumour itself while sparing the organ has long been considered. This article discusses the pros and cons of focal treatment and elucidates the latest innovative technologies. High overtreatment rates in low-risk patients submitted to standard therapy and considerable technological advances in diagnosis (particularly multiparametric MRI) and therapy are regarded by the authors as key arguments for abandoning complete tumour eradication with its side effects in favour of sufficient local cancer control by focal treatment with better preserved quality of life in suitable cases.

[Focal therapy for prostate cancer in Germany - 2014 status]. / Fokale Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms in Deutschland - Status 2014.

BACKGROUND: In localized low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), there is a therapeutic dilemma between possible overtreatment by one of the standard therapies and potentially insufficient cancer control by active surveillance (AS). Focal therapy (FT) provides an alternative therapeutic option as it aims to preserve the organ and to eliminate the cancer focus at the same time. METHODS: In this article the current state of FT for localized low-risk prostate carcinoma in Germany is described. In addition, criteria that should be used to select patients for FT are proposed. RESULTS: Currently, the effectiveness of FT is under evaluation by two multicenter, prospective studies in Germany: TOOKAD and HEMI. However, localized low-risk prostate carcinoma remains a diagnostic challenge: Multiparametric MRI as well as histopathological second opinion are considered mandatory in addition to transrectal biospy. CONCLUSION: The oncological outcome of both the TOOKAD and HEMI study will be crucial for any form of FT for prostate carcinoma in Germany in the future. However, there is a remarkably high acceptance of FT among patients.

Reproducibility of histopathologic tumor grading in penile cancer--results of a European project.

Since reliable molecular prognostic parameters for inguinal lymph metastases in penile cancer are not available, tumor grading is often used as a surrogate prognostic tool for the indication of inguinal lymphadenctomy and has been integrated into the current TNM classification for penile cancer. The reliability of tumor grading is under discussion. We examined interobserver grading variability in 90 primary penile carcinomas, assessed by 12 different uropathologists from five European countries. Tumor grading, following the CAP scheme, was compared, and interobserver variability was calculated using kappa statistics. The interobserver variability was high as reflected by an overall low kappa coefficient (mean k = 0.34) and reached a moderate level only in 26.4 % of the cases (range 0.02-0.67). The percentage of G1 tumors assigned ranged from 8.6 to 52.5 %, G2 tumors from 27.1 to 72.6 % and G3 tumors from 11.7 to 48.7 %. Only some observers assigned G4 with a range of 0.6-21.9 %. Subdivision into low and high grade according to UICC and EAU classifications differed significantly (P < 0.001). Low reproducibility of grading in penile carcinomas with the favored method does not allow a reliable prognostication of tumor aggressiveness. Inclusion of histological grading into the TNM classification currently seems not to be a benefit.

[Focal prostate cancer therapy: capabilities, limitations and prospects]. / Fokale Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms: Möglichkeiten, Limitierungen und Ausblick.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) face the difficult decision between a potential overtreatment by one of the standard therapies and active surveillance (AS) with the potential insecurity regarding cancer control. A focal therapy (FT) implies a treatment of the tumor within the prostate only. METHODS: This review evaluates the current literature and expert opinion of different therapies suited for FT as well as concepts for prostate imaging, biopsy and histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: Currently there is a lack of multicenter, randomized, prospective data on the effectiveness of FT. Nonetheless, the published data indicate a sufficient tumor control with a favorable side effect profile. There are still flaws in the diagnostics with regard to tumor detection and histological evaluation. Multicenter studies are currently recruiting worldwide which will provide new data with a higher level of evidence. CONCLUSION: At present, the effectiveness of FT should not be compared directly to standard radical therapies and FT should only be performed within studies. In cases of cancer progression after FT a salvage treatment should still be possible.

Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.

High upgrading rates of Gleason score 6 to 7 carcinomas between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens may be produced by change of fused glands of pattern 3 to pattern 4. Therefore, inter-observer reproducibility of fused and non-fused glands in biopsy specimens was analysed. Images of H&E stained slides of glands of carcinomas with Gleason score 6 and 7 (3 + 4) with and without glandular fusions with different lens magnification were analysed by 4 specialized genitourinary pathologists and 3 non-specialized pathologists. The definition of glandular fusion was a complete lack of any stromal fibres between a minimum of two glands and only one line of nuclei within the area of fusion. Overall agreement and inter-observer reproducibility of fused versus non-fused glands of non- and uro-pathologically specialized pathologists were lower in lens magnification of 50× in contrast to 200×. The inter-observer reproducibility of fused glands by specialized observer was higher than that of non-specialized pathologists. The results support the importance of strict but practicable criteria for the diagnosis of fused tumor glands in order to decrease the interobserver variability of Gleason scores, particularly in non-specialised pathologists.

Activating BRAF gene mutations are uncommon in hormone refractory prostate cancer in Caucasian patients.

Activating mutations in the cytosolic serine/threonine kinase, BRAF, have been reported in a variety of neoplasms. BRAF activation may contribute to tumor growth via activation of the MAP/ERK kinase pathway, and BRAF represents a possible therapeutic target. Activating BRAF mutations were recently reported in approximately 10% of prostate cancer cases in Asian patients. In the present study, 43 hormone refractory prostate cancers were analyzed for BRAF mutations in order to determine whether anti-BRAF therapy is a suitable approach for advanced prostate cancer patients. In all of the studied tumors, BRAF exons 11 and 15 were PCR-amplified and sequenced, including the backward and forward sequences. BRAF mutations were noted only in the positive control tissues, but were not found in any of the 43 analyzed prostate cancers. We conclude that BRAF mutations occur only rarely in prostate cancers in Caucasian patients and are not associated with tumor progression. The application of anti-BRAF therapies may therefore not be beneficial for prostate cancer.