Lack of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between lithium and valproate when co-administered with aripiprazole.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The antipsychotic, aripiprazole, plus lithium or valproate demonstrates rapid and significant improvement in manic symptoms that is sustained over the long term. A previous report showed that therapeutic doses of either lithium or valproate had no clinically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole. We aimed to determine the effects of co-administration of aripiprazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lithium or valproate in healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two similarly designed, open-label, single-sequence studies were conducted. Healthy subjects received daily oral doses of either lithium (450 mg every 12 h) or valproate (500 mg every 12 h) on Days 1-7. Following Day 7 was a 2-day washout period, and on Day 10, subjects began receiving oral doses of aripiprazole (10 mg once daily) for 2 days. Aripiprazole was then titrated from 10 to 20 mg once daily to establish tolerance of aripiprazole. On Day 14, the dose was escalated and subjects received aripiprazole 30 mg once daily for 13 days. Beginning on Day 20, subjects received lithium (450 mg every 12 h) or valproate (500 mg every 12 h) concomitantly with aripiprazole 30 mg once daily through Day 26. Serial blood samples for serum lithium or valproate concentration determination were collected for up to 12 h post-lithium or valproate administration on Days 7 and 26. RESULTS: The lithium study enrolled 32 healthy subjects (72% completed the study), and the valproate study enrolled 48 healthy subjects (58% completed the study). In both studies, the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of population geometric means, with and without aripiprazole, were contained within 80% and 125% for both the C(max) and AUC(τ) , respectively. Furthermore, the addition of aripiprazole did not change the median T(max) of lithium or valproate (4 h). Thus, the addition of aripiprazole did not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lithium or valproate. The majority of subjects (76·9% for aripiprazole plus lithium and 68·4% for aripiprazole plus valproate) reported adverse events, but this adverse event profile is consistent with what has been observed in other studies. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The addition of aripiprazole to either lithium or valproate had no clinically meaningful effects on the pharmacokinetics of either drug. In addition, co-administration of aripiprazole with lithium or valproate demonstrated no unexpected safety signals in healthy subjects.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in heart failure.

Alterations in the pharmacokinetic parameters of a number of medications have been observed in patients with heart failure. Because the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan has beneficial effects in patients with heart failure, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in 10 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure compared with 10 control subjects matched with respect to race, age, weight, and sex were studied. In a crossover study, participants were randomized to receive open-label irbesartan 75 mg as either an oral capsule or an intravenous (i.v.) infusion in the first treatment period. After a 7- to 10-day washout period, participants were crossed over to the other treatment arm. Single-dose noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, angiotensin II levels, and plasma renin activity (PRA) of irbesartan were determined for each participant. Following oral and i.v. administration, the pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in patients with heart failure was not significantly different from those of matched controls, indicating that there is little influence of potential changes in organ/tissue perfusion and gut edema on the absorption, distribution, and elimination of irbesartan. After dosing with irbesartan, mean increases in angiotensin II and PRA concentrations were higher in patients with heart failure than in the matched controls, but there was more interpatient variability in the patients with heart failure. Given the variability of the data, no definitive conclusions can be made with regard to these pharmacodynamic parameters. The results of this study indicate that the pharmacokinetics of irbesartan following oral and i.v. administration is not altered in patients with heart failure. Therefore, this indicates that no dosage adjustment is needed when prescribing irbesartan in heart failure patients.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of omapatrilat in heart failure.

The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of omapatrilat, administered orally (25 mg) or intravenously (10 mg) in 19 New York Heart Association class II and class III congestive heart failure (CHF) patients versus 17 healthy controls matched for age, race, gender, and weight. The plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) increased by approximately 20% and 30% in CHF and control subjects, respectively, at 4 hours after intravenous or oral omapatrilat administration. Similar elevation in the cyclic guanosine monophosphate concentration (25% to 35%) and ANP urinary excretion (21 ng/24 h to 22 ng/24 h) was seen in all treatment groups after omapatrilat administration. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was > 90% inhibited at 4 hours after dosing and remained approximately 60% to 70% inhibited at 24 hours after dosing. The levels of endothelin-1 and endothelin-2 remained unchanged after oral or intravenous administration of omapatrilat. The maximal reduction in seated blood pressure compared with baseline was similarfor CHF and control subjects. Clinical pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in both groups after intravenous dosing, but maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve were elevated in CHF patients compared with controls after oral dosing. Omapatrilat was well tolerated; differences in systemic exposure and metabolism between CHF patients and controls did not appear to be clinically significant.

A dose-escalation study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous gatifloxacin in healthy adult men.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine single- and multiple-dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin administered as daily 1-hour intravenous infusions for 14 days, and to determine the effect of gatifloxacin on glucose tolerance, pancreatic beta-cell function, and electrocardiogram (ECG). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study. SETTING: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. PATIENTS: Forty healthy male subjects, eight in each of five groups, were enrolled to receive sequential doses of gatifloxacin: 200 mg (10 mg/ml), 200 mg (1 mg/ml), and 400, 600, and 800 mg (2 mg/ml); six subjects per group received active drug and two received placebo. INTERVENTIONS: A single dose of the drug was administered as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour. After a 72-hour washout period, the drug was administered once/day for 14 days by 1-hour intravenous infusion. Physical examinations, ECGs, spirometry, and clinical laboratory tests, including glucose tolerance test (GTT) and assessment of glucose homeostasis, were performed before treatment and on selected dosing days. A safety evaluation was performed before escalating doses. No intrasubject dose escalation was permitted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin were dose linear and time independent after intravenous administration over the range of 200-800 mg. After daily repeated administration, a predictable, modest accumulation was observed; steady state was reached by the third dose. Approximately 80% of the dose was recovered as unchanged drug in urine. Mean changes (before the first dose to the last dose) after oral GTT and in fasting serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were comparable among the gatifloxacin and placebo treatment groups. A mild, transient decrease in serum glucose was associated with the end of the 1-hour infusion of gatifloxacin. No clinically important changes in QTc interval or spirometry occurred. The most frequent treatment-related adverse effects were local intravenous site reactions, which were associated with dose and/or concentration of intravenous solution. CONCLUSION: Gatifloxacin was safe and well tolerated at intravenous doses of up to 800 mg/day for 14 days. Gatifloxacin pharmacokinetics were linear and time independent.

Interchangeability of 400-mg intravenous and oral gatifloxacin in healthy adults.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interchangeability of 400-mg intravenous and oral doses of gatifloxacin. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, crossover study. SETTING: GFI Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Evansville, Indiana, USA. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four healthy men and women (12 of each gender), aged 18-42 years. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received single doses of gatifloxacin 400 mg either by intravenous infusion over 1 hour or a 400-mg tablet orally with 240 ml of water, each dose separated by a 1-week washout. Plasma concentrations of gatifloxacin were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography; pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Distributions of pharmacokinetic parameter values were summarized by route of administration and gender. Effects of treatment on pharmacokinetic parameter values of gatifloxacin were assessed by an analysis of variance model suitable for a two-way, two-treatment, crossover design. Clinical evaluations were performed to assess drug safety and tolerability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intravenous and oral gatifloxacin were considered interchangeable because both routes were bioequivalent with respect to area under the curve (AUC; 90% confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means contained within 0.8-1.25). The plasma concentration-time profile after intravenous administration was similar and comparable in extent of exposure (AUC0-infinity) with that for the oral route when equal doses were administered to men and women. The absolute bioavailability of gatifloxacin after oral administration was 96%, consistent with bioequivalence of the 400-mg intravenous and oral doses. The drug was well tolerated; the frequency of adverse events was comparable after intravenous and oral administration. CONCLUSION: Intravenous and tablet formulations of gatifloxacin are bioequivalent and therefore interchangeable. This permits greater flexibility in choosing oral or parenteral therapy, with the possibility of avoiding hospitalization based on knowledge that oral administration will deliver therapeutic exposure to the drug, or abbreviating hospital stay due to ease of switching from intravenous to oral therapy.

Age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of gatifloxacin in elderly (> or = 65 yrs) and young (18-45 yrs) men and women. DESIGN: Open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study. SETTING: GFI Pharmaceutical Services Inc., Evansville, Indiana, USA. SUBJECTS: Forty-eight healthy subjects in four groups of 12 each. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received single oral doses of gatifloxacin 400 mg. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 96 hours after dosing to determine drug concentrations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age and gender had moderate effects on the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin. Elderly women had a 21% higher geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and a 32% higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) than young women. Adjustment for creatinine clearance had only a slight effect on Cmax but reduced the estimated effect of age on AUC0-infinity in women from a 32% increase to a 15% increase. Gender effects on pharmacokinetic values were noted among elderly subjects only. Geometric means for Cmax and AUC0-infinity were 21% and 33% higher, respectively, for elderly women and elderly men. Adjustment for body weight reduced these differences to 11% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The effects of age on gatifloxacin pharmacokinetic values were largely attributed to declining renal function, whereas those of gender were largely attributed to differences in body weight. These modest age- and gender-related differences do not warrant dosage adjustment.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of gatifloxacin in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral gatifloxacin 400 mg in subjects with and without hepatic impairment, and the need to modify doses in patients with hepatic dysfunction. DESIGN: Single-dose, nonrandomized, open-label, parallel-group study. SETTING: Clinical Research Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. PATIENTS: Eight subjects with grade B or C hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh classification) and eight age-, weight-, and gender-matched subjects with normal hepatic function. INTERVENTIONS: After a single oral dose of gatifloxacin 400 mg, blood and urine samples were collected at specified times or intervals over 48 hours to determine drug concentrations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All 16 subjects (7 with grade B and 1 with grade C hepatic impairment, 8 with normal hepatic function) completed the study. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) for gatifloxacin were 32% and 22% higher, respectively, in subjects with hepatic impairment. Except for Cmax, the ratio of means for AUC satisfied the specified criterion (0.67-1.50) for lack of effect. There were no statistically significant differences in any other pharmacokinetic values except apparent oral clearance (ClT/F). All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity and resolved before subjects were discharged from the study. CONCLUSION: Modest increases in Cmax and AUC0-infinity are not anticipated to have a negative effect on the outcome of therapy in hepatically impaired subjects, nor are they anticipated to result in adverse drug reactions. Patients with moderate to severe (Child-Pugh grade B or C) hepatic dysfunction do not require gatifloxacin dose adjustments. In addition, the similarity in half-life (t1/2) for the groups (8.9 hrs for hepatically impaired subjects, 9.3 hrs for controls) suggests that no difference would be anticipated in the extent of drug accumulation after multiple doses. The overall safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of gatifloxacin 400 mg were excellent in both healthy subjects and those with hepatic impairment.

Effect of multiple-dose gatifloxacin or ciprofloxacin on glucose homeostasis and insulin production in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus maintained with diet and exercise.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin on glucose homeostasis, including glucose tolerance test (GTT), pancreatic beta-cell function, and insulin production and secretion in patients with noninsulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) maintained with diet and exercise; and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of gatifloxacin. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study. SETTING: GFI Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Evansville, Indiana; Chicago Center for Clinical Research, Chicago, Illinois; and New Orleans Center for Clinical Research, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. PATIENTS: Forty-eight men and women with NIDDM. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned sequentially at enrollment to receive gatifloxacin 400 mg/day orally, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice/day orally, or placebo for 10 days. Oral GTTs were performed on specific days throughout the study, as well as measurements of serum glucose, serum insulin, and C-peptide levels. Physical examinations, electrocardiograms, spirometry, and clinical laboratory tests were performed before dosing and on selected dosing days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gatifloxacin had no significant effect on glucose tolerance and pancreatic beta-cell function, as shown by oral GTT results and insulin and C-peptide levels. Fasting glucose levels 0-6 hours after gatifloxacin administration on days 1 and 10 showed a downward trend, but it was not significant compared with placebo; results were similar with ciprofloxacin. Gatifloxacin also lacked a long-term effect on fasting insulin levels, but this was not shown for a short-term effect, suggesting a modest, transient effect on insulin release. On the other hand, ciprofloxacin had no short-term effect but produced a more sustained effect on insulin release and production. The pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in patients with NIDDM were similar to those in healthy subjects. Overall, subjects tolerated treatment well. All reported drug-related adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity. The frequency of adverse events was similar in gatifloxacin- and ciprofloxacin-treated patients, and only slightly higher than in placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Gatifloxacin was well tolerated in patients with NIDDM controlled by diet and exercise. It had no significant effect on glucose homeostasis, beta-cell function, or long-term fasting serum glucose levels, but it did cause a brief increase in serum insulin levels.

Open-label, nonrandomized study of the effects of gatifloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in healthy male volunteers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To confirm findings from an in vitro study that showed gatifloxacin did not substantially inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 model substrate metabolism. DESIGN: Open-label, nonrandomized trial. SETTING: Clinical pharmacology unit. SUBJECTS: Fourteen healthy adult men. INTERVENTION: Using midazolam probe methodology, the clearance of midazolam in the presence of multiple-dose gatifloxacin was evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Typical steady-state concentrations of gatifloxacin 400 mg once/day had no effect on midazolam clearance, and gatifloxacin pharmacokinetics were unaffected by midazolam. All doses of both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Data from this in vivo trial support in vitro experience with gatifloxacin and suggest that interactions are unlikely between gatifloxacin and drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A.

Evaluation of the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan.

Bioavailability of avitriptan was found to decrease significantly when administered 5 min after a standard high fat meal. The studies described herein were carried out to gain insight into the mechanism of this food effect. A series of studies were conducted in humans to assess the effect of timing of meal, type of meal, gastric pH, change in the formulation and dose on the bioavailability of avitriptan. Avitriptan was administered as a 50 mg capsule under fasted condition and at 30 min, 1, 2 and 4 h after a standard high fat meal. The reduction in avitriptan bioavailability persisted even at 4 h post high fat meal, although as the time interval between the meal and dose increased, the effect of meal tended to decrease. Bioavailability of avitriptan also decreased significantly when the drug was administered after a high protein and a high carbohydrate meal. Elevation in gastric pH caused by food was not found to be responsible for the food-related decrease in bioavailability of avitriptan since ranitidine pretreatment did not lead to a decrease in bioavailability. When administered as a 50 mg 14C-labeled solution after a standard high fat meal, bioavailability of avitriptan decreased although the decrease was less compared with that observed for a capsule dosage form. Plasma concentrations and cumulative urinary excretion of total radioactivity also decreased in the fed condition, indicating the absorption of avitriptan was affected. The decrease in avitriptan AUC was somewhat more pronounced than the decrease in the exposure to the total radioactivity suggesting a food-related increase in the first-pass metabolism of avitriptan. Effect of the standard high fat meal on avitriptan administered as a 150 mg capsule was similar to that observed at the 50 mg dose. Overall, the results indicate that bioavailability of avitriptan is significantly reduced irrespective of the type of meal, dose and dosage form and the effect persists for as long as 4 h post meal. Thus, it appears that avitriptan absorption and bioavailability are highly sensitive to presence of food in the stomach and any food-related changes in gastric emptying time and gastrointestinal motility.

A pharmacokinetic interaction study of avitriptan and propranolol.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a clinically significant change in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and propranolol is observed in healthy subjects after coadministration of the two drugs. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and propranolol were investigated when the two drugs administered separately and when two 150 mg doses of avitriptan 2 hours apart were added to a steady-state regimen (80 mg twice a day) of propranolol. The pharmacokinetics of metabolites of avitriptan (N-desmethylavitriptan, methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine, and O-desmethylavitriptan) and the pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxypropranolol were also assessed. RESULTS: Administration of avitriptan alone and together with propranolol resulted in small increases in mean blood pressure and small decreases in heart rate. Administration of propranolol resulted in lowering of blood pressure and heart rate consistent with the beta-blocking actions of propranolol. There were no changes in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan after coadministration with propranolol. However, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of propranolol showed a 20% increase after coadministration with avitriptan, whereas the AUC of 4-hydroxypropranolol significantly decreased. Avitriptan therefore appeared to affect the metabolism of propranolol to 4-hydroxypropranolol. The peak plasma concentration and AUC for N-desmethylavitriptan and the AUC for methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine also showed statistically significant increases (about 25%) when avitriptan was coadministered with propranolol. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the wide safety margin of propranolol, the increase in the exposure is not clinically significant. The increase in the exposure to the metabolites of avitriptan is also not considered to be clinically significant because the metabolite contribution to the pharmacologic activity or side effects is expected to be minimal. Based on these findings, avitriptan may be added to a steady-state regimen of propranolol as an abortive antimigraine therapy.

The effects of age and gender on the single dose pharmacokinetics of avitriptan administered to healthy volunteers.

The effects of age and gender on the single dose pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and its three metabolites were assessed in 15 young men, 15 young women, 15 elderly men and 15 elderly women. Avitriptan was administered as a 150-mg capsule after a 10-hour fast and serial plasma and urine samples were collected up to 36 hours after the dose. Plasma samples were analyzed for avitriptan and its metabolites, N-desmethyl avitriptan (ND048), O-desmethyl avitriptan (OD048), and methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine (MPP). Urine samples were analyzed for only avitriptan and MPP. Avitriptan was well tolerated in all four groups. The drug was rapidly absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) between 0.5 and 1.5 hours. No significant gender-related differences were found in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of avitriptan. Renal clearance of avitriptan was significantly smaller in young women compared with young men, but this is clinically not relevant because only 2% to 3% of the total dose is excreted unchanged. Compared with the young volunteers, mean Cmax was approximately 50% higher in the elderly but there was no difference in the AUC0-infinity between the 2 age groups. Plasma concentrations of ND048, OD048, and MPP were each 50 to 100 fold lower than those of avitriptan. Hence some age- and gender-related differences found in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan metabolites are probably not relevant in the assessment of overall safety and efficacy of avitriptan. Based on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability, no age or gender-related dose adjustment is necessary for avitriptan.

Benefits and disadvantages of joint hypermobility among musicians.

BACKGROUND: Joint hypermobility is considered to be both an advantage and a disadvantage. However, the degree of hypermobility in members of particular occupations requiring intense physical activity and the nature of the association between symptoms referable to specific joints and their hypermobility are unknown. METHODS: We interviewed 660 musicians (300 women and 360 men) about work-related symptoms such as joint pain and swelling and examined them for joint hypermobility according to a standard protocol. We then determined the relation between the mobility of their fingers, thumbs, elbows, knees, and spine and any symptoms referable to these regions. RESULTS: Five of the 96 musicians (5 percent) with hypermobility of the wrists, mostly instrumentalists who played the flute, violin, or piano, had pain and stiffness in this region, whereas 100 of the 564 musicians (18 percent) without such hypermobility had symptoms (P = 0.001). Hypermobility of the elbow was associated with symptoms in only 1 of 208 musicians (< 1 percent), whereas 7 of 452 (2 percent) without this hypermobility had symptoms (P = 0.45). Among the 132 musicians who had hypermobile knees, 6 (5 percent) had symptoms, whereas only 1 of 528 (< 1 percent) with normal knees had symptoms (P < 0.001). Of the 462 musicians who had normal mobility of the spine, 50 (11 percent) had symptoms involving the back, as compared with 46 of the 198 musicians (23 percent) who had hypermobility of the spine (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among musicians who play instruments requiring repetitive motion, hypermobility of joints such as the wrists and elbows may be an asset, whereas hypermobility of less frequently moved joints such as the knees and spine may be a liability.